Principios de Taxonomia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.10 Stable Polymorphisms – The Selective Advantage is Diversityj107<br />
level of individual organisms. Most contemporary evolutionary biologists are highly<br />
skeptical of the hypothesis of group selection, which they regard as biologically<br />
implausible (Okasha, 2001).<br />
How can an allele survive the long term in a population if it is not advantageous, or<br />
even disadvantageous? Such an allele would certainly be selected against relatively<br />
quickly and thus disappear in the long term. As far as allelic polymorphisms are<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rstood today, many are not immediately advantageous for the individual.<br />
Instead, the advantage for survival lies in the population itself surviving in the case<br />
of an environmental change. In the case of such an environmental change, the<br />
survival of a population can <strong>de</strong>pend on the few surviving individuals that carry alleles<br />
that were previously disadvantageous (see the example of Darwin s Finches below).<br />
However, how do organisms (and their alleles) that are disadvantaged survive in an<br />
unchanging environment?<br />
This difficulty is not simple to resolve. Which genetic mechanisms allow for the<br />
survival of occasionally disadvantageous alleles? One mechanism is immediately<br />
obvious: recessivity. Many alleles, even disadvantageous ones, can survive for a long<br />
period of time if they are expressed in the heterozygous state. This allelic survival is<br />
possible because the homologous dominant allele <strong>de</strong>termines the phenotype and is<br />
therefore the only allele that is exposed to selection. Such recessive alleles are un<strong>de</strong>r a<br />
invisibility cloak. Certain authors even believe that the biological meaning of<br />
diploidy is foun<strong>de</strong>d in this concept.<br />
A second genetic mechanism that may preserve disadvantageous alleles over the<br />
long term is the fixed coupling of these alleles with neighboring genes. These groups<br />
of genes would be linked on the chromosome and only rarely, if ever, separated by<br />
recombination. If the neighboring genes have a selective advantage, they could carry<br />
disadvantageous coupled genes with them from one generation to the next, provi<strong>de</strong>d<br />
that the disadvantage of the linked allele is not too great.<br />
The following simple example further illustrates this concept. Sexual dimorphism<br />
can be thought of as a stable polymorphism. There are several examples of a particular<br />
sex exhibiting selective disadvantages. For example, there is a clear selective disadvantage<br />
for the female sex in some human cultures. Despite this, females are not<br />
displaced through selection because the selective advantage of sexual dimorphism is<br />
not the advantage of being a male or a female. Rather, the advantage comes from there<br />
being two sexes in the population. The sex that is disadvantaged by inherited<br />
properties or unfavorable ethical or social constraints does not have a selective<br />
disadvantage; its survival is due to the advantage of the two sexes coexisting, as<br />
disadvantageous as it may be to be of a given sex.<br />
Stable polymorphisms are not restricted to sexual dimorphism. These polymorphisms<br />
occur in various forms and are the primary foundation of intraspecific trait<br />
variabilities (Aguilar et al., 2004). Known examples of stable polymorphisms inclu<strong>de</strong><br />
the major histocompatibility gene complex (MHC) and the different blood groups. In<br />
the case of the MHC, allelic diversity is evolutionarily ol<strong>de</strong>r than the separation of<br />
humans and chimpanzees. With respect to particular MHC alleles, humans and<br />
chimpanzees are more similar than particular humans are among themselves<br />
(Figueroa, G€unther, and Klein, 1988). Careful thought should be given to the fact