Principios de Taxonomia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
190j 7 The Cohesion of Organisms Through Genealogical Lineage (Cladistics)<br />
Figure 7.3 Reproduction of biparental organisms cannot be displayed in a simple cladistic tree<br />
because the fusion of gametes (fertilization) reverses bifurcations into a network. The branches do<br />
not bifurcate in an upward direction along the time scale but, rather, fuse upwards.<br />
Because the phylogenetic tree displays only reduplication and bifurcation, in the<br />
first instance, only uniparental reproduction processes can be displayed in a<br />
phylogenetic tree. Uniparental reproduction is the reproduction of a single individual<br />
without the sexual merging of two parents. It is vegetative reproduction, parthenogenesis<br />
or self-fertilization (Chapter 6). Only this kind of simple cleavage of a mother<br />
organism into two daughter organisms represents the branching phylogenetic tree as<br />
it is displayed in Figure 7.2. Biparental sexuality is not a kind of replication and<br />
branching, and thus the reproduction of biparental organisms cannot be displayed in<br />
a simple phylogenetic tree (Figure 7.3).<br />
Many single-celled protists, for example, amoebae or flagellates, reproduce uniparentally.<br />
Also, the vegetative reproductive stages of sponges and Coelenterata, that is,<br />
multicellular organisms, as well as the parthenogenetic life cycles of rotifers and water<br />
fleas are also uniparental. These replication processes can easily be displayed in a<br />
bifurcating phylogenetic tree. Bisexual processes, however, cannot be displayed in a<br />
simple phylogenetic tree because sexual reproduction is the opposite of bifurcation.<br />
Biparental sexuality is the lateral fusion of separated branches. The phylogenetic tree<br />
does not apply to sexually reproducing organisms. The fusion of separated branches<br />
turnsthephylogenetictreeintoareticularnetwork,whichisnotaphylogenetictree,for<br />
aphylogenetictreeisexpectedtobeatreewithdivergingbranchesthatonlydivergebut<br />
do not reconvene. The diagram in Figure 7.2 cannot be used for the representation of a<br />
family s phylogenetic tree. A family s tree (Figure 7.3) inclu<strong>de</strong>s biparental sexuality,<br />
and therefore it cannot be a phylogenetic tree, but rather, it is a reticular network.<br />
Every fusion of gametes (fertilization) reverses the basic element of a phylogenetic<br />
tree: bifurcation. The bifurcating phylogenetic tree is tarnished by sexual processes.<br />
Biparental sexuality means that the offspring of an individual becomes<br />
contaminated by its sexual partner. The children of a spouse are only one half<br />
its offspring, its grandchildren only one quarter. As shown in Figure 7.3, biparental<br />
reproduction reverses the bifurcating phylogenetic tree. The branches do not<br />
bifurcate in an upward direction, but to the contrary, they fuse upward along the<br />
time scale.<br />
However, there certainly are phylogenetic trees of biparental organisms. How is<br />
this possible? This apparent incongruity results from a confusion of the hierarchical