Una metodologia di analisi e confronto per strumenti BPM
Una metodologia di analisi e confronto per strumenti BPM
Una metodologia di analisi e confronto per strumenti BPM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.3 Processo <strong>di</strong> business <strong>di</strong> riferimento . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86<br />
4.4 Categorie <strong>di</strong> <strong>analisi</strong> e criteri <strong>di</strong> valutazione . . . . . . . . . . . 92<br />
4.4.1 Conformità agli standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93<br />
4.4.2 Modellazione del processo <strong>di</strong> business . . . . . . . . . 97<br />
4.4.3 Configurazione <strong>di</strong> un sistema <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . 102<br />
4.4.4 Attivazione del processo <strong>di</strong> business . . . . . . . . . . 108<br />
4.4.5 Analisi del processo <strong>di</strong> business . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113<br />
4.4.6 Usabilità dello strumento <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118<br />
4.4.7 Utenti target <strong>per</strong> l’utilizzo dello strumento <strong>BPM</strong> . . . 121<br />
4.4.8 Riepilogo del framework <strong>di</strong> <strong>analisi</strong> proposto . . . . . . 125<br />
5 Valutazione dei Singoli Strumenti <strong>BPM</strong> 129<br />
5.1 Adobe LiveCycle Enterprise E<strong>di</strong>tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130<br />
5.2 AgilePoint <strong>BPM</strong>S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134<br />
5.3 Avantage <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137<br />
5.4 Billfish <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139<br />
5.5 BizAgi <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142<br />
5.6 Business Process Visual Architect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145<br />
5.7 e<strong>BPM</strong>N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149<br />
5.8 Genexus <strong>BPM</strong>S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152<br />
5.9 IBM WebSphere Dynamic Process E<strong>di</strong>tion . . . . . . . . . . . 154<br />
5.10 iGrafx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157<br />
5.11 Intalio Enterprise E<strong>di</strong>tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160<br />
5.12 j<strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164<br />
5.13 Lombar<strong>di</strong> BluePrint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167<br />
5.14 Metastorm <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170<br />
5.15 Oracle <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173<br />
5.16 Process360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177<br />
5.17 ProcessPAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180<br />
5.18 Questetra <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182<br />
5.19 Savvion <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184<br />
5.20 Tibco Business Stu<strong>di</strong>o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187<br />
5.21 YAWL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191<br />
6 Risultati della Analisi Comparativa 193<br />
6.1 In<strong>di</strong>viduazione Strumenti <strong>BPM</strong>S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194<br />
6.2 Analisi Comparativa dei <strong>BPM</strong>S In<strong>di</strong>viduati . . . . . . . . . . 196<br />
6.2.1 Completezza Rispetto alle Funzionalità . . . . . . . . 196<br />
6.2.2 Target <strong>di</strong> Utenti <strong>di</strong> Riferimento . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200<br />
6.2.3 Usabilità . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203<br />
VIII