Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Recommendations

Info

Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP/PGP moment of measurement Period of pain measurement Diagnositc method(s) Description of pain complaints Population size Design Study population First author (reference) country 76% LBP during pregnancy, 21,1% persistent pain at 24 months after delivery Early postnatal period (within 3 days after delivery) and 24 months after delivery During pregnancy until 24 months after delivery Questionairres : Pain distribution chart; visual analog scale Back pain : positive pain symptoms at any stage in pregnancy 326 Low-risk obstetric patients were recruited from the antenatal ward To, China PC 68,5% LBP during pregnancy At one moment (different between respondents) during pregnancy During pregnancy Questionairres: selfreported LBP 950 ND Pregnant women attending various antenatal clinics in New Haven Country, Connecticut and various prenatal educational programs CS Wang, USA (Connecticut) 20,1% PGS: 6,0%, Symphysiolsis: 2,3%, O-S Sacroiliac syndrome: 5,5%, D-S Sacroiliac syndrome: 6,3%, Miscellaneous: 1,6% Pregnant women from two maternity clinics, who are registered to deliver in two Danisch Hospitals. Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 97 week 33 of pregnancy week 33 of pregnancy Physical examination and Questionairre filled out by a physiotherapist. Pelvic joint pain divided into five subgroups: (1) pelvic girdle syndrome; (2) symphysiolysis; (3) one-sided sacroiliac syndrome; (4) double-sided sacroiliac syndorme; (5) miscellaneous 1460 Albert, Denmark PC 0.84 week 14 and 30 of pregnancy and 2 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after pregnancy Week 14, 30 of pregnancy, 2 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after delivery. Questionairres: selfreported Pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain: pain in the lower back, the buttocks, the symphysis, the groins or radiation into the legs during or after pregnancy 7526 Pregnant women recruited by midwives and gynecologists at 14 weeks of pregnancy PC Bastiaanssen, Netherlands
Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP/PGP moment of measurement Period of pain measurement Diagnositc method(s) Description of pain complaints Population size Design Study population First author (reference) country 71,7% overall LBPP, 12,1 anterior pelvic pain, 28,0% posterior pelvic pain, 59,8% anterior and posterior pelvic pain, During pregnancy Within 24 hours after delivery Questionairre: selfreported LBPP, pain drawing, visual analog scale Low back pain or pelvic pain (LBPP) during pregnancy was defined as " recurrent or continuous pain for more than 1 week from the lumbar spine or pelvis" during actual pregnancy 1114 All women give birth at the Umeå University hospital or the Sunderby Hospital Mogren, Sweden CS 46% PGP, 19% pain in the anterior pelvis, 14% uni- or bilateral pain in posterior pelvis, 4% pain in anterior and unilateral posterior pelvis, 5% pain in the anterior an bilateral posterior pelvis (a complete pelvic girdle syndrome) During pregnancy Retrospective Questionairre: selfreported Pelvic girdle pain was classified into five groups: (1) Pain in anterior pelvis, (2) Pain the posterior pelvis( uni- or bilateral), (3) Pain in anterior pelvis and unilateral posterior pelvis, (4) Pain in aterior pelvis and bilateral posterior pelvis (a complete pelvic girdle syndrome), (5) Pelvic pain, but no information 1817 All women in two municipalities (Nes and Sørum) in Norway with a prior delivery Robinson, Norway 0,5% (12 weeks of pregnancy), 7,3% (36 weeks of pregnancy), 4,4% (3months post partum), 2,4% (12motnhs post partum). Ten urban midwifery practices recruited nulliparous pregnant women Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 98 week 12 and 36 of pregnancy, 3 and 12 months after delivery At weeks 12 and 36 of pregnancy, 3 and 12 months after delivery Questionairres: selfreported 672 ND Pol, Netherlands PC 71,3% LBP, 46,2% LP, 64,7% PGP during pregnancy 31-38 weeks of pregnancy Questionairre: selfreported Low back pain, leg pain and pelvic girdle pain 1158 5 hospital departments of obstetrics and 19 primary care centers across five regions in Spain CS Kovacs, Spain pocket/digitaal
Page 1 and 2:
pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
Page 3 and 4:
Conformity declaration Author: Joha
Page 5 and 6:
5.2.2 Hypothesis 2 ................
Page 7 and 8:
Figure/Table # List of tables Descr
Page 9 and 10:
Figure/Table # List of figures Desc
Page 11 and 12:
1. Introduction This Master researc
Page 13 and 14:
2. Basics This study aims to assess
Page 15 and 16:
As third reasons there are the ridg
Page 17 and 18:
The anterior oblique sling: The ant
Page 19 and 20:
This description of the symptoms co
Page 21 and 22:
Table 2: Table by Bastiaanssen made
Page 23 and 24:
which the period of measurement aft
Page 25 and 26:
2.3.2 Clinical tests These are divi
Page 27 and 28:
For women with pregnancy-related po
Page 29 and 30:
muscle strength. The highest score
Page 31 and 32:
various aspects of the psychologica
Page 33 and 34:
3. Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 H0: The
Page 35 and 36:
4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Type o
Page 37 and 38:
These physical tests were first per
Page 39 and 40:
: With these data, I calculated how
Page 41 and 42:
No further differentiation was made
Page 43 and 44:
Initial posture therapist two: this
Page 45 and 46:
The columns contain the following i
Page 47 and 48: 5. Results 5.1 Population character
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2: Characteristics of the gr
Page 51 and 52: Following test combinations are com
Page 53 and 54: Table 15: Hypothesis 1: Characteris
Page 55 and 56: There are no significant difference
Page 57 and 58: Figure 6: Hypothesis 2: Different s
Page 59 and 60: Figure 8: Hypothesis 3: Characteris
Page 61 and 62: Figure 9: Hypothesis 3: Score on th
Page 63 and 64: Table 28: Hypothesis 4: Differences
Page 65 and 66: Figure 11: Hypothesis 4: Score on t
Page 67 and 68: Table 33: Hypothesis 5: Total score
Page 69 and 70: Characteristics on negative physica
Page 71 and 72: Characteristics and differences: Th
Page 73 and 74: We have also seen that for 35% of t
Page 75 and 76: 6.2.1 Population The recruitment of
Page 77 and 78: score of 2-3. From the perspective
Page 79 and 80: A reason that these women do not sc
Page 81 and 82: pain above the lumbar region. Howev
Page 83 and 84: tests exist out of the ASLR + the o
Page 85 and 86: As already mentioned, in the group
Page 87 and 88: 6.3.6 Hypothesis 6 H0: There is no
Page 89 and 90: o Also significant differences were
Page 91 and 92: Gutke, A., Josefsson, A. & Oberg, B
Page 93 and 94: Vleeming, A, 2007. The role of the
Page 95 and 96: 10 Appendix 10.1 Tables In this sec
Page 97: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 101 and 102: Table 12: Independent sample test f
Page 103 and 104: Table 25: Hypothesis 3: Independent
Page 105 and 106: 10.2 Informed Consent Permission-ba
Page 107 and 108: Strookje (leaflet) Ik wil meewerken
Page 109 and 110: 10.5 Dallas Pain Questionaire Naam_
Page 111 and 112: Niet veranderd Drastisch veranderd
Page 113: pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
show all

Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?