20.03.2013 Views

Principios de Taxonomia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134j 6 Biological Species as a Gene-Flow Community<br />

Therefore, <strong>de</strong>scent communities cannot be natural groups because they form a<br />

continuum, not a structured set of groups. Genealogical connection implies the birth<br />

of children or grandchildren, not the birth of taxa. Nothing in the succession of<br />

consecutive generations constitutes the end of one taxon and the beginning<br />

of another taxon (Simpson, 1961). The <strong>de</strong>scent connection exists in nature, but<br />

there are no <strong>de</strong>fined boundaries. The boundaries in the <strong>de</strong>scent community must be<br />

created by human-imposed criteria. In contrast, gene-flow connections have natural<br />

boundaries and are therefore acceptable for use in forming a natural species concept.<br />

6.5<br />

The Concept of the Gene-Flow Community in Eukaryotes and in Bacteria<br />

Lateral gene transfer is not restricted to eukaryotic sperm-egg fusion. Lateral gene flow<br />

also exists in prokaryotes (bacteria). The peculiarity of bacteria, however, is that the<br />

horizontal gene transfer does not only occur between related organisms, but bridges<br />

wi<strong>de</strong> evolutionary divi<strong>de</strong>s. Bacteria that are evolutionary distant from each other can<br />

exchange genes (Dagan, rtzy-Randrup, and Martin, 2008). There is even occasional<br />

transfer between archaebacteria and eubacteria, which are assigned to different<br />

kingdoms because of their evolutionary distance (Woese, Kandler, and Wheelis, 1990).<br />

Recently, an essay was published with the noteworthy title, Species do not really<br />

mean anything in the bacterial world (Hollrichter, 2007). This title signifies that<br />

there are no reliably covarying traits in bacteria that would allow a consistent scheme<br />

of classification. Bacteria can be classified according to one property, but another<br />

property may overlap across the units; classification by this property would result in<br />

other <strong>de</strong>limitations. By classifying according to one trait, one may, of course, obtain<br />

groups. However, by then classifying according to a second trait, one may obtain<br />

completely different groups.<br />

After bacteria were classified by morphological criteria 150 years ago, the age of<br />

bacterial cultures began. Accordingly, bacteria were arranged by physiological and<br />

biochemical properties or by their specific pathogenicities. The chemotaxonomical<br />

classification was based on fatty acid and sugar components. In the<br />

1960s, however, a completely new classification was conducted according to genomic<br />

similarity. Carl Woese has given preference to the comparison of 16S rRNA gene<br />

sequences for creating taxonomic classifications.<br />

As of today, about 7000 species of bacteria have been <strong>de</strong>signated and classified into<br />

1194 genera, 240 families, 88 or<strong>de</strong>rs, 41 classes and 26 phyla (Hollrichter, 2007). This<br />

classification is based on the following <strong>de</strong>finition of species: two organisms belong to<br />

the same species if their genomes are more than 70% i<strong>de</strong>ntical, their 16S rRNA<br />

sequences are at least 97% i<strong>de</strong>ntical and their phenotypes are very similar. This<br />

<strong>de</strong>finition, however, cannot be applied to most bacteria, as the three criteria are not<br />

consistent. Due to lateral gene transfer, there are bacteria whose genomes are more<br />

than 70% i<strong>de</strong>ntical, which thus should belong to the same species, but which<br />

also exhibit large differences in their 16S rRNA sequences, and so should belong<br />

to different species. The reverse is also seen.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!