24.04.2015 Views

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2 Model rectangular building<br />

Figure 3 Model bubble<br />

Both models were simulated in Radiance and this resulted in<br />

the conclusion that regarding the overall daylighting quality<br />

none of the buildings is significantly better than the other one.<br />

The daylight distribution is better in the bubble, due to the<br />

possibility of the different placement of the openings.<br />

In a simulation with a sunny sky with sun glare occurs in both<br />

buildings in the compared north-facing viewpoints, caused by<br />

reflections on the wall, on the floor or on reveals. In the southfacing<br />

viewpoints glare is also caused by the sky.<br />

From the simulations with the overcast sky is concluded that<br />

glare will occur at a free field luminance of 14024 lux in the<br />

bubble and of 14937 lux in the rectangular building. Regarding<br />

the luminances, these are variable depending on the sky used in<br />

the simulation and the position of the window. None of the buildings<br />

is distinctively better in this criterion.<br />

Regarding the luminance ratios it is depending on the type of<br />

sky which building is better. In an overcast sky situation the<br />

luminance ratios are lower in the bubble; in a situation with a<br />

sunny sky the rectangular building gives lower luminance ratios.<br />

But in both situations with the north-facing viewpoints the<br />

requirement is exceeded, due to low luminances on the wall.<br />

The vertical illuminance turned out to be too complex to make a<br />

fair comparison.<br />

In the end some recommendations are made regarding<br />

solutions for the problems concerning daylighting quality and<br />

regarding interesting additional research. Solutions for the glare<br />

in the north-facing positions are changing the angle under<br />

which the window is placed and increasing the absorption factor<br />

of the reveals. A solution for the problems concerning the<br />

luminance ratio is to increase the luminances on the wall by<br />

artificial lighting. Furthermore the suggestion is done to create a<br />

tool for designers to make them aware of the influence of the<br />

sun in order to make the right decision regarding the<br />

positioning of the openings during the design process.<br />

In order to find a way to suppress brightness in an architectural<br />

acceptable way in buildings with curved glazing an overview is<br />

made of existing glare protection and sun-shading systems.<br />

These systems are divided into four groups: external systems,<br />

glass systems, systems in the cavity of the glazing and internal<br />

systems. A selection of these systems was made based on their<br />

applicability to double curved glazing. The selected systems are<br />

judged based on seven criteria: the influence on the indoor<br />

climate, the adjustability of the system, maintenance, the<br />

manufacturing procedure, the light transmission, the costs and<br />

whether the system is active or passive. This resulted in the so<br />

called switchable systems being the most suitable systems for<br />

double curved glazing. Switchable systems are photochromic,<br />

thermochromic, thermotropic and electrochromic glass and<br />

gas-chromatic systems. Of these systems electrochromic glass is<br />

chosen to evaluate its influence by implementing it in the<br />

simulation models.<br />

Electrochromic glass has, even in a clear state, a significantly<br />

lower transmittance than normal clear glass. This has a transmittance<br />

of 0.8, while the transmittance of electrochromic glass<br />

is 0.5 in clear state and 0.15 in shaded state. This resulted in a<br />

large decrease of the amount of light entering the building.<br />

Where in the original situation the building was qualified in an<br />

overcast sky situation as being well lit by daylight, the<br />

qualification in case of clear electrochromic glass degraded to<br />

moderately lit and in case of shaded electrochromic glass to<br />

dark. Nevertheless, the exceeding of the luminance ratios still<br />

occurred in the overcast sky situation, because the luminance on<br />

the wall also decreased due to the smaller amount of light entering<br />

the building.<br />

The recommendations regarding glare protection and sun-shading<br />

in buildings with curved façades are to develop shading<br />

scenarios for different times and days. In these scenarios only<br />

the windows for which shading is necessary at that time are<br />

shaded. Concerning further research it is recommended to look<br />

at the implementation of double curved glass in the<br />

manufacturing procedures of glare protection and sun-shading<br />

systems.<br />

<strong>afst</strong>udeer<strong>bundel</strong> faculteit bouwkunde<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!