31.07.2014 Views

Numéro 60--- ÉTÉ 2007 - Vho

Numéro 60--- ÉTÉ 2007 - Vho

Numéro 60--- ÉTÉ 2007 - Vho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GAZETTE DU GOLFE ET DES BANLIEUES / <strong>60</strong> / ÉTÉ <strong>2007</strong><br />

out and drop powerful bombs over a populated area, and then learn that there have been a<br />

number of "unintended" casualties, and then the next day drop more bombs and learn again that<br />

there were "unintended" casualties, and then the next day you bomb again ... at what point do<br />

you lose the right to say that the deaths were "unintended"?<br />

During the US/NATO 78-day bombing of Serbia in 1999, which killed many civilians, a<br />

Belgrade office building -- which housed political parties, TV and radio stations, 100 private<br />

companies, and more -- was bombed. But before the missiles were fired into this building, NATO<br />

planners spelled out the risks: "Casualty Estimate 50-100 Government/Party employees.<br />

Unintended Civ Casualty Est: 250 -- Apts in expected blast radius."[11] The planners were<br />

saying that about 250 civilians living in nearby apartment buildings might be killed in the<br />

bombing, in addition to 50 to 100 government and political party employees, likewise innocent<br />

of any crime calling for execution. So what do we have here? We have grown men telling each<br />

other: We'll do A, and we think that B may well be the result. But even if B does in fact result,<br />

we're saying beforehand -- as we'll insist afterward -- that it was unintended.<br />

It was actually worse than this. As I've detailed elsewhere, the main purpose of the Serbian<br />

bombings -- admitted to by NATO officials -- was to make life so difficult for the public that<br />

support of the government of Slobodan Milosevic would be undermined.[12] This, in fact, is the<br />

classic definition of "terrorism", as used by the FBI and the United Nations: The use or threat of<br />

violence against a civilian population to induce the government to change certain policies.<br />

Another example of how "the enemy" can't be trusted to act as nice as god-fearing regular<br />

Americans ... "Defense officials said they believe at least 22 -- and possibly as many as 50 --<br />

former Guantánamo detainees have returned to the battlefield to fight against the United States<br />

and its allies."[13] The Defense Department has at times used the possibility of this happening as<br />

an argument against releasing detainees or closing Guantánamo.<br />

But is it imaginable, not to mention likely, that after three, four or five years in the hell on<br />

earth known as Guantánamo, even detainees not disposed to terrorist violence -- and many of<br />

them were picked up for reasons having nothing to do with terrorist violence -- left with a deepseated<br />

hatred of their jailors and a desire for revenge?<br />

Extract from The Anti-Empire Report Read this or George W. Bush will be president the rest of your life ,<br />

July 9, <strong>2007</strong><br />

http://members.aol.com/bblum6/aer47.htm<br />

L'INTROMISSION DE LA DÉMOCRATIE PAR LES VOIES BASSES<br />

Sodomy Returns to Afghanistan<br />

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey<br />

The Taleban gone, the tradition of sodomy returns to Kandahar. Bearded men, accompanied<br />

by their “ashna” (beloved boys) are again openly visible on the streets.<br />

The Taleban had forbidden the Pashtun tradition of “ashna”, the grooming of favourite boys<br />

for sexual pleasure. In one of his first acts in 1994, Mullah Omar freed a boy who was being fought<br />

over by two Mujaheddin warlords in Kandahar, who had started firing artillery rounds at each other’s<br />

positions, destroying part of the city. Called to mediate in other such affairs, the Taleban movement<br />

quickly implanted itself in Kandahari society.<br />

The Taleban quickly applied their medieval rules to those caught practising sodomy: they were<br />

forced to stand under a stone wall, which was felled on top of them. Eye witnesses in Kandahar speak<br />

of the change under the Taleban, and the subsequent return of the ashna.<br />

One witness is the soldier Torjan. “In the later Mujaheddin years”, he told the British<br />

newspaper The Times, “more and more soldiers would take boys by force and keep them for as long<br />

as they wished. When the Taleban came, they were very strict about the ban”. However, the streets of<br />

Kandahar are now full of bearded men (usually married with families), walking openly accompanied<br />

by 15- or 16-year-old boys.<br />

— 72 —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!