16.04.2013 Views

Una metodologia di analisi e confronto per strumenti BPM

Una metodologia di analisi e confronto per strumenti BPM

Una metodologia di analisi e confronto per strumenti BPM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3 Processo <strong>di</strong> business <strong>di</strong> riferimento . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86<br />

4.4 Categorie <strong>di</strong> <strong>analisi</strong> e criteri <strong>di</strong> valutazione . . . . . . . . . . . 92<br />

4.4.1 Conformità agli standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93<br />

4.4.2 Modellazione del processo <strong>di</strong> business . . . . . . . . . 97<br />

4.4.3 Configurazione <strong>di</strong> un sistema <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . 102<br />

4.4.4 Attivazione del processo <strong>di</strong> business . . . . . . . . . . 108<br />

4.4.5 Analisi del processo <strong>di</strong> business . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113<br />

4.4.6 Usabilità dello strumento <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118<br />

4.4.7 Utenti target <strong>per</strong> l’utilizzo dello strumento <strong>BPM</strong> . . . 121<br />

4.4.8 Riepilogo del framework <strong>di</strong> <strong>analisi</strong> proposto . . . . . . 125<br />

5 Valutazione dei Singoli Strumenti <strong>BPM</strong> 129<br />

5.1 Adobe LiveCycle Enterprise E<strong>di</strong>tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130<br />

5.2 AgilePoint <strong>BPM</strong>S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134<br />

5.3 Avantage <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137<br />

5.4 Billfish <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139<br />

5.5 BizAgi <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142<br />

5.6 Business Process Visual Architect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145<br />

5.7 e<strong>BPM</strong>N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149<br />

5.8 Genexus <strong>BPM</strong>S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152<br />

5.9 IBM WebSphere Dynamic Process E<strong>di</strong>tion . . . . . . . . . . . 154<br />

5.10 iGrafx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157<br />

5.11 Intalio Enterprise E<strong>di</strong>tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160<br />

5.12 j<strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164<br />

5.13 Lombar<strong>di</strong> BluePrint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167<br />

5.14 Metastorm <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170<br />

5.15 Oracle <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173<br />

5.16 Process360 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177<br />

5.17 ProcessPAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180<br />

5.18 Questetra <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182<br />

5.19 Savvion <strong>BPM</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184<br />

5.20 Tibco Business Stu<strong>di</strong>o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187<br />

5.21 YAWL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191<br />

6 Risultati della Analisi Comparativa 193<br />

6.1 In<strong>di</strong>viduazione Strumenti <strong>BPM</strong>S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194<br />

6.2 Analisi Comparativa dei <strong>BPM</strong>S In<strong>di</strong>viduati . . . . . . . . . . 196<br />

6.2.1 Completezza Rispetto alle Funzionalità . . . . . . . . 196<br />

6.2.2 Target <strong>di</strong> Utenti <strong>di</strong> Riferimento . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200<br />

6.2.3 Usabilità . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203<br />

VIII

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!