16. Hays, K. Judge Accepts BP Blast Deal Over Victims' Objections. – Houston Chronicle, 12.03.09. Available: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl /business/energy/6307750.html, 25.03.09. 17. Justiitsministri ettekanne Riigikogus „Kriminaalpoliitika arengusuundade aastani 2010“ täitmise kohta 2008. aastal. Arvutivõrgus. Kättesaadav: http://www.just.ee/40457, 17.05.09. 18. Kaminer, W. Victims Versus Suspects. – The American Prospect, 20.11.02. Available: http://www.prospect.org/cs/articlesarticle=victims_versus_suspects, 06.04.09. 19. Kass, M. Laiksoo peab kolm kuud trellide taga veetma. – Postimees, 03.11.08. Arvutivõrgus. Kättesaadav: http://www.postimees.ee/id=45833, 22.03.09. 20. Kergandberg, E. Sillaots, M. Kriminaalmenetlus. Tallinn: Juura, 2006. 21. Kriminaalementluse seadustiku eelnõu 594 SE I seletuskiri. Arvutivõrgus. Kättesaadav: http://web.riigikogu.ee/ems/saros-bin/mgetdocitemid=003674541& login=proov&password=&system=ems&server=ragne11, 06.04.09. 22. Lerner, M. J. Miller, D. T. Just World Research and the Attribution Process: Looking Back and Ahead. – Psychological Bulletin, 1978, Vol 85, No 5, p 1030 ff. 23. O’Hara, E. A. Victim Participation in the Criminal Process. – Journal of Law and Policy, 2005, Vol 13, No 1, p 229 ff. 24. O’Hear, M. M. Punishment, Democracy, and Victims. – Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2006, Vol 19, No 1, p 1 ff. 25. Packer, H. Two Models of the Criminal Process. – University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1964, Vol 113, No 1, p 1 ff. 26. Roach, K. Four Models of the Criminal Process. – The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1999, Vol 89, No 2, p 671 ff. 27. Roth, E. Prosecution Service Function within the Hungarian Criminal Justice System. – European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2008, Vol 14, No 2-3, p 289 ff. 28. Senate Approves Kyl/Feinstein Crime Victims Rights Bill. – News from Senator Feinstein, 22.04.2004. Available: http://feinstein.senate.gov/04Releases/r-vicrightsvote.pdf, 13.05.09. 29. Stickels, J. The Victim Satisfaction Model of the Criminal Justice System. – Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice Research & Education, 2008, Vol 2, No 1, p 1 ff. 30. The Essays of Francis Bacon. Of Revenge. Available: http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/bacon/bacon_essays.html, 06.04.09. 31. United States v Bernard L. Madoff. Available: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys/madoff.html, 26.03.09. 58
32. Victims’ and Defendants’ Rights: Can They Be Reconciled – Legal Action Group Briefing Paper, April 2005. Available: http://www.rethinking.org.uk/informed/ lagbriefing.pdf, 06.04.09. 33. Vidmar, N. Retribution and Revenge. – In Joseph Sanders & V. Lee Hamilton (Eds), Handbook of Justice Research in Law, 2000, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, p 31 ff. 34. Von Hirsch, A. Jareborg, N. Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living-Standard Analysis. – Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, 1991, Vol 11, No 1, p 1 ff. 35. Wolfgang, M. E. Basic Concepts in Victimological Theory: Individualization of the Victim. – In H. J. Schneider (Ed), The Victim in International Perspective, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1982, p 47 ff. 59