24.04.2015 Views

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

afst.bundel 8 MEI 07 - Technische Universiteit Eindhoven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2 Mixing range of Dynamic Lighting system and the CIE daylight<br />

locus<br />

also disrupt the required CCT-curve.<br />

Based on this observation, the aim of this project was to<br />

quantify the amount and colour of daylight that reaches the<br />

work plane of a standard open plan office over the course of one<br />

year, and to assess whether or not it is possible to maintain the<br />

Dynamic Lighting curves. This data was obtained for different<br />

window orientations and sizes, and repeated for four geographical<br />

locations in Europe (approximately 1,000 km apart).<br />

Automatic blinds blocked out any direct sunlight, and standard<br />

clear glazing was applied.<br />

The amount of daylight was accurately simulated with DAYSIM,<br />

an add-on program to Radiance that efficiently calculates the<br />

work plane illuminance for any location and geometry.<br />

Additionally, one-year measurements of the daylight CCT in<br />

Lyon, France (courtesy of ENTPE) were processed and analysed<br />

to obtain factual values for the bandwidth of daylight CCT over<br />

the course of one year. In these measurements, the daylight<br />

CCT was logged every 10 minutes for 12 months and for four<br />

orientations.<br />

After the amount and colour of daylight had been quantified,<br />

day-by-day curves were constructed that evaluated: (1) how much<br />

the lighting system could be dimmed in response to the influx<br />

of daylight, i.e. the daily energy savings; and (2) if it was<br />

possible to maintain the CCT-curve by adapting the CCT of the<br />

lighting system in response to the colour of daylight. These<br />

results were then contrasted to a less complex energy saving<br />

solution: time switching, which simply turns off the lighting<br />

system when a threshold-value is crossed. From this analysis<br />

several implementation strategies for Dynamic Lighting systems<br />

in daylit offices were put together.<br />

Conclusions<br />

First, it was found that with daylight responsive control the<br />

Dynamic Lighting illuminance curve could be maintained very<br />

Figure 3 Calculation of average illumination of the control area of a light<br />

sensor<br />

well in the second and third zone behind the window over a<br />

long period of time. Energy savings up to 67% are achievable in<br />

these zones. However, in the first zone behind the window it<br />

was found to be much more difficult to maintain the illuminance<br />

curve. This is because the system is dimmed completely over<br />

long periods of time, resulting in an illuminance curve that<br />

follows the colour and luminance of the sky. It is therefore<br />

better to use a different lighting concept for this zone, for<br />

instance a regular 500 lx lighting solution. It is not possible to<br />

maintain the correlated colour temperature curve by mixing<br />

daylight with the artificial light. This curve is disrupted too<br />

much by daylight to maintain over long periods of time.<br />

Second, the results of this study indicate that with time switching,<br />

comprising a much simpler modification of the original<br />

lighting system, it is also possible to use Dynamic Lighting in<br />

daylit offices. This method does not use real-time measurements<br />

but uses a pre-set condition for each month: the lighting system<br />

either provides the Dynamic Lighting curve for the whole<br />

month, or it provides a constant output of 500 lx.<br />

This resulted in far lower annual energy savings (up to 12%) for<br />

the second and third zone behind the window. Similarly to the<br />

first strategy, it is also better to use a regular lighting solution<br />

for the zone directly behind the window since this the Dynamic<br />

Lighting curve cannot be realised for the larger part of the year.<br />

Also, it is not possible to maintain the required CCT curve.<br />

In general, therefore, it can be concluded that Dynamic Lighting<br />

can be successfully implemented in daylit offices bearing in<br />

mind that: (1) it cannot be used in zones directly behind the<br />

window, and (2) the correlated colour temperature cannot be<br />

controlled. With a simple modification of the original system it<br />

is possible to achieve small energy savings. A drawback of this<br />

method is that the illuminance curve is always distorted by<br />

daylight. With a more complex modification of the original<br />

system it is possible to achieve larger energy savings, while<br />

maintaining the illuminance curve very accurately.<br />

<strong>afst</strong>udeer<strong>bundel</strong> faculteit bouwkunde<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!