Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Recommendations

Info

Table19: Hypothesis 2: Independent sample test Pelvis instability with ASLR Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Std. Error Mean Differenc F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference e Lower Upper Equal variances assumed 9.482 .004 -1.930 38 .061 -35.613 18.453 -72.969 1.742 Dallasscore totaal 0- 400 Equal variances not assumed -2.200 37.955 .034 -35.613 16.189 -68.388 -2.838 Equal variances assumed 6.377 .016 -2.145 38 .038 -21.547 10.044 -41.880 -1.214 Sectie 1+2/205 Equal variances not assumed -2.458 37.857 .019 -21.547 8.764 -39.291 -3.802 Equal variances assumed 5.792 .021 -1.403 38 .169 -14.067 10.027 -34.366 6.232 Sectie 3+4/195 Equal variances not assumed -1.592 37.992 .120 -14.067 8.834 -31.950 3.816 Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 101
Table 25: Hypothesis 3: Independent sample test Independent Samples Test Levene's Test t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper .742 .394 .411 38 .683 7.722 18.774 -30.284 45.729 Equal variances assumed Dallasscore totaal 0- 400 .417 37.847 .679 7.722 18.504 -29.742 45.186 .012 .913 -.105 38 .917 -1.091 10.347 -22.038 19.856 Equal variances not assumed Equal variances assumed Sectie 1+2/205 -.104 33.482 .918 -1.091 10.524 -22.490 20.308 Equal variances not assumed 2.727 .107 .890 38 .379 8.813 9.905 -11.238 28.864 Equal variances assumed Sectie 3+4/195 .932 35.551 .358 8.813 9.458 -10.377 28.003 Equal variances not assumed Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 102
Page 1 and 2:
pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
Page 3 and 4:
Conformity declaration Author: Joha
Page 5 and 6:
5.2.2 Hypothesis 2 ................
Page 7 and 8:
Figure/Table # List of tables Descr
Page 9 and 10:
Figure/Table # List of figures Desc
Page 11 and 12:
1. Introduction This Master researc
Page 13 and 14:
2. Basics This study aims to assess
Page 15 and 16:
As third reasons there are the ridg
Page 17 and 18:
The anterior oblique sling: The ant
Page 19 and 20:
This description of the symptoms co
Page 21 and 22:
Table 2: Table by Bastiaanssen made
Page 23 and 24:
which the period of measurement aft
Page 25 and 26:
2.3.2 Clinical tests These are divi
Page 27 and 28:
For women with pregnancy-related po
Page 29 and 30:
muscle strength. The highest score
Page 31 and 32:
various aspects of the psychologica
Page 33 and 34:
3. Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 H0: The
Page 35 and 36:
4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Type o
Page 37 and 38:
These physical tests were first per
Page 39 and 40:
: With these data, I calculated how
Page 41 and 42:
No further differentiation was made
Page 43 and 44:
Initial posture therapist two: this
Page 45 and 46:
The columns contain the following i
Page 47 and 48:
5. Results 5.1 Population character
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2: Characteristics of the gr
Page 51 and 52: Following test combinations are com
Page 53 and 54: Table 15: Hypothesis 1: Characteris
Page 55 and 56: There are no significant difference
Page 57 and 58: Figure 6: Hypothesis 2: Different s
Page 59 and 60: Figure 8: Hypothesis 3: Characteris
Page 61 and 62: Figure 9: Hypothesis 3: Score on th
Page 63 and 64: Table 28: Hypothesis 4: Differences
Page 65 and 66: Figure 11: Hypothesis 4: Score on t
Page 67 and 68: Table 33: Hypothesis 5: Total score
Page 69 and 70: Characteristics on negative physica
Page 71 and 72: Characteristics and differences: Th
Page 73 and 74: We have also seen that for 35% of t
Page 75 and 76: 6.2.1 Population The recruitment of
Page 77 and 78: score of 2-3. From the perspective
Page 79 and 80: A reason that these women do not sc
Page 81 and 82: pain above the lumbar region. Howev
Page 83 and 84: tests exist out of the ASLR + the o
Page 85 and 86: As already mentioned, in the group
Page 87 and 88: 6.3.6 Hypothesis 6 H0: There is no
Page 89 and 90: o Also significant differences were
Page 91 and 92: Gutke, A., Josefsson, A. & Oberg, B
Page 93 and 94: Vleeming, A, 2007. The role of the
Page 95 and 96: 10 Appendix 10.1 Tables In this sec
Page 97 and 98: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 99 and 100: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 101: Table 12: Independent sample test f
Page 105 and 106: 10.2 Informed Consent Permission-ba
Page 107 and 108: Strookje (leaflet) Ik wil meewerken
Page 109 and 110: 10.5 Dallas Pain Questionaire Naam_
Page 111 and 112: Niet veranderd Drastisch veranderd
Page 113: pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
show all

Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?