Sierra Planning and Management Velodrome - Town of Milton
Sierra Planning and Management Velodrome - Town of Milton
Sierra Planning and Management Velodrome - Town of Milton
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Sierra</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> & <strong>Management</strong><br />
46<br />
46 <strong>Velodrome</strong> Business Plan – <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Milton</strong><br />
Given the volume <strong>of</strong> space that the velodrome comprises, <strong>and</strong> the realities <strong>of</strong> the Canadian winter, the<br />
utility cost represents a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the operating budget. They are also subject therefore to<br />
potential risk depending on the change in prices for heating <strong>and</strong> cooling <strong>of</strong> the building. The analysis<br />
estimates as a base case an average <strong>of</strong> $3.50 per square foot <strong>of</strong> GFA resulting in some $420,000 in annual<br />
utility costs. All expenses <strong>and</strong> revenues are subject to a 3% annual escalation. However, should utility rates<br />
increase by 10% for example, this would affect the operating costs by increments <strong>of</strong> $40,000 annually. It is<br />
therefore in the interest in the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Milton</strong> to secure the necessary long-term agreements with respect<br />
to utility rates <strong>and</strong>/or provide a range <strong>of</strong> measures which tend to reduce utility costs compared with typical<br />
municipal facilities. To that end, we underst<strong>and</strong> that the <strong>Town</strong> is currently investigating opportunities for<br />
linking the <strong>Velodrome</strong> to a broader district heating infrastructure project that will be based on the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> geothermal technology. Should this be successfully achieved, this may reduce the risk<br />
associated with utility costs for the building <strong>and</strong> may result in a significant cost savings. As to the quantum<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cost savings <strong>and</strong> any upfront capital costs necessary to create the infrastructure, this specific<br />
information is not available at this time.<br />
7.3.8 SUMMARY OF SCENARIOS<br />
Scenario 1:<br />
Lower revenue potential, higher<br />
operating costs<br />
� Municipal Ownership <strong>and</strong><br />
operation through a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
corporation<br />
Business Plan | January 2012<br />
Scenario 2:<br />
Moderate revenue base<br />
� Municipal Ownership <strong>and</strong><br />
Operation through a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
Corporation<br />
� No change compared with<br />
Scenario 1 for track dem<strong>and</strong><br />
or space utilization<br />
� Higher staffing costs � Track rental rates consistent<br />
with levels previously agreed<br />
� Small commercial tenant lease<br />
space opportunities (CCA only)<br />
<strong>and</strong> rental <strong>of</strong> fitness space to<br />
3 rd party operator with no<br />
access to performance share<br />
<strong>of</strong> revenues from fitness<br />
centre operation<br />
� Revenues from events based<br />
solely on rental <strong>of</strong> facility<br />
� Lower estimates <strong>of</strong> achievable<br />
track rental rate<br />
� Higher risks associated with<br />
revenues from the infield<br />
compared to Scenarios 2 <strong>and</strong> 3<br />
� Small food concession owned<br />
<strong>and</strong> operated by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Milton</strong><br />
to by major cycling bodies<br />
� Labour costs reflect the<br />
specification <strong>of</strong> this building<br />
as a high performance centre<br />
� Ticketed events revenue<br />
based on 10% gate revenue<br />
plus base rent<br />
� Municipality operates fitness<br />
centre<br />
� Food concession tended to<br />
by private operator;<br />
municipal share is 50% <strong>of</strong><br />
gross margin<br />
� 2,000 sq.ft. <strong>of</strong> tenant space<br />
(assumed to be CCA or other<br />
cycling body)<br />
Scenario 3:<br />
Higher revenue potential<br />
� Municipal Ownership <strong>and</strong><br />
Operation through a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
Corporation<br />
� Builds upon Scenario 2 but<br />
with modest incremental<br />
increase in track rental rates<br />
� Lower risk associated with<br />
achieving infield revenues<br />
� High leasable tenant space<br />
(3,000 sq. ft.)<br />
� Retail concession space <strong>of</strong><br />
2,000 sq. ft.