23.02.2013 Views

Sierra Planning and Management Velodrome - Town of Milton

Sierra Planning and Management Velodrome - Town of Milton

Sierra Planning and Management Velodrome - Town of Milton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sierra</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> & <strong>Management</strong><br />

46<br />

46 <strong>Velodrome</strong> Business Plan – <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Milton</strong><br />

Given the volume <strong>of</strong> space that the velodrome comprises, <strong>and</strong> the realities <strong>of</strong> the Canadian winter, the<br />

utility cost represents a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the operating budget. They are also subject therefore to<br />

potential risk depending on the change in prices for heating <strong>and</strong> cooling <strong>of</strong> the building. The analysis<br />

estimates as a base case an average <strong>of</strong> $3.50 per square foot <strong>of</strong> GFA resulting in some $420,000 in annual<br />

utility costs. All expenses <strong>and</strong> revenues are subject to a 3% annual escalation. However, should utility rates<br />

increase by 10% for example, this would affect the operating costs by increments <strong>of</strong> $40,000 annually. It is<br />

therefore in the interest in the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Milton</strong> to secure the necessary long-term agreements with respect<br />

to utility rates <strong>and</strong>/or provide a range <strong>of</strong> measures which tend to reduce utility costs compared with typical<br />

municipal facilities. To that end, we underst<strong>and</strong> that the <strong>Town</strong> is currently investigating opportunities for<br />

linking the <strong>Velodrome</strong> to a broader district heating infrastructure project that will be based on the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> geothermal technology. Should this be successfully achieved, this may reduce the risk<br />

associated with utility costs for the building <strong>and</strong> may result in a significant cost savings. As to the quantum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cost savings <strong>and</strong> any upfront capital costs necessary to create the infrastructure, this specific<br />

information is not available at this time.<br />

7.3.8 SUMMARY OF SCENARIOS<br />

Scenario 1:<br />

Lower revenue potential, higher<br />

operating costs<br />

� Municipal Ownership <strong>and</strong><br />

operation through a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

corporation<br />

Business Plan | January 2012<br />

Scenario 2:<br />

Moderate revenue base<br />

� Municipal Ownership <strong>and</strong><br />

Operation through a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

Corporation<br />

� No change compared with<br />

Scenario 1 for track dem<strong>and</strong><br />

or space utilization<br />

� Higher staffing costs � Track rental rates consistent<br />

with levels previously agreed<br />

� Small commercial tenant lease<br />

space opportunities (CCA only)<br />

<strong>and</strong> rental <strong>of</strong> fitness space to<br />

3 rd party operator with no<br />

access to performance share<br />

<strong>of</strong> revenues from fitness<br />

centre operation<br />

� Revenues from events based<br />

solely on rental <strong>of</strong> facility<br />

� Lower estimates <strong>of</strong> achievable<br />

track rental rate<br />

� Higher risks associated with<br />

revenues from the infield<br />

compared to Scenarios 2 <strong>and</strong> 3<br />

� Small food concession owned<br />

<strong>and</strong> operated by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Milton</strong><br />

to by major cycling bodies<br />

� Labour costs reflect the<br />

specification <strong>of</strong> this building<br />

as a high performance centre<br />

� Ticketed events revenue<br />

based on 10% gate revenue<br />

plus base rent<br />

� Municipality operates fitness<br />

centre<br />

� Food concession tended to<br />

by private operator;<br />

municipal share is 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

gross margin<br />

� 2,000 sq.ft. <strong>of</strong> tenant space<br />

(assumed to be CCA or other<br />

cycling body)<br />

Scenario 3:<br />

Higher revenue potential<br />

� Municipal Ownership <strong>and</strong><br />

Operation through a nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

Corporation<br />

� Builds upon Scenario 2 but<br />

with modest incremental<br />

increase in track rental rates<br />

� Lower risk associated with<br />

achieving infield revenues<br />

� High leasable tenant space<br />

(3,000 sq. ft.)<br />

� Retail concession space <strong>of</strong><br />

2,000 sq. ft.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!