Davidson, Donald ésErnest Lepore. 2006. The essential Davidson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Davt*yan, Vahagn ésLev Ginzburg. 1953. Rassvet v gorakh.Dear, Peter. 1991. The literary structure of scientific argument: historical studies. Philadelphia: Universityof Pennsylvania Press.———. 1995. Cultural History of Science: An Overview with Reflections. Science, Technology, andHuman Values 20 (2):150-170.———. 1995. Discipline & experience: the mathematical way in the scientific revolution, Science and itsconceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.———. 2001. Overdetermination and contingency. In The one culture? A conversation about science,szerk. J. A. Labinger ésH. Collins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.———. 2001. Science Studies as Epistemography. In The one culture? A conversation about science,szerk. J. A. Labinger ésH. Collins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Dear, Peter Robert. 1995. Discipline & experience: the mathematical way in the scientific revolution, Scienceand its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Debus, Allen G. 1965. The English Paracelsians, Oldbourne history of science library. London.———. 1977. The chemical philosophy: Paracelsian science and medicine in the sixteenth and seventeenthcenturies. New York: Science History Publications.———. 1978. Man and nature in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Delfini, Antonio, Giovanna Delfini ésNatalia Ginzburg. 1982. Diari, 1927-1961. 1a ed. Torino:Einaudi.Demeter, Tamás. 2008. Where raionality Is. Phänomenologische Forschungen (Beiheft 3):247-262.Depater, W. A. 1988. Philosophical Papers 1913-1946 - Neurath,O. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 50(2):383-383.Derksen, A. A. 1993. The seven sins of Pseudo-science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24(1):17-42.Descartes, René. 1998. A filozófia alapelvei. Budapest: Osiris.———. 1998. The World and Other Writings (trans. Gaukroger, Stephen). szerk. K. C. Ameriks,Desmond M., Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Detlaf, Tat i ana Antonovna, Anna Samo ilovna Ginzburg ésO. I. Shmal*gauzen. 1981. Razvitieosetrovykh ryb : Sozrevanie *i*ai*t*s, oplodotvorenie, razvitie zarodyshe*i i predlichinok. Moskva:Izd-vo "Nauka".———. 1993. Sturgeon fishes : developmental biology and aquaculture. Berlin ; New York: Springer-Verlag.Donald, Merlin. 1991. Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. 2.[Dr.]. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.———. 1993. Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. 1. paperbacked. Cambridge, Mass.: Havard Univ. Press.———. 2001. Az emberi gondolkodás eredete. Budapest: Osiris.———. 2001. A mind so rare: the evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.Dooley, Brendan. 2003. The Storia Litteraria D'Italia and the Rehabilitation of Jesuit Science,szerk. M. Feingold. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.Dotger, Sharon. 2005. Using theories of epistemic cognition to evaluate the goals for teaching thenature of science. Paper read at 2005 IHPST, at Leeds.Downes, Stephen M. 1993. Socializing Naturalized Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 60(3):452-468.Downing, Lisa. 1998. The status of mechanism in Locke's Essay. The Philosophical Review 107:381-414.Draaisma, Douwe. 2002. Metaforamasina - Az emlékezet egyik lehetséges története. Budapest: Typotex.Du Bois-Reymond, Emil. 1912. Reden. 2 vols. Leipzig: Veit.Ducheyne, Steffen. 2005. Newton's notion and practice of unification. Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science 36 (1):61-78.
