24.04.2015 Views

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Afbeelding 2 Parameter Scheme: Filling - Skin<br />

Afbeelding 3 Pre-stress Derivation: Direct and Indirect Component<br />

<strong>afst</strong>udeer<strong>bundel</strong> faculteit bouwkunde<br />

Afbeelding 5 Reconfigurable Formwork System<br />

concentrating on the individual properties of the two main<br />

components: the (enclosing) skin and the filling. The structural<br />

as well as architectural qualities of vacuumatics are further<br />

explored by means of several small scale models and prototypes,<br />

as well as a material study of the filler elements.<br />

The aim is to gain fundamental understanding in and control<br />

over the underlying design principles so as to be able to<br />

optimise structural assemblies to specific conditions and<br />

required behaviours.<br />

The behaviour of vacuumatic structures depends on the exact<br />

nature of the materials used. Although almost any type of filler<br />

material may be applied with vacuumatics, their enhanced<br />

structural properties in vacuumatic state are essential, since this<br />

determines the final capacity of the structure with regard to<br />

strength, stiffness and stability (and therefore safety).<br />

The vacuum pressure acting on the covering foils causes this<br />

skin to be tightly wrapped around the surface of the filler<br />

elements, hence resulting in a pre-stress of the vacuumatic<br />

structure. The skin in particular seems to be of big importance<br />

to the structural potential of vacuumatics, since it not only<br />

ensures the structure’s integrity (as it provides the essential<br />

air-tightness), its deformation also largely determines the<br />

distribution of the pre-stress throughout the structure.<br />

The skin deformation is mainly determined by the elasticity of<br />

the skin material, and to some extend by the compression<br />

(and thus shrinkage) of the filling. The pre-stress force acting on<br />

each (granular) filler element is found to be divided into a direct<br />

and an indirect component.<br />

The ability to adjust and control the reconfigurability of the filler<br />

elements (and thus the flexibility of the structure) by means of<br />

varying vacuum pressure results in the so called “reversibility”<br />

of the rigidifying process, enabling vacuumatic structures to be<br />

shaped over and over again.<br />

Afbeelding 6 “New” Shapes in Concrete<br />

The original “flexible” behaviour of vacuumatics in un-deflated<br />

(or “re-flated”) state opens up many possibilities with respect to<br />

the relatively low-tech realisation of free-form designs. In order<br />

to literally mould vacuumatic structures into a certain desired<br />

shape, some sort of morphological tooling is required that forces<br />

the filler elements into their “final” configuration.<br />

This process might be somewhat similar to the formwork with<br />

the production of concrete structures, but especially the ability<br />

to locally adjust the geometry has great potential with respect to<br />

its effectiveness and implementation into the current building<br />

industry.<br />

The hazard of damaging the enclosing skin and subsequently<br />

jeopardising the structural integrity of vacuumatics remains<br />

probably the biggest obstruction of introducing these structures<br />

into the current building industry as independent, primary and<br />

“permanent” load-bearing structures. On the other hand, this<br />

temporality and the advantageous characteristics of vacuumatics<br />

(the ability to be “free-formed”, to be adapted, to create a degree<br />

of randomness and to be repeatedly stabilised) seem to provide<br />

the “ideal” boundary conditions for a truly flexible, re-usable and<br />

most importantly reconfigurable moulding technique for the<br />

production of complex shapes and textures in concrete.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!