Collins, H. M. 1983. The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: Studies of Contemporary Science.Annual Review of Sociology 9:265-285.———. 1985. Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.———. 1987. Pumps, Rocks and Reality. The Sociological Review 17:689-713.———. 1996. In Praise of Futile Gestures: How Scientific is the Sociology of ScientificKnowledge? Social Studies of Science 26 (2):229-244.———. 1999. Szakaszok a relativizmus empirikus programjában. In Tudományfilozófiaszöveggyűjtemény, szerk. P. Szegedi ésG. Forrai. Budapest: Áron.———. 2001. A Martian sends a postcard home. In The one culture? A conversation about science,szerk. J. A. Labinger ésH. Collins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Collins, H. M. ésRobert Evans. 2002. The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertiseand Experience. Social Studies of Science 32 (2):235-296.———. 2007. Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Collins, H. M. ésTrevor Pinch. 1982. Frames of meaning: the social construction of extraordinary science.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.———. 1993. The golem: what everyone should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.———. 1998. The golem at large: what you should know about technology. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.———. 1998. The golem: what you should know about science. 2nd ed. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.———. 2005. Dr. Golem: how to think about medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.———. 2007. Dr. Gólem: útmutató az orvostudományhoz. Budapest: Scolar.Collins, Harry ésSteven Yearly. 1992. Epistemological Chicken. In Science as Practice and Culture,szerk. A. Pickering. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Condorcet, Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat, marquis de. 1986. Az emberi szellem fejlődésének vázlatostörténete. Budapest: Gondolat.Copi, I. M. 1953. Introduction to logic. New York: Macmillan.Corsi, Pietro. 2005. Before Darwin: Transformist Concepts in European Natural History. Journalof the History of Biology 38 (1):67-83.Cosmides, Leda ésJohn Tooby. 2000. Evolúciós Pszichológia: alapozó kurzus. Replika (40):101-124.Crane, Tim ésD. H. Mellor. 1990. There is No Question of Physicalism. Mind, New Series 99(394):185-206.Cranston, Maurice. 1991. The Noble Savage: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1754-1762. Chicago: University ofChicago Press.Crary, Jonathan. 1999. A megfigyelő módszerei. Látás és modernitás a 19. Században. Translated by Á.Lukács. szerk. C. Pléh. Budapest: Osiris.Craver, Carl F. 2007. Explaining the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Creath, R. 1993. Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle - Austrian Studies on Neurath,Ottoand the Vienna Circle - Uebel,Te. Isis 84 (2):423-424.———. 1993. Reflexive Epistemology - the Philosophical Legacy of Neurath,Otto - Zolo,D.Philosophy of Science 60 (2):359-360.Crombie, Alistair C. 1995. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition: the history of argument andexplanation especially in the mathematical and biomedical sciences and arts. London: Duckworth.Cunningham, Andrew ésNicholas Jardine, szerk. 1990. Romanticism and the sciences. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Curd, Martin ésJ. A. Cover. 1998. Philosophy of science: the central issues. New York: W.W. Norton.Cushman, D. P. ésL. J. Prelli. 1981. Rhetoric and Epistemology from an Action TheoryPerspective. Central States Speech Journal 32 (4):273-278.
Custer, Joseph A., Barbara J. Ginzburg, Robert A. Mead ésKansas Bar Association. 2003. Kansaslegal research and reference guide. 3rd ed. Topeka, Kan.: Kansas Bar Association.Csibra, Gergely ésGyörgy Gergely. 2009. Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13:148-153.Dahms, H. J. 1987. Collected Philosophical and Methodological Writings, Vols 1-2 - German -Neurath,O. Archiv Fur Geschichte Der Philosophie 69 (2):229-235.Dani*el*, I. Uli i, Aleksandr Ginzburg ésLeonid Borodin. 1971. Istori*i*a odno*i golodovki, ma*ii*i*un*1969 goda. [Frankfurt/Main]: Posev.Darling, Karen Merikangas. 2002. The complete Duhemian underdetermination argument:scientific language and practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33:511-533.———. 2002. The complete Duhemian underdetermination argument: scientific language andpractice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33A:511-533.Darwin, Charles, Paul H. Barrett ésHoward E. Gruber. 