02.03.2013 Views

Measurement of the Z boson cross-section in - Harvard University ...

Measurement of the Z boson cross-section in - Harvard University ...

Measurement of the Z boson cross-section in - Harvard University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3: Lum<strong>in</strong>osity <strong>Measurement</strong> at <strong>the</strong> LHC and <strong>in</strong> ATLAS 89<br />

threshold is 2.5 GeV for pions and 10 MeV for electrons. The tubes are read out by<br />

PMTs. When <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stantaneous lum<strong>in</strong>osity <strong>in</strong>creases above 10 33 cm −2 s −1 , <strong>the</strong> plan<br />

is to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> tubes on each side to 168, and to replace <strong>the</strong> PMTs by<br />

sc<strong>in</strong>tillation fibers [23].<br />

The fast response time <strong>of</strong> LUCID (≈ 3 ns) allows it to measure bunch-by-bunch<br />

lum<strong>in</strong>osity. Signals due to secondary particles are m<strong>in</strong>imal ow<strong>in</strong>g to two factors:<br />

firstly, <strong>the</strong> Cherenkov threshold suppresses low-energy particles; secondly, <strong>the</strong> projec-<br />

tive geometry leads to a shorter path length <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gas for secondary particles than<br />

for primary particles from <strong>the</strong> IP. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> Cherenkov photons is directly<br />

proportional to <strong>the</strong> path length <strong>in</strong> gas, secondaries produce a relatively small signal.<br />

LUCID measurements must be calibrated with absolute lum<strong>in</strong>osity measurements<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> parallel from some o<strong>the</strong>r source. Once LUCID has been calibrated, its<br />

measurements can be used over a wide range <strong>of</strong> beam conditions that may not be<br />

suitable for absolute measurement devices such as ALFA. As discussed before, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

2010 run <strong>the</strong> calibration to absolute lum<strong>in</strong>osity was done us<strong>in</strong>g beam parameters.<br />

Upon calibration, <strong>the</strong> overall accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lum<strong>in</strong>osity measurement was 11%, <strong>the</strong><br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant contribution com<strong>in</strong>g from beam current measurement [94]. From 2011<br />

onwards, <strong>the</strong> calibration is expected to use ALFA measurements, with an achievable<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> ≈3%. Over <strong>the</strong> long term, physics processes with well-measured <strong>cross</strong>-<br />

<strong>section</strong>s can also be used for <strong>the</strong> calibration, but <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> this method depends<br />

on <strong>the</strong>oretical uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cross</strong>-<strong>section</strong>s, as discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 1.5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!