22.03.2013 Views

et al.

et al.

et al.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

We estimated that we achieved a range of 8000- to<br />

15,000-fold purification and 2 to 5% recovery of<br />

the activity from these routes of fractionation.<br />

However, in the last step of each of these purification<br />

routes, silver staining of the fractions<br />

did not reve<strong>al</strong> clear protein bands that copurified<br />

with the cGAS activity, which suggests that the<br />

abundance of the putative cGAS protein might<br />

be very low in L929 cytosolic extracts.<br />

We developed a quantitative mass spectrom<strong>et</strong>ry<br />

strategy to identify a list of proteins that<br />

copurified with the cGAS activity at the last step<br />

of each purification route. We reasoned that the<br />

putative cGAS protein must copurify with its<br />

activity in <strong>al</strong>l three purification routes, whereas<br />

most “contaminating” proteins would not. Thus,<br />

from the last step of each purification route, we<br />

chose fractions that contained most of the cGAS<br />

activity (peak fractions) and adjacent fractions<br />

that contained very weak or no activity (fig. S1B).<br />

The proteins in each fraction were separated by<br />

SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)<br />

and identified by nano–liquid chromatography–<br />

mass spectrom<strong>et</strong>ry (nano-LC-MS). The data were<br />

an<strong>al</strong>yzed by label-free quantification using the<br />

A<br />

IFNβ RNA (fold)<br />

Plasmid:<br />

B<br />

IB: IRF3<br />

IB: Flag<br />

cGAS<br />

WT<br />

MAVS<br />

Vector<br />

m-cGAS WT<br />

m-cGAS GS>AA<br />

m-cGAS ED>AA<br />

Lane: 1 2 3 4 5<br />

HEK293T-STING<br />

cGAS<br />

WT<br />

h-cGAS WT<br />

MaxQuant software (5); the proteins that copurified<br />

with the cGAS activity are shown in<br />

table S1 and illustrated in a Venn diagram (fig.<br />

S1C). Remarkably, <strong>al</strong>though many proteins copurified<br />

with the cGAS activity in one or two<br />

purification routes, only three proteins copurified<br />

in <strong>al</strong>l three routes. All three were putative<br />

uncharacterized proteins: E330016A19 (NCBI<br />

accession number NP_775562), Arf-GAP with<br />

du<strong>al</strong> PH domain–containing protein 2 (NP_742145),<br />

and sign<strong>al</strong> recognition particle 9-kD protein<br />

(NP_036188). Among these, more than 24 unique<br />

peptides were identified in E330016A19, representing<br />

41% coverage in this protein of 507<br />

amino acids (fig. S2A).<br />

Bioinformatic an<strong>al</strong>ysis drew our attention to<br />

E330016A19, which exhibited structur<strong>al</strong> and sequence<br />

homology to the cat<strong>al</strong>ytic domain of human<br />

oligoadenylate synthase (OAS1) (Fig. 1A).<br />

In particular, E330016A19 contains a conserved<br />

Gly[Gly/Ser]x9–13[Glu/Asp]h[Glu/Asp]h motif,<br />

where x9–13 indicates 9 to 13 flanking residues<br />

consisting of any amino acid and h indicates a<br />

hydrophobic amino acid. This motif is found<br />

in the nucleotidyltransferase (NTase) family (6).<br />

cGAS<br />

GS>AA<br />

HEK293T HEK293T-STING<br />

(IRF3)2<br />

IRF3<br />

IB:Flag<br />

MAVS<br />

endogenous<br />

IRF3<br />

cGAMP<br />

activity<br />

assay<br />

Vector<br />

DAI<br />

C<br />

IFNβ RNA (fold)<br />

-<br />

Plasmid:<br />

D E<br />

IFI16<br />

DDX41<br />

cGAS<br />

MAVS<br />

Lane: 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

MW(kDa)<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

(IRF3)2<br />

IRF3<br />

(IRF3)2<br />

IRF3<br />

Besides OAS1, this family includes adenylate<br />

cyclase, polyadenylate polymerase, and DNA<br />

polymerases. The C terminus of E330016A19<br />

contained a Mab21 (m<strong>al</strong>e abnorm<strong>al</strong> 21) domain,<br />

which was first identified in the Caenorhabditis<br />

elegans protein Mab21 (7). Sequence<br />

<strong>al</strong>ignment reve<strong>al</strong>ed that the C-termin<strong>al</strong> NTase<br />

and Mab21 domains are highly conserved from<br />

zebrafish to human (fig. S2, B and C), whereas<br />

the N-termin<strong>al</strong> sequences are much less conserved<br />

(8). The human homolog of E330016A19,<br />

C6orf150 (<strong>al</strong>so known as MB21D1), was recently<br />

identified as one of sever<strong>al</strong> positive hits in a screen<br />

for interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) whose<br />

overexpression inhibited vir<strong>al</strong> replication (9). For<br />

clarity, and on the basis of evidence presented<br />

below, we propose to name the mouse protein<br />

E330016A19 as m-cGAS and the human homolog<br />

C6orf150 as h-cGAS.<br />

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase<br />

chain reaction (qRT-PCR) showed that the<br />

expression of m-cGAS was low in immort<strong>al</strong>ized<br />

mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) but high in<br />

L929 cells, Raw264.7 cells, and bone marrow–<br />

derived macrophages (Fig. 1B). Similarly, the<br />

20<br />

200<br />

2000<br />

20<br />

200<br />

2000<br />

20<br />

200<br />

2000<br />

20<br />

200<br />

2000<br />

20<br />

200<br />

2000<br />

DAI IFI16 DDX41 cGAS MAVS<br />

IB: IRF3<br />

RESEARCH ARTICLES<br />

Control h-cGAS m-cGAS<br />

DNA: - + - + - +<br />

Lane: 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

ng<br />

(IRF3)2<br />

IRF3<br />

Fig. 2. cGAS activates IRF3 and induces IFN-b.<br />

(A) Expression plasmids (100 and 500 ng) encoding<br />

Flag-tagged mouse cGAS (m-cGAS), its<br />

active-site mutants G198A and S199A (designated<br />

as GS>AA), and MAVS were transfected<br />

into HEK293T cells or the same cell line stably<br />

expressing STING (HEK293T-STING). IFN-b RNA was measured by qRT-PCR 24 hours after transfection. (B) Similar to (A), except that cell lysates were<br />

an<strong>al</strong>yzed for IRF3 dimerization by native gel electrophoresis (top). Expression levels of the transfected genes were monitored by immunoblotting with<br />

antibody to Flag (bottom). h-cGAS, human cGAS; ED>AA, E211A and D213A in mouse cGAS. (C) Expression vectors for the indicated proteins were<br />

transfected into HEK293T-STING cells, followed by measurement of IFN-b by qRT-PCR. (D) Celllysatesshownin(C)wereimmunoblottedwithantibodiesto<br />

Flag and IRF3 after SDS-PAGE and native PAGE, respectively (top two panels). Aliquots of the cell extracts were assayed for the presence of cGAMP activity,<br />

which was measured by d<strong>et</strong>ecting IRF3 dimerization after delivery into permeabilized Raw264.7 cells (bottom). (E) Human and mouse cGAS were expressed in<br />

HEK293T cells and affinity-purified with antibody to Flag. The proteins wereincubatedwithATPandGTPinthepresenceorabsenceofHT-DNA,andthe<br />

synthesis of cGAMP was assessed by its ability to induce IRF3 dimerization in Raw264.7 cells.<br />

www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 339 15 FEBRUARY 2013 787<br />

on February 14, 2013<br />

www.sciencemag.org<br />

Downloaded from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!