Principios de Taxonomia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.10 The DNA Barcoding Approach – is Taxonomy Nothing more than Phylogenetic Distance?j89<br />
(Stiassny and Meyer, 1999; Verheyen et al., 2003) (Chapter 6). Over presumably less<br />
than ten thousand years, there has been an adaptive radiation of enormous extent.<br />
Lake Victoria was completely dried out approximately ten thousand years ago. By<br />
some mechanism, a few Cichlids entered the lake afterwards. In the short time until<br />
the present, 400–800 species originated from this very small foun<strong>de</strong>r population.<br />
These species drastically differ from each other with regard to their traits, which<br />
are responsible for ecological adaptation and partner recognition. They have varying<br />
body sizes and color patterns, varying fin forms and also wi<strong>de</strong>ly varying mouth and<br />
jaw shapes, which reflects an adaptation to varying types of food consumption and<br />
mutual partner recognition. The Cichlid species of Lake Victoria and other African<br />
lakes differ genetically even less than humans of different populations (Schliewen<br />
et al., 2001; Verheyen et al., 2003). This example clearly documents that the<br />
phylogenetic distance between two species is not a measure of the extent of their<br />
mutual reproductive incompatibility, and it is clearly not a measure for what is<br />
thought to <strong>de</strong>fine a species in a general sense.<br />
The equation of phylogenetic distance and reproductive isolation results from a<br />
misconception of the extent of gene flow within a species (Chapter 6). The exchange<br />
of alleles among distant populations of a species could become very weak across long<br />
geographic distances. In many cases, newly arisen allelic mutants do not reach all<br />
distant populations within a species and, thus, they promote genetic divergence<br />
within a species. Alleles are not fixed anymore along the entire distribution area of a<br />
gene-flow community, but only within limited ranges of the entire distribution area.<br />
As a consequence, geographically distant populations could differ genetically,<br />
although they still belong to a connected gene-flow community (Ehrlich and Raven,<br />
1969). A scenario in which a gene-flow community attains consi<strong>de</strong>rable adaptive<br />
intraspecific genome variability is conceivable (Andolfatto, 2001), and a gene-flow<br />
community could be composed of several local races that are genetically distinct<br />
(Chapter 5).<br />
The extent of internal genetic cohesion of the individuals of a biparental species<br />
has been overestimated in the past (Mishler and Donoghue, 1994). This belief can be<br />
traced back to the advocates of the species concept of the gene-flow community,<br />
Theodosius Dobzhansky and Ernst Mayr, who were convinced that gene flow and<br />
genetic recombination would be the main forces that make the individuals of a<br />
species look so similar to one another (Dobzhansky, 1937; Mayr, 1942). However,<br />
Ehrlich and Raven (1969) countered that the extent of gene flow is very limited<br />
between geographically distant organisms of many species and suggested that the<br />
effective population size in plants is to be measured in meters and not in kilometers<br />
(Chapter 6). The individuals of populations that are separated by several kilometers<br />
may rarely, if ever, exchange genes and, as such, could evolve in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly. Their<br />
phenotypic similarity could be conserved mainly by selection pressure, not so much<br />
by genetic recombination, as Dobzhansky and Mayr assumed (Bradshaw, 1972).<br />
Lan<strong>de</strong> (1980) has stressed that there has been an overemphasis on the genetic<br />
cohesion of wi<strong>de</strong>spread species and argued that of the major forces conserving<br />
phenotypic uniformity in time and space, stabilizing selection is by far the most<br />
powerful.