Principios de Taxonomia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
86j 4 What are Traits in Taxonomy?<br />
against reductionism in biological science has supported the view for the whole.<br />
Entire organs are consi<strong>de</strong>red to be more than the sum of their parts, and this world<br />
view may have favored the aim to conceive organs and organisms as whole entities<br />
that should not compartmentalized.<br />
4.10<br />
The DNA Barcoding Approach – is Taxonomy Nothing more than Phylogenetic<br />
Distance?<br />
The technique of barcoding refers to the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of short DNA sequence<br />
sections, mainly a 648-bp region of the cytochrome c oxidase I gene (COI) of<br />
mitochondria, with the intent of <strong>de</strong>termining taxonomic classifications. These<br />
sequences are compared among the organisms. From the extent of sequence<br />
differences, a conclusion as to the species i<strong>de</strong>ntification of the organisms is drawn.<br />
Undoubtedly, the differences in DNA sequences indicate the differences in the<br />
phylogenetic distances among the respective organisms. However, the genetic<br />
distances between groups of organisms are not the same phenomenon as the species<br />
differences (Chapter 6). Many studies have documented that reproductively wellseparated<br />
species hardly differ genetically, and in turn, there exist species with large<br />
intraspecific genetic heterogeneity. Hence, barcoding does not lead to the same<br />
entities as other species concepts. Because the barco<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>termines only the genetic<br />
distance among groups of organisms, it inevitably comprises all of the evolutionarily<br />
young species as a single common species, and it subdivi<strong>de</strong>s many old species into<br />
separate species.<br />
The method of DNA barcoding has been highly praised. It is advertised as a<br />
renaissance in taxonomy (Miller, 2007) or as taxonomy of the twenty first century<br />
(Steinke and Bre<strong>de</strong>, 2006). Its application to butterflies (Hebert et al., 2004), birds<br />
(Hebert et al., 2004) (www.plosbiology.org) and many other organisms led to the<br />
discovery of many supposedly new species. One of the first publications of Hebert<br />
and colleagues (Hebert et al., 2004) on the Central American Hesperid butterfly<br />
Astraptes fulgerator has the promising title Ten species in one: DNA barcoding<br />
reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator.<br />
However, the cogent question is whether all of these promises and visions can<br />
withstand a stanch reconsi<strong>de</strong>ration of the biological units that are truly i<strong>de</strong>ntified by<br />
the barcoding method. One year before the barcoding method was introduced, J.<br />
Willem H. Ferguson from the University of Pretoria published a paper in the<br />
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society that was entitled On the use of genetic<br />
divergence for i<strong>de</strong>ntifying species (Ferguson, 2002). The abstract of this article<br />
begins with the following three sentences:<br />
Degree of genetic divergence is frequently used to infer that two populations<br />
belong to separate species, or that several populations belong to a single<br />
species. I explore the logical framework of this approach, including the<br />
following assumptions: (i) speciation takes place over very long periods of