20.03.2013 Views

Principios de Taxonomia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

perform functions there. All of these genes, however, are distinguished by the fact<br />

that they have diverged extremely quickly in evolution (Orr, 2009). In Drosophila, a<br />

gene of the nuclear pore complex has been i<strong>de</strong>ntified as the cause of hybrid sterility.<br />

The nuclear pore complex is a structure in the membrane of the cell nucleus and<br />

serves as a checkpoint in the process of the channeling in and out of macromolecules.<br />

The nuclear pore complex is composed of many proteins that coevolve at high speed.<br />

Thus, there is fast incompatibility if the parents stem from different gene pools<br />

(Tautz, 2009).<br />

6.17<br />

Sympatric and Allopatric Speciation<br />

6.17 Sympatric and Allopatric Speciationj155<br />

There are two different basic possibilities for why two organisms are not able to<br />

successfully crossbreed with each other. Either they live together and there exists a<br />

prezygotic barrier between them (see above) that prevents a successful zygote<br />

formation, or they live at different locations and, thus, cannot meet at all. The first<br />

scenario is called a sympatric distribution and the second scenario is called an<br />

allopatric distribution of the populations.<br />

Differences between the two forms of separation are enormous and cannot be<br />

overvalued. The origin of two new species un<strong>de</strong>r sympatric conditions is different<br />

from the origin of two new species un<strong>de</strong>r allopatric conditions, although both<br />

processes are <strong>de</strong>signated with the same term: speciation.<br />

If two organisms live sympatrically and, therefore, meet each other regularly, they<br />

must evolve intrinsic properties that prevent mating. Completely different is the<br />

situation with two organisms that live allopatrically. Those organisms cannot meet<br />

each other for external reasons. Therefore, any prezygotic crossing barriers do not, in<br />

fact, have to exist. Allopatrically distributed organisms do not need traits that prevent<br />

zygote formation, which would not make sense biologically. Their mutual mating is<br />

prevented only by external limits, and these limits are not properties that the<br />

organisms possess themselves. Such external barriers are often, but not always, of<br />

a geographical nature. They can be oceans, mountain ranges, rivers or only highways<br />

that prevent an encounter of the separately living organisms.<br />

In the case of certain Weevil beetles or nemato<strong>de</strong> worms, however, allopatric<br />

conditions can also be produced by a lifelong confinement in the interior of a host<br />

plant that prevents a mutual encounter with each other, even in the same geographic<br />

position (McCoy, 2003). These animals spend their entire life cycles on or even in the<br />

interior of a single food plant without ever leaving the host plant. These examples<br />

have an external cause for separation that has nothing to do with a geographic<br />

separation. This form of separation is also an allopatry, although not through a<br />

geographical barrier. In every case of allopatry, however, the absence of crossbreeding<br />

is not based on the properties of the organisms themselves but, instead, is based on<br />

external barriers. Thus, the organisms themselves then carry no properties of<br />

separation at all within them. Their separation is not based on speciation genes.<br />

Those genes can, at best, evolve by pure chance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!