———. 2009. Understanding (in) Newton‘s Argument of Universal Gravitation. Journal forGeneral philosophy of Science 40 (2): 227-258.Duck, Michael John. 1993. Goethe's rejection of Newton's Opticks: an analysis of Enthüllung derTheorie Newtons. PhD. Thesis, History of Science and Technology Group, Imperial Collegeof Science Technology and Medicine, London.Duff, Douglas V. ésSimon Ginzburg. 1936. *Herev leha*skir. [Tel-Aviv,.Duhem, Pierre. 1954. The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton UniversityPress.———. 1996. Some reflection on the subject of experimental physics (1894). In Essays in theHistory and Philosophy of Science, szerk. R. Ariew ésP. Barker. Indianapolis, Cambridge:Hackett Publishing Company.———. 2005. A jelenségek megőrzése: értekezés a fizikaelmélet fogalmáról Platóntól Galileiig. Budapest:Kairosz Kiadó.Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie. 1954. The aim and structure of physical theory. Transl. from the 2. ed.Princeton: Univ. Press.———. 1969. To save the phenomena : an essay on the idea of physical theory from Plato to Galileo. Chicago{[u.a.]: Univ. Chicago Press.———. 1991. The origins of statics : the sources of physical theory, Boston studies in the philosophy of science,123. Dordrecht {[u.a.]: Kluwer.Dunbar, Kevin. 2002. Understanding the Role of Cognition in Science: The Science as CategoryFramework. In The Cognitive Basis of Science, szerk. P. Carruthers, S. Stitch ésM. Siegal.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Dupré, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Ebstein, Erich. 1912. Lichtenberg und Goethe über die Theorie der Farben. Archiv für dieGeschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik 3:71-78.———. 1913. Goethe über den Zwischenkiefer. Archiv für die Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften undder Technik 4:167-168.Edels, Samuel Eliezer ben Judah ésEli ezer ben Efrayim Mordekhai Ginzburg. 2009. Sefer Mesilatha-Maharsha : li*ku*tim *al seder ha-parashiyot mi-tokh *hidushe agadot Maharsha *al ha-Shas, levaʼerule-laben divre *Hazal *al pesu*ke ha-Torah. Mahad. 1. ed. Bru*klin, Nyu York:Arts*krol/Masorah.Edexcel Level 3 AS GCE in History and Philosophy and Ethics (Perspectives on Science). 2004 -Nov Draft.Edge, David. 1999. Editorial Postscript. Social Studies of Science 29 (5):790-799.Editors‘ Note. 2005. Journal of the History of Biology 38 (1):1-1.Edmond, Gary ésDavid Mercer. 2006. Anti-social Epistemologies10.1177/0306312706067900. Social Studies of Science 36 (6):843-853.Eemeren, F. H. van, szerk. 2001. Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory. Amsterdam: AmsterdamUniversity Press.Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst ésFrancisca Snoeck Henkemans. 1996. Fundamentals ofargumentation theory: a handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah,N.J.: L. Erlbaum.———. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. London; Mahwah NJ: L. Erlbaum.Eemeren, F. H. van ésPeter Houtlosser, szerk. 2002. Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof ofArgumentation Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Eemeren, F. van and Houtlosser, P. 2005. Strategic Manoeuvring. Studies in Communication Sciences(Special Issue ‗Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction‘).Eemeren, Frans H. van. 1987. Argumentation: across the lines of discipline: proceedings of the Conference onArgumentation 1986, Studies of argumentation in pragmatics and discourse analysis (PDA); 3.Dordrecht: Foris.
- Page 2: Fehér Márta és Péter Ágnes tis
- Page 5 and 6: Édesanyám akadémiai Magyar Ezüs
- Page 7 and 8: A Külső Gyűjtemény tiszteletér
- Page 9 and 10: Az energiakiegyenlítés díjtalan,
- Page 11 and 12: Zemplén Gábor ÁronCartesius és
- Page 13 and 14: másrészt az emberek esetében egy
- Page 15 and 16: a fizika következménye marad, a f
- Page 17 and 18: lásd az értelmezéshez a 2.d. mel
- Page 19 and 20: világban azonosítható és társa
- Page 21 and 22: anyag nyilvánvaló prioritással r
- Page 23 and 24: Huxley meg életútja során továb
- Page 25 and 26: A Vörös Sárkány egyesítéséhe
- Page 27 and 28: C feladat: tanulj meg repülni, mag
- Page 29 and 30: …és az tényleg a Chomsky? rám
- Page 31 and 32: 1)a kikötés, miszerint az anyag n
- Page 33 and 34: olyan közösségek között, akik
- Page 35 and 36: Egy új energetikai képlet meghat
- Page 37 and 38: tagoltsági szinten érvényesülő
- Page 39 and 40: II.: 142). Nagyon hasonlót állít
- Page 41 and 42: Fehér, Láng ésZemplén 2004, 200
- Page 43 and 44: Arbib, Michael A. ésMary B. Hesse.
- Page 45 and 46: Bijker, Wiebe E. 1993. Do Not Despa
- Page 47 and 48: Carnap, Rudolf. 1922. Der Raum. Ein
- Page 49: Custer, Joseph A., Barbara J. Ginzb
- Page 53 and 54: Feyerabend, Paul. 1978. Against met
- Page 55 and 56: Metzger, Wilhelm. 1911. Schelling u
- Page 57 and 58: ———. 1999. Az empirizmus két
- Page 59 and 60: ———. 2000. Kémia III -Szerve
- Page 61 and 62: ———. 2007. The nature of scie
- Page 63 and 64: Conference of the International Soc
- Page 65: a szociologizáló tanulmányt meg