23.02.2015 Aufrufe

Sicherheit und Risiko

St.Gallen Business Review Winter 2012

St.Gallen Business Review
Winter 2012

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

ESPRIT St.Gallen Business Review<br />

The European Union: History<br />

and Institutional Objectives<br />

Scarred by two costly and tragic world wars and<br />

newly threatened by a steely and increasingly unfriendly<br />

set of Eastern neighbors, six Western European<br />

nations – France, Germany, Belgium, Italy,<br />

Luxembourg, and the Netherlands – fo<strong>und</strong>ed the<br />

European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) in 1951<br />

and signed a treaty that would, in the words of the<br />

EU, “tie their coal and steel industries so closely together<br />

that they could never again go to war against<br />

each other.“ This justification – that the predecessor<br />

to the modern-day European Union was created out<br />

of a drive for peace – conveniently sidesteps two significant<br />

issues. First, the ECSC was established, in<br />

part, to prevent a renewed rise in German dominance<br />

by linking the country’s economic fate in key sectors<br />

to those of neighboring countries. Second, the ECSC’s<br />

formation stemmed from its members’ collective realization<br />

that no single European nation-state was<br />

powerful enough, by itself, to militarily subdue or<br />

control its neighbors. In a post-war environment dominated<br />

by the militarily and economically powerful<br />

United States, the ECSC was an economic bloc forged<br />

out of necessity in order to remain competitive with<br />

the so-called superpowers. Peace was not its primary<br />

function; the EU was, from its inception, designed to<br />

yield economic returns for its member states, themselves<br />

the strongest economies in Western Europe.<br />

During the subsequent decades, the multiplying<br />

and strengthening economic ties between Europe’s<br />

nation-states began to gesture toward a broader program<br />

of continental integration. In 1968, the European<br />

Economic Community (EEC; the successor<br />

to the ECSC, created by the Treaty<br />

of Rome in 1957) abolished trade quotas<br />

and tariffs but left non-tariff barriers in<br />

place, thereby easing the flow of goods and<br />

services between member states while preserving<br />

their economic sovereignty. As the<br />

EEC steadily attracted new members – including<br />

Greece, in 1981 –, more and more<br />

European countries became invested in the<br />

fortunes of the common market. Following<br />

the adoption of the Schengen Agreement<br />

in 1985, its signatory governments passed<br />

some 280 legislative measures to create<br />

the institutional infrastructure of the single<br />

market, a process which was largely complete<br />

by 1993, when the Treaty of Maastricht<br />

formally established the European<br />

Union and its leaders began to speak of<br />

a sea-change in terms of a supra-national<br />

European identity. “Euro optimism” began<br />

to infuse the continent’s cultural discourse. There was<br />

a sense that the era of competing Great Powers had<br />

finally ceded to a post-nationalist paradigm characterized<br />

by European cosmopolitanism. L’Auberge Espagnole,<br />

the 2002 French film which romanticizes a<br />

French graduate student’s experiences during an Erasmus<br />

exchange fellowship in Barcelona, is perhaps the<br />

most well-known piece of popular culture capturing<br />

the sentiment of that period.<br />

But the tender moments of cultural, romantic,<br />

and intellectual exchange between a French student<br />

and his newfo<strong>und</strong> Belgian, British, Danish, Spanish,<br />

German, and Italian friends belie the disparate opportunities<br />

and outcomes provided for in the Treaty of<br />

Maastricht and the EU’s investment of political and<br />

economic clout in its most economically competitive<br />

member states. The common market created clear<br />

winners and losers, and winning or losing was not left<br />

to chance. Thus, inequality was built into the blueprint<br />

of modern Europe.<br />

Who Benefits from the<br />

Common Market?<br />

Earlier this year, Germany’s economy garnered<br />

praise from the national press and political parties<br />

for once again attaining the title of “Exportweltmeister”<br />

(export world champion), as it re-surpassed China<br />

in having the world’s largest positive trade balance.<br />

With robust manufacturing, engineering, technology<br />

and financial sectors, Germany continues to export<br />

more goods and services than any other country in the<br />

world. But its much-heralded success as “Exportweltmeister”<br />

is not simply the reward of innate or histori-<br />

Trade balances of select EU nations<br />

Source: OECD Economic Outlook, Vol. 2012, No. 91-1<br />

(Statistical Annex Table 47: Trade balances for goods and services).<br />

Winter 2012 37

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!