20.03.2013 Views

Principios de Taxonomia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.10 The DNA Barcoding Approach – is Taxonomy Nothing more than Phylogenetic Distance?j89<br />

(Stiassny and Meyer, 1999; Verheyen et al., 2003) (Chapter 6). Over presumably less<br />

than ten thousand years, there has been an adaptive radiation of enormous extent.<br />

Lake Victoria was completely dried out approximately ten thousand years ago. By<br />

some mechanism, a few Cichlids entered the lake afterwards. In the short time until<br />

the present, 400–800 species originated from this very small foun<strong>de</strong>r population.<br />

These species drastically differ from each other with regard to their traits, which<br />

are responsible for ecological adaptation and partner recognition. They have varying<br />

body sizes and color patterns, varying fin forms and also wi<strong>de</strong>ly varying mouth and<br />

jaw shapes, which reflects an adaptation to varying types of food consumption and<br />

mutual partner recognition. The Cichlid species of Lake Victoria and other African<br />

lakes differ genetically even less than humans of different populations (Schliewen<br />

et al., 2001; Verheyen et al., 2003). This example clearly documents that the<br />

phylogenetic distance between two species is not a measure of the extent of their<br />

mutual reproductive incompatibility, and it is clearly not a measure for what is<br />

thought to <strong>de</strong>fine a species in a general sense.<br />

The equation of phylogenetic distance and reproductive isolation results from a<br />

misconception of the extent of gene flow within a species (Chapter 6). The exchange<br />

of alleles among distant populations of a species could become very weak across long<br />

geographic distances. In many cases, newly arisen allelic mutants do not reach all<br />

distant populations within a species and, thus, they promote genetic divergence<br />

within a species. Alleles are not fixed anymore along the entire distribution area of a<br />

gene-flow community, but only within limited ranges of the entire distribution area.<br />

As a consequence, geographically distant populations could differ genetically,<br />

although they still belong to a connected gene-flow community (Ehrlich and Raven,<br />

1969). A scenario in which a gene-flow community attains consi<strong>de</strong>rable adaptive<br />

intraspecific genome variability is conceivable (Andolfatto, 2001), and a gene-flow<br />

community could be composed of several local races that are genetically distinct<br />

(Chapter 5).<br />

The extent of internal genetic cohesion of the individuals of a biparental species<br />

has been overestimated in the past (Mishler and Donoghue, 1994). This belief can be<br />

traced back to the advocates of the species concept of the gene-flow community,<br />

Theodosius Dobzhansky and Ernst Mayr, who were convinced that gene flow and<br />

genetic recombination would be the main forces that make the individuals of a<br />

species look so similar to one another (Dobzhansky, 1937; Mayr, 1942). However,<br />

Ehrlich and Raven (1969) countered that the extent of gene flow is very limited<br />

between geographically distant organisms of many species and suggested that the<br />

effective population size in plants is to be measured in meters and not in kilometers<br />

(Chapter 6). The individuals of populations that are separated by several kilometers<br />

may rarely, if ever, exchange genes and, as such, could evolve in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ntly. Their<br />

phenotypic similarity could be conserved mainly by selection pressure, not so much<br />

by genetic recombination, as Dobzhansky and Mayr assumed (Bradshaw, 1972).<br />

Lan<strong>de</strong> (1980) has stressed that there has been an overemphasis on the genetic<br />

cohesion of wi<strong>de</strong>spread species and argued that of the major forces conserving<br />

phenotypic uniformity in time and space, stabilizing selection is by far the most<br />

powerful.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!