1980. Metaphysics, Materialism, & theevolution of mind : the early writings of Charles Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Dascal, Marcelo. 1983. Pragmatics and the philosophy of mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.———. 1987. Leibniz : language, signs and thought : a collection of essays, Foundations of semiotics ; 10.Amsterdam: Benjamins.———. 1992. Sprachphilosophie : ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Handbücher zurSprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft ; 7. Berlin: De Gruyter.———. 1998. Types of polemics and types of polemical moves. In Dialogue Analysis VI(Proceedings of the 6th Conference, Prague, 1996), szerk. S. Cmejrkova, J. Hoffmannova, O.Mullerova ésJ. Svetla. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.———. 2000. Epistemology and controversies. In Philosophy of Science [= Volume 10 of Proceedings ofthe Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy], szerk. T. Y. Cao. Philadelphia: PhilosophersIndex Inc.———. 2001. How rational can a polemic across the analytic-continental 'divide' be? InternationalJournal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):313-339.———. 2003. Interpretation and understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.———. 2008. Dichotomies and types of debate. In Controversy and Confrontation - Relating controversyanalysis with argumentation theory, szerk. F. v. Eemeren ésB. Garssen. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins.———. 2008. Dichotomies and types of debates. In Controversy and Confrontation, szerk. F. H. v.Eemeren ésB. Garssen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Dascal, Marcelo ésHubert Cuyckens. 1985. Dialogue: an interdisciplinary approach, Pragmatics & beyondcompanion series ; 1. Amsterdam: Benjamin.Dascal, Marcelo, Hubert Cuyckens, Donald Davidson, Francis Jacques, George Lakoff, E. M.Barth, Luis E. Behares, Lindsey J. Cordery, Beatriz Gabbiani, Carina Lago ésInternationalEncounter on the Philosophy of Language. 1985. Dialogue: an interdisciplinary approach ;[papers presented at the 1st International Encounter on the Philosophy of Language held in Campinas,Brazil in Aug. 1981], Pragmatics and beyond / Companion series, 1. Amsterdam {[u.a.]:Benjamins.Dascal, Marcelo ésGerd Fritz. 2002. Scientific controversies and the theories of controversy. Giessen,.Dascal, Marcelo ésAlan G. Gross. 1999. The Marriage of Pragmatics and Rhetoric. Philosophy andRhetoric 32 (2):107-130.Daston, Lorraine. 2000. Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.———. 2004. Things that talk: object lessons from art and science. New York: Zone Books.Daston, Lorraine ésKatharine Park. 1998. Wonders and the order of nature, 1150-1750. New York:Zone Books.Davidson, Donald. 1984. Radical Interpretation. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, szerk. D.Davidson. Oxford: Clarendon.———. 2004. Expressing Evaluations. In Problems of Rationality, szerk. D. Davidson. Oxford:Clarendon.
- Page 2: Fehér Márta és Péter Ágnes tis
- Page 5 and 6: Édesanyám akadémiai Magyar Ezüs
- Page 7 and 8: A Külső Gyűjtemény tiszteletér
- Page 9 and 10: Az energiakiegyenlítés díjtalan,
- Page 11 and 12: Zemplén Gábor ÁronCartesius és
- Page 13 and 14: másrészt az emberek esetében egy
- Page 15 and 16: a fizika következménye marad, a f
- Page 17 and 18: lásd az értelmezéshez a 2.d. mel
- Page 19 and 20: világban azonosítható és társa
- Page 21 and 22: anyag nyilvánvaló prioritással r
- Page 23 and 24: Huxley meg életútja során továb
- Page 25 and 26: A Vörös Sárkány egyesítéséhe
- Page 27 and 28: C feladat: tanulj meg repülni, mag
- Page 29 and 30: …és az tényleg a Chomsky? rám
- Page 31 and 32: 1)a kikötés, miszerint az anyag n
- Page 33 and 34: olyan közösségek között, akik
- Page 35 and 36: Egy új energetikai képlet meghat
- Page 37 and 38: tagoltsági szinten érvényesülő
- Page 39 and 40: II.: 142). Nagyon hasonlót állít
- Page 41 and 42: Fehér, Láng ésZemplén 2004, 200
- Page 43 and 44: Arbib, Michael A. ésMary B. Hesse.
- Page 45 and 46: Bijker, Wiebe E. 1993. Do Not Despa
- Page 47: Carnap, Rudolf. 1922. Der Raum. Ein
- Page 51 and 52: ———. 2009. Understanding (in)
- Page 53 and 54: Feyerabend, Paul. 1978. Against met
- Page 55 and 56: Metzger, Wilhelm. 1911. Schelling u
- Page 57 and 58: ———. 1999. Az empirizmus két
- Page 59 and 60: ———. 2000. Kémia III -Szerve
- Page 61 and 62: ———. 2007. The nature of scie
- Page 63 and 64: Conference of the International Soc
- Page 65: a szociologizáló tanulmányt meg