Principios de Taxonomia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
172j 6 Biological Species as a Gene-Flow Community<br />
produced, which then also successfully inherit the prezygotic speciation genes of the<br />
parents. Then, if the offspring of a purebred mating have advantages, then selection<br />
also benefits those parental properties that guarantee a correct partner choice.<br />
The un<strong>de</strong>rlying selective pressure ensures that those traits, then, quickly prevail in<br />
most cases.<br />
Reinforcement has been verified for many examples, as follows:<br />
When, in the 1920s, the Lesser Black-backed Gull (Larus fuscus) penetrated from<br />
its native breeding area in the Baltic Sea into the geographical range of the<br />
Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) in the southern North-Sea region in Germany<br />
and Holland, both species at first mated relatively often. Hybrids of both sexes are<br />
fertile. Today, after only a few <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, the two species have almost completely<br />
stopped interbreeding with each other (Haffer, 1982). Stuffed hybrids can still be<br />
found in Dutch museums and are today consi<strong>de</strong>red a valuable rarity. Apparently,<br />
the hybrids had postzygotic disadvantages, although these are not known.<br />
Accordingly, because in the first contact a prezygotic isolation came into being<br />
(or strengthened), in the course of only a few generations and as a result of natural<br />
selection, there is a bias against hybrids.<br />
A second known example is of Drosophila: At Mount Carmel in Israel, there is a<br />
gorge that ironically is called Evolution Canyon (Korol et al., 2000). The northern<br />
and the southern slope of this canyon are only a few hundred meters apart from<br />
each other, but they differ drastically from each other microclimatically because of<br />
having a different solar radiation and humidity. On both canyon slopes, certain<br />
populations of Drosophila melanogaster have adapted to the strongly different<br />
microclimates, for example, with regard to the ground temperature that triggers<br />
egg <strong>de</strong>position. Immediately after the evolution of these adaptations, a sexual<br />
blending of the populations of the opposing mountain slopes would be fatal for the<br />
preservation of the linkage of the newly evolved traits. The linkage of the new<br />
alleles would have been <strong>de</strong>stroyed by genetic recombination. Thus, a strong<br />
selective pressure has ensured a quick coevolution of an assortative mating<br />
behavior. A strong assortative partner choice with a preference for only the flies<br />
of the same mountain slope evolved, while the organisms of the opposing slope<br />
were avoi<strong>de</strong>d. In doing so, the newly evolved gene pools were kept apart. This<br />
scenario implies the <strong>de</strong> novo origin of two species of Drosophila un<strong>de</strong>r sympatric<br />
conditions because the distance of only a few hundred meters between the two<br />
mountain slopes allowed for a daily encounter of different flies. During the<br />
process of species formation, there were no external, allopatric barriers.<br />
Between the two extremes, there is no reinforcement, but there is apparently<br />
unrestricted blending (in the example of the Ruddy Ducks) and there is strong<br />
reinforcement with fast <strong>de</strong>velopment of mating barriers in the example of the<br />
European North-Sea Gulls; there are stable intermediate solutions. There are species<br />
that hybridize frequently with each other. However, <strong>de</strong>spite frequent hybridizations,<br />
the species do not lose their i<strong>de</strong>ntity. This outcome results from the fact that the<br />
percentage of species hybrids does not increase in time in the long run. If this<br />
condition is satisfied, then the occurrence of frequent hybridization apparently does