C a r t e s i u s - BME Filozófia és Tudománytörténet Tanszék

Bijker, Wiebe E. 1993. Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism. Science, Technology, andHuman Values 18 (1, Theme Issue: Technological Choices):113-138.Billig, Michael. 1989. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Binzberger, Viktor, Márta Fehér ésGábor Zemplén, szerk. 2007. Kuhn és a relativizmus. szerk. G.Zemplén. Vol. IV/I, Tudománytörténet és Tudományfilozófia. Budapest: L'Harmattan.Birch, Thomas. 1756. The history of the Royal Society of London, for improving of natural knowledge, from itsfirst rise: in which the most considerable of those papers communicated to the society, which have hithertonot been published, are inserted in their proper order, as a supplement to the Philosophical transactions.London: Printed for A. Millar.Birch, Thomas ésRoyal Society. 1968. The history of the Royal Society of London, for improving of naturalknowledge, from its first rise, Sources of science; 44. New York: Johnson Reprint Corp.Biringuccio, Vanoccio. 1942. Pirotechnica. Translated by C. S. Smith ésM. Teach. New York:Gnudi.———. 1942/1959. Pirotechnica. Translated by C. S. Smith ésM. T. Gnudi. New York.Bitzer, L. ésE. Black, szerk. 1971. The prospect of rhetoric: Report of the National Development Project.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: CornellUniversity Press.Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.———. 1983. Wittgenstein: a social theory of knowledge, Contemporary social theory. London: MacmillanPress.———. 1991. Knowledge and social imagery. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Bloor, David. 1982. Durkheim and Mauss revisited. Classification and the sociology ofknowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13 (4):267-298.———. 1997. Remember the Strong Program? Science, Technology, and Human Values 22 (3):373-385.———. 1997. Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. London: Routledge.———. 1999. Anti-Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30 (1):81-112.———. 1999. Reply to Bruno Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30 (1):131–136.———. 2005. Durkheim és Mauss újraolvasása. In Tudásszociológia szöveggyűjtemény, szerk. M.Fehér ésV. Békés. Budapest: Typotex.———. 2007. Epistemic Grace: Antirelativism as Theology in Disguise. Common Knowledge 13 (2-3):250-280.———. 2008. Relativism at 30 000 feet. In Knowledge as Social Order: Rethinking the Sociology of BarryBarnes, szerk. M. Mazzotti: AshgateBonevac, Daniel. 2003. Pragma-dialectics and beyond. Argumentation 17:451-459.Bons, J. A. E. 2002. Reasonable Argument Before Aristotle. In Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp andWoof of Argumentation Analysis, szerk. F. H. v. Eemeren ésP. Houtlosser. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.Boros, János ésGuttman András. 2004. Gének, társadalom és az értelmezés tudománya. MagyarTudomány 49 (9):1029-1032.———. 2004. Genetizmus: gének és társadalom. Magyar Tudomány 49 (6):752-756.Bourdieu, Pierre.———. 2005. A tudomány tudománya és a reflexivitás. Translated by N. Házas ésV. Simon. Budapest:Gondolat.Bowie, Andrew. 2000. The Romantic connection: Neurath, the Frankfurt School, and Heidegger.British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2,3):275-298, 459-483.Bowker, Geof ésBruno Latour. 1987. A Booming Discipline Short of Discipline: (Social) Studiesof Science in France. Social Studies of Science 17 (4):715-748.