Principios de Taxonomia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.12 Species Pluralism: How Many Species Concepts Exist?j35<br />
the formation of the species (<strong>de</strong> Queiroz, 1999 5323). The concept does not<br />
conceive of groups of organisms as natural entities (Hull, 1997).<br />
(2) Secondly, there is an infinite number of characteristics that can be labeled as<br />
different traits between two organisms (Chapter 4). In the phenetic concept,<br />
there are no criteria regarding which traits are biologically relevant and which<br />
are not (Dupre, 1999). A major objection to the concept is that traits are so<br />
heterogeneous that any consi<strong>de</strong>ration of quantifying <strong>de</strong>grees of resemblance<br />
is impossible (Ghiselin, 1997). How similar must two organisms be so that<br />
they are similar enough to belong to the same species (Hull, 1999)? No<br />
pheneticist can answer this question. Accordingly, many authors think that<br />
phenetics is not a science (Mahner and Bunge, 1997). Mayr consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />
phenetics to be, at best, a starting point for further taxonomic analyses (Mayr<br />
and Ashlock, 1991).<br />
The species concept of phenetics is not very different from the species<br />
concept that un<strong>de</strong>rlies the barcoding approach (Chapter 4). Both concepts<br />
ignore biological processes and only look for differences. However, barcoding<br />
is based on DNA sequence differences, whereas phenetics mainly consi<strong>de</strong>rs<br />
phenotypic differences. This is an important difference because it protects<br />
barcoding taxonomy from being confoun<strong>de</strong>d by convergent (parallel-evolved)<br />
trait similarities. However, beyond this one point, barcoding taxonomy is a<br />
type of phenetics.<br />
The phenetic species concept is the only species concept that can be equally<br />
applied to all phyla of living organisms and thus offers the broa<strong>de</strong>st applicability<br />
(Dupre, 1999; Hull, 1999). It is a very simple concept that can easily be<br />
applied in practice because it avoids conflicts with controversial opinions<br />
regarding <strong>de</strong>scent or gene flow relationships. Perhaps a mo<strong>de</strong>st confinement<br />
to pure phenetics would have protected taxonomy from becoming an eternally<br />
disputed never-ending story (see below).<br />
2) The cladistic species concept: The cladistic species concept is that of <strong>de</strong>scent and<br />
therefore of evolutionary kinship (Hennig, 1966). Species are groups of organisms<br />
that have the same common ancestor. Every organism that has a common ancestor<br />
(i.e., organisms are related to each other) belongs to one species. In strong contrast<br />
to the phenetic species concept, organisms are not grouped according to trait<br />
similarities but are <strong>de</strong>fined according to their genealogical relationships to each<br />
other (Peters, 1998). The cladistic species concept does not recognize a change in<br />
traits along an evolutionary line. Alterations in traits (anagenesis, see Chapter 7) do<br />
not give rise to new species (Figure 2.3). If a group of organisms does not bifurcate,<br />
it cannot become a new species because <strong>de</strong>termining a change in traits is liable to<br />
subjective standards of perception and evaluation. In contrast, bifurcation is<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>red an objective fact (cladogenesis, see Chapter 7).<br />
The unresolved problem of the cladistic species concept is that all organisms on<br />
Earth are of common <strong>de</strong>scent. Where does one species end and another begin?<br />
All Felidae (the cat family) possess a common ancestor, just as all Lions (Panthera<br />
leo) ranging from South Africa to India have a common ancestor. Why is the Lion a