22.03.2013 Views

et al.

et al.

et al.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PERSPECTIVES<br />

772<br />

Pyroclastic flows<br />

∆ 17 O = +0.6‰<br />

hν<br />

*O=C=O *O + C=O<br />

*O + O *O 2 3<br />

*O + H O hν H *O + O 3 2 2 2 2<br />

H 2 *O 2<br />

mass-independent isotope fractionations<br />

driven by the pen<strong>et</strong>ration of ultraviol<strong>et</strong> light<br />

through the thin atmosphere of Mars ( 7, 8).<br />

Further, on Earth such processes would be<br />

wiped out by plate tectonics, but the absence<br />

of subduction on Mars resulted in the preservation<br />

of mass-independent isotope anom<strong>al</strong>ies<br />

( 7, 8). Ever since the Viking mission in<br />

1976, it has been known that Mars’ atmosphere<br />

is escaping the plan<strong>et</strong>’s gravitation<strong>al</strong><br />

grasp with attendant mass fractionation,<br />

but that carbon and oxygen isotopes did not<br />

exhibit the extreme mass-dependent fractionation<br />

observed in nitrogen. Therefore,<br />

a reservoir on Mars must be buffering the<br />

C and O isotopes ( 9). Agee <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. now show<br />

that the lithosphere may be part of the buffering<br />

(at least for oxygen) because the bulk<br />

oxygen isotope composition of NWA 7034<br />

has been shifted toward the atmospheric end<br />

relative to other martian m<strong>et</strong>eorites (see the<br />

fi gure). Incident<strong>al</strong>ly, this is one of the questions<br />

Curiosity is designed to tackle on<br />

Mars, but Agee <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. may have beaten the<br />

rover to the punch line.<br />

Upper atmosphere<br />

∆ 17 O ≥ +0.8‰<br />

MgSiO 3 + *O 3 MgSi*O 3 + O 3<br />

Lava flows<br />

∆ 17 O = +0.3‰<br />

Pyroclastic flows?<br />

Spirit of exploration. A cartoon of a volcanic pyroclastic fl ow schematic<strong>al</strong>ly depicting how NWA 7034 may have formed on<br />

Mars ( 4) and how photochemic<strong>al</strong> reactions may imprint isotopic signatures in the newly formed rock. (Ins<strong>et</strong>) An image of<br />

Gusev Crater viewed by Spirit (PIA02688, 19 February 2006) showing possible pyroclastic deposits.<br />

Another interesting aspect of NWA 7034<br />

is its clastic nature, whereby numerous<br />

fragments of rock and miner<strong>al</strong> are bound<br />

tog<strong>et</strong>her. It is unknown wh<strong>et</strong>her these clasts<br />

<strong>al</strong>l originate from a single (pyroclastic) volcanic<br />

eruption, or wh<strong>et</strong>her multiple clasts are<br />

introduced by impact or some other extern<strong>al</strong><br />

agent. Experience with lunar rocks reve<strong>al</strong>ed<br />

a we<strong>al</strong>th of information in 2- to 4-mm rock<br />

fragments; is this an opportunity to repeat<br />

that exercise on Mars?<br />

Agee <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. measured 0.6 weight percent<br />

water in NWA 7034 with a distinct oxygen<br />

isotope composition from the bulk rock,<br />

effectively a sample of the martian hydrosphere<br />

or permafrost trapped within the<br />

matrix of NWA 7034. What are the host<br />

miner<strong>al</strong>s? As a rock that appears to have<br />

originated at the martian surface, NWA<br />

7034 may contain the elusive hydrous miner<strong>al</strong>s<br />

that host water on Mars and their miner<strong>al</strong>ogy<br />

might now be d<strong>et</strong>ermined in the laboratory,<br />

with important inputs into directing<br />

Curiosity or designing the next generation<br />

of Mars probes.<br />

15 FEBRUARY 2013 VOL 339 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org<br />

Published by AAAS<br />

And, fi n<strong>al</strong>ly, there is macromolecular<br />

organic carbon<br />

(MMC) recognized in inclusions<br />

within feldspar cryst<strong>al</strong>s<br />

( 4). It is tempting to wonder<br />

wh<strong>et</strong>her the volcanic activity<br />

associated with the igneous<br />

clasts in NWA 7034 provided<br />

a warm haven for martian life.<br />

If so, this is the place to start<br />

a search. Because NWA 7034<br />

is a desert fi nd and not a fresh<br />

f<strong>al</strong>l (even though it appears<br />

rather fresh by Saharan m<strong>et</strong>eorite<br />

standards), an important<br />

question is wh<strong>et</strong>her the organic<br />

matter in NWA 7034 is actu<strong>al</strong>ly<br />

from Mars. This can be<br />

s<strong>et</strong>tled by measurement of the<br />

D/H (deuterium/hydrogen)<br />

ratio for the MMC because the<br />

martian hydrogen is characterized<br />

by a high D/H ratio relative<br />

to terrestri<strong>al</strong> organics ( 10).<br />

If an extraterrestri<strong>al</strong> origin is<br />

indeed confirmed, it may y<strong>et</strong><br />

prove to be m<strong>et</strong>eoritic organics<br />

associated with microm<strong>et</strong>eorite<br />

inf<strong>al</strong>l on the martian surface.<br />

Anyway, the hunt for life<br />

on Mars in another m<strong>et</strong>eorite<br />

will then be on.<br />

If one were to wish for a single<br />

martian m<strong>et</strong>eorite, it would<br />

be NWA 7034, the fi rst known<br />

arch<strong>et</strong>yp<strong>al</strong> crust<strong>al</strong> rock from<br />

Mars. When other such rocks are found, they<br />

may help to clarify many remaining questions<br />

about the martian surface. For example,<br />

has hydrotherm<strong>al</strong> activity occurred on<br />

Mars? Have ore miner<strong>al</strong>izations occurred?<br />

Is there evidence of soil (aeolian dust) in<br />

the breccia? Is trapped ancient atmosphere<br />

(nitrogen, noble gases) present in the amorphous<br />

materi<strong>al</strong>? Stay tuned for more exciting<br />

discoveries.<br />

References<br />

1. H. Y. McSween Jr., M<strong>et</strong>eorit. Plan<strong>et</strong>. Sci. 37, 7 (2002).<br />

2. A. H. Treiman, J. D. Gleason, D. D. Bogard, Plan<strong>et</strong>. Space<br />

Sci. 48, 1213 (2000).<br />

3. H. Y. McSween Jr., G. J. Taylor, M. B. Wyatt, Science 324,<br />

736 (2009).<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

4. C. B. Agee <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>., Science 339, 780 (2013);<br />

10.1126/science.1228858.<br />

5. R. N. Clayton, T. K. Mayeda, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta<br />

60, 1999 (1996).<br />

6. T. J. Lapen <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>., Science 328, 347 (2010).<br />

7. H. R. Karlsson, R. N. Clayton, E. K. Gibson Jr.,<br />

T. K. Mayeda, Science 255, 1409 (1992).<br />

8. J. Farquhar, M. H. Thiemens, T. Jackson, Science 280,<br />

1580 (1998).<br />

9. A. O. Nier, M. B. McElroy, Science 194, 1298 (1976).<br />

10. L. A. Leshin, E. Vicenzi, Elements 2, 157 (2006).<br />

NASA/JPL-CALTECH/USGS/CORNELL<br />

10.1126/science.1232490 CREDIT:<br />

on February 14, 2013<br />

www.sciencemag.org<br />

Downloaded from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!