Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Recommendations

Info

Mens, Jan M A & Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies, 2009. Mobility of the Pelvic Joints in Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain. Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 64(3), pp.200–208. Mogren, I., 2005. Low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy: prevalence and risk factors. Spine, 30(8), pp.983–991. Available at: http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Abstract/2005/04150/Low_Back_Pain_and_ Pelvic_Pain_During_Pregnancy_.22.aspx [Accessed June 3, 2012]. O’Sullivan, P. et al., 2002. Altered motor control strategies in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight-leg-raise test. Spine, 27(1), pp.1–8. Available at: http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Abstract/2002/01010/Altered_Motor_Contro l_Strategies_in_Subjects_With.15.aspx [Accessed June 1, 2012]. Pool-Goudzwaard, A.L. et al., 1998. insufficient lumbopelvic stability-a clinical, anatomical....pdf. Man, 3(1), pp.12–20. Pool-Goudzwaard, Annelies et al., 2004. Contribution of pelvic floor muscles to stiffness of the pelvic ring. Clinical Biomechanics, 19(6), pp.564–571. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15234479. Robinson, H.S. et al., 2006. Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: The impact on function. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 85(2), pp.160–164. Available at: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00016340500410024 [Accessed May 8, 2012]. Robinson, H.S. et al., 2010. Pelvic girdle pain, clinical tests and disability in late pregnancy. Manual therapy, 15(3), pp.280–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20117040 [Accessed March 12, 2012]. Röst, C., 2011. Bekkenpijn tijdens en na de zwangerschap, Amsterdam: Reed business. Stapleton, D.B., MacLennan, A.H. & Kristiansson, P., 2002. The prevalence of recalled low back pain during and after pregnancy: a South Australian population survey. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42(5), pp.482–485. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00482.x. Stuber, K.J., 2007. Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint: a systematic review of the literature. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 51(1), pp.30–41. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1924656&tool=pmcen trez&rendertype=abstract. Stuge, B., Sætre, K. & Brækken, I.H., 2012. The association between pelvic floor muscle function and pelvic girdle pain - A matched case control 3D ultrasound study. Manual therapy, 17(2), pp.150–6. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22245422 [Accessed March 10, 2012]. Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 91
Vleeming, A, 2007. The role of the pelvic girdle in coupling the spine and the legs: a clinical-anatomical perspective on pelvic stability. In Movement, Stability and lumbopelvic pain: integration of research and therapy. pp. 113–137. Available at: http://www.activix.co.il/WEB/8888/NSF/Web/5426/Vleeming sample chapter 8.pdf [Accessed May 30, 2012]. Vleeming, Andry et al., 2008. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 17(6), pp.794–819. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2518998&tool=pmcen trez&rendertype=abstract [Accessed July 30, 2011]. Worku, Z., 2000. Prevalence of low-back pain in Lesotho mothers. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological, 23(3), pp.147–154. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475400902434 [Accessed June 3, 2012]. van der Wurff, P., Hagmeijer, R.H. & Meyne, W., 2000. Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability. Manual therapy, 5(1), pp.30–6. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10688957 [Accessed March 12, 2012]. Website http://www.sonjabakker.nl/bmi/bmi Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 92
Page 1 and 2:
pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
Page 3 and 4:
Conformity declaration Author: Joha
Page 5 and 6:
5.2.2 Hypothesis 2 ................
Page 7 and 8:
Figure/Table # List of tables Descr
Page 9 and 10:
Figure/Table # List of figures Desc
Page 11 and 12:
1. Introduction This Master researc
Page 13 and 14:
2. Basics This study aims to assess
Page 15 and 16:
As third reasons there are the ridg
Page 17 and 18:
The anterior oblique sling: The ant
Page 19 and 20:
This description of the symptoms co
Page 21 and 22:
Table 2: Table by Bastiaanssen made
Page 23 and 24:
which the period of measurement aft
Page 25 and 26:
2.3.2 Clinical tests These are divi
Page 27 and 28:
For women with pregnancy-related po
Page 29 and 30:
muscle strength. The highest score
Page 31 and 32:
various aspects of the psychologica
Page 33 and 34:
3. Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 H0: The
Page 35 and 36:
4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Type o
Page 37 and 38:
These physical tests were first per
Page 39 and 40:
: With these data, I calculated how
Page 41 and 42: No further differentiation was made
Page 43 and 44: Initial posture therapist two: this
Page 45 and 46: The columns contain the following i
Page 47 and 48: 5. Results 5.1 Population character
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2: Characteristics of the gr
Page 51 and 52: Following test combinations are com
Page 53 and 54: Table 15: Hypothesis 1: Characteris
Page 55 and 56: There are no significant difference
Page 57 and 58: Figure 6: Hypothesis 2: Different s
Page 59 and 60: Figure 8: Hypothesis 3: Characteris
Page 61 and 62: Figure 9: Hypothesis 3: Score on th
Page 63 and 64: Table 28: Hypothesis 4: Differences
Page 65 and 66: Figure 11: Hypothesis 4: Score on t
Page 67 and 68: Table 33: Hypothesis 5: Total score
Page 69 and 70: Characteristics on negative physica
Page 71 and 72: Characteristics and differences: Th
Page 73 and 74: We have also seen that for 35% of t
Page 75 and 76: 6.2.1 Population The recruitment of
Page 77 and 78: score of 2-3. From the perspective
Page 79 and 80: A reason that these women do not sc
Page 81 and 82: pain above the lumbar region. Howev
Page 83 and 84: tests exist out of the ASLR + the o
Page 85 and 86: As already mentioned, in the group
Page 87 and 88: 6.3.6 Hypothesis 6 H0: There is no
Page 89 and 90: o Also significant differences were
Page 91: Gutke, A., Josefsson, A. & Oberg, B
Page 95 and 96: 10 Appendix 10.1 Tables In this sec
Page 97 and 98: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 99 and 100: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 101 and 102: Table 12: Independent sample test f
Page 103 and 104: Table 25: Hypothesis 3: Independent
Page 105 and 106: 10.2 Informed Consent Permission-ba
Page 107 and 108: Strookje (leaflet) Ik wil meewerken
Page 109 and 110: 10.5 Dallas Pain Questionaire Naam_
Page 111 and 112: Niet veranderd Drastisch veranderd
Page 113: pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
show all

Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?