1,9mm ass. dent. 3,71mm ass. esq. 0,30mm ass. dent. E.M 55,00mm 54,51mm 0,49mm ass. dent. E.T.S 53,71mm 53,18mm 0,53mm ass. dent. J.B.N 60,63mm 60,45mm 0,18mm ass. dent. L.A.S 55,46mm 50,66mm 4,80mm ass. esq. L.F.S 59,57mm 60,02mm 0,45mm ass. dent. L.L 55,19mm 55,27mm 0,08mm ass. dent. M.A.N 66,06mm 66,81mm 0.75mm ass. dent. N.S.A 57,58mm 55,85mm 1,73mm ass. dent. R.A.F 53,82mm 54,42mm 0,60mm ass. dent. S.B.C 57,24mm 57,20mm 0,04 ass. dent. S.N.B 53,15mm 51,87mm 1,28mm ass. dent. T.B.L 64,44mm 60,71mm 3,73mm ass. esq. 49,70mm 43,33mm 6,37mm ass. esq. 54,52mm 51,77mm 2,75mm ass. esq. 44,50mm 48,81mm 4,31mm ass. esq. 49,88mm 50,87mm 0,99mm ass. dent 48,51mm 48,58mm 0,07mm ass. dent. 48,45mm 47,48mm 0,97mm ass. dent. 49,44mm 47,38mm 2,06mm ass. esq. 53,72mm 51,40mm 2,32mm ass. esq. 53,86mm 55,02mm 1,16mm ass. dent. 45,15mm 45,00mm 0,15mm ass. dent. 46,42mm 42,21mm 4,21mm ass. esq. 49,40mm 48,36mm 1,04mm ass.dent. 92,46mm 87,60mm 4,86mm ass. esq. 99,24mm 97,71mm 1,53mm ass. dent. 90,91mm 95,24mm 4,33mm ass. esq. 92,19mm 92,27mm 0,08mm ass. dent. 99,02mm 100,23mm 1,21mm ass. dent. 91,71mm 88,54mm 3,17mm ass. esq. 104,20mm 103,61mm 0,59mm ass. dent. 101,39mm 98,46mm 2,93mm ass. esq. 99,38mm 100,92mm 1,54mm ass. esq. 90,65mm 90,11mm 0,54mm ass. dent. 87,15mm 84,58mm 2,57mm ass. esq. 101,89mm 98,83mm 3,06mm ass. esq. Assimetria Esquelética: 17-21 / 28-23 21-22 / 23-22 17-22 / 22-28 8 15 9 Assimetria Dentária: 17-21 / 28-23 21-22 / 23-22 17-22 / 22-28 22 15 21 48
49 8 REFERÊNCIAS 1.Alavi DG, BeGole EA, Schneider BJ. Facial and dental arch asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93(1):38-46. 3.Angle EH. Malocclusion of the teeth. Philadelphia: S.S. White; 1907. 28.Araújo TM, Wilhelm RS, Almeida MA.Skeletal and dental arch asymmetries in Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994;18(3):181-5. 37.Azevedo ARP, Janson G, Henriques JFC, Freitas MR. Evaluation of asymmetries between subjects with Class II subdivision and apparent facial asymmetry and those with normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(3):376-83. 10.Bart RS, Kopf AW. Hemifacial atrophy. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1978;4(12):908-9. 31.Baskin NH, Cisneros GJ. A comparison of two computer cephalometric programs. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:231-3. 6.Bishara SE, Burkey OS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):89-98. 13.Boter E. A common form of facial asymmetry in the newborn infant: its etiology ad orthodontic significance. Am J Orthod. 1953;39:895-9. 41.Bussab WO, Morettin PA. Estatística básica. São Paulo: Saraiva; 2006. 16.Cheney EA. Dentofacial asymmetries and their clinical significance. Am J Orthod. 1961;47(11):814-29. 5.Erickson GE, Waite DE. Mandibular asymmetry. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89:1369-73. 9.Eubanks RJ. Surgical correction of masseter muscle hypertrophy associated with unilateral prognathism: report of case. J Oral Surg. 1957;15:66-69. 4.Fischer B. Asymmetries of the dentofacial complex. Angle Orthod. 1954;24:179-92. 42.Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2ed. New York: John Wiley; 1981. 33.Fonseca RJ. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Pennsylvania: W. B. Saunders Company; 2000. 7.Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. The meaning of bilateral asymmetry the permanent dentition. Angle Orthod. 1966;36(1):55-62. 18.Gianelly AA, Paul A.A procedure for midline correction. Am J Orthod. 1970;58:264-7.
- Page 1 and 2:
LEANDRO KFOURI MARTINS CERQUEIRA AN
- Page 3 and 4:
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO PAULO
- Page 5 and 6:
A minha esposa Ronise, Pelos moment
- Page 7 and 8:
Ao Meu Pai “in memorian”, Minha
- Page 9 and 10:
A minha cunhada Milleni, Pelos mome
- Page 11 and 12:
SUMÁRIO Dedicatória .............
- Page 13 and 14: Figura 13. Distribuição dos indiv
- Page 15 and 16: Lista de abreviaturas e símbolos I
- Page 17 and 18: 1 INTRODUÇÃO Os conceitos aplicad
- Page 19 and 20: 2 REVISÃO DA LITERATURA As maloclu
- Page 21 and 22: Letzer et al. (17) defenderam a tes
- Page 23 and 24: obtida uma telerradiografia frontal
- Page 25 and 26: Bishara et al. (6) as assimetrias d
- Page 27 and 28: determinar se ela é esquelética,
- Page 29 and 30: da linha média inferior para o lad
- Page 31 and 32: 3.1 Desenho do estudo 15 3 MÉTODOS
- Page 33 and 34: 3.3.1 Posicionamento do indivíduo
- Page 35 and 36: 35 - Ponto mais proeminente na pare
- Page 37 and 38: 3.5 Medida adotada para diagnostica
- Page 39 and 40: Em todas as conclusões obtidas atr
- Page 41 and 42: Cerca de 21 (70,0%) indivíduos era
- Page 43 and 44: Tabela 4 - Distribuição dos indiv
- Page 45 and 46: Tabela 6 - Distribuição dos indiv
- Page 47 and 48: Tabela 8 - Distribuição dos indiv
- Page 49 and 50: Figura 15 - Perfis individuais das
- Page 51 and 52: Neste trabalho o maior objetivo foi
- Page 53 and 54: Para que se tenha um bom e adequado
- Page 55 and 56: 39 6 CONCLUSÕES Ao se avaliar os r
- Page 57 and 58: Anexo 2 - Termo de Consentimento Li
- Page 59 and 60: claro também que minha participaç
- Page 61 and 62: 45 B.C.A 52,47mm 49,91mm 49,04mm 56
- Page 63: Anexo 5 - Medidas das diferenças d
- Page 67 and 68: 29.O’Byrn BL, Sadowsky C, Schneid
- Page 69 and 70: APÊNDICE O Boxplot é uma represen