20.03.2013 Views

Principios de Taxonomia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

190j 7 The Cohesion of Organisms Through Genealogical Lineage (Cladistics)<br />

Figure 7.3 Reproduction of biparental organisms cannot be displayed in a simple cladistic tree<br />

because the fusion of gametes (fertilization) reverses bifurcations into a network. The branches do<br />

not bifurcate in an upward direction along the time scale but, rather, fuse upwards.<br />

Because the phylogenetic tree displays only reduplication and bifurcation, in the<br />

first instance, only uniparental reproduction processes can be displayed in a<br />

phylogenetic tree. Uniparental reproduction is the reproduction of a single individual<br />

without the sexual merging of two parents. It is vegetative reproduction, parthenogenesis<br />

or self-fertilization (Chapter 6). Only this kind of simple cleavage of a mother<br />

organism into two daughter organisms represents the branching phylogenetic tree as<br />

it is displayed in Figure 7.2. Biparental sexuality is not a kind of replication and<br />

branching, and thus the reproduction of biparental organisms cannot be displayed in<br />

a simple phylogenetic tree (Figure 7.3).<br />

Many single-celled protists, for example, amoebae or flagellates, reproduce uniparentally.<br />

Also, the vegetative reproductive stages of sponges and Coelenterata, that is,<br />

multicellular organisms, as well as the parthenogenetic life cycles of rotifers and water<br />

fleas are also uniparental. These replication processes can easily be displayed in a<br />

bifurcating phylogenetic tree. Bisexual processes, however, cannot be displayed in a<br />

simple phylogenetic tree because sexual reproduction is the opposite of bifurcation.<br />

Biparental sexuality is the lateral fusion of separated branches. The phylogenetic tree<br />

does not apply to sexually reproducing organisms. The fusion of separated branches<br />

turnsthephylogenetictreeintoareticularnetwork,whichisnotaphylogenetictree,for<br />

aphylogenetictreeisexpectedtobeatreewithdivergingbranchesthatonlydivergebut<br />

do not reconvene. The diagram in Figure 7.2 cannot be used for the representation of a<br />

family s phylogenetic tree. A family s tree (Figure 7.3) inclu<strong>de</strong>s biparental sexuality,<br />

and therefore it cannot be a phylogenetic tree, but rather, it is a reticular network.<br />

Every fusion of gametes (fertilization) reverses the basic element of a phylogenetic<br />

tree: bifurcation. The bifurcating phylogenetic tree is tarnished by sexual processes.<br />

Biparental sexuality means that the offspring of an individual becomes<br />

contaminated by its sexual partner. The children of a spouse are only one half<br />

its offspring, its grandchildren only one quarter. As shown in Figure 7.3, biparental<br />

reproduction reverses the bifurcating phylogenetic tree. The branches do not<br />

bifurcate in an upward direction, but to the contrary, they fuse upward along the<br />

time scale.<br />

However, there certainly are phylogenetic trees of biparental organisms. How is<br />

this possible? This apparent incongruity results from a confusion of the hierarchical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!