Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Recommendations

Info

pelvic instability. Here there is a significance of 86% which however statistically can not be called significant (should be 90% or higher). See the group statistics in table 11 and the independent sample test in table 12 in the appendix. Table 11: group statistics test 3 Dallasscore total 0-400 Group Statistics DPQ positive N Mean ASLR (-) & other (+) ASLR (+) & other (+) Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 51 Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 14 41,79 45,520 12,166 1 176,00 . . o Test 4: The comparison between the group of women with a negative score on the ASLR test and a negative score on the other test for pelvic instability, and the group of women who scored positive on the ASLR test and negative on the other test for pelvic instability did give a non significant score. The score here was 75% (p>0.010). See the group statistics in table 13 and the independent sample test in table 14 in the appendix. Table 13: group statistics test 4 Dallasscore total 0- 400 Group Statistics DPQ positive N Mean ASLR (-) & other (-) ASLR (+) & other (-) Characteristics negative group: Std. Deviatio n Std. Error Mean 10 36,40 40,749 12,886 7 105,14 72,846 27,533 In the group of the 8 women who score negative on the DPQ, it happens that the ASLR test scores negative but that they score positive on the other tests on instability. This has been experienced by 3 women (38%). These women score positive on the hip abduction-, hip external rotation- and the pubis- test without compression and negative on these tests with compression (see table 15 and related figure 4).
Table 15: Hypothesis 1: Characteristics negative DPQ group Negative DPQ group Aantal % -positive ASLR 0 0% -positive ASLR + positive other instability tests -negative ASLR + positive other instability tests Figure 4: Hypothesis 1: Characteristics negative DPQ group . 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Conclusion hypothesis 1: Following results are striking 69% at least one positive test for pelvic instability 25% a positive ASLR test 0 0% 3 38% 44% a ASLR a negative test, and one or more of the other positive tests for pelvic instability. Negative DPQ group 0% 0% -positive ASLR -positive ASLR + positive other instability tests It means that 44% of this group of women score negative score on the ASLR test, but score positive score in one or more of the other instability tests. This would mean that the test ASLR on his own is insufficient to diagnose pelvic instability. -negative ASLR + positive other instability tests All comparisons in the group of women who scored positive on the DPQ with the different combination tests of the ASLR and other tests for pelvic did not show significant differences. Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 52 38%
Page 1 and 2: pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
Page 3 and 4: Conformity declaration Author: Joha
Page 5 and 6: 5.2.2 Hypothesis 2 ................
Page 7 and 8: Figure/Table # List of tables Descr
Page 9 and 10: Figure/Table # List of figures Desc
Page 11 and 12: 1. Introduction This Master researc
Page 13 and 14: 2. Basics This study aims to assess
Page 15 and 16: As third reasons there are the ridg
Page 17 and 18: The anterior oblique sling: The ant
Page 19 and 20: This description of the symptoms co
Page 21 and 22: Table 2: Table by Bastiaanssen made
Page 23 and 24: which the period of measurement aft
Page 25 and 26: 2.3.2 Clinical tests These are divi
Page 27 and 28: For women with pregnancy-related po
Page 29 and 30: muscle strength. The highest score
Page 31 and 32: various aspects of the psychologica
Page 33 and 34: 3. Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 H0: The
Page 35 and 36: 4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Type o
Page 37 and 38: These physical tests were first per
Page 39 and 40: : With these data, I calculated how
Page 41 and 42: No further differentiation was made
Page 43 and 44: Initial posture therapist two: this
Page 45 and 46: The columns contain the following i
Page 47 and 48: 5. Results 5.1 Population character
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2: Characteristics of the gr
Page 51: Following test combinations are com
Page 55 and 56: There are no significant difference
Page 57 and 58: Figure 6: Hypothesis 2: Different s
Page 59 and 60: Figure 8: Hypothesis 3: Characteris
Page 61 and 62: Figure 9: Hypothesis 3: Score on th
Page 63 and 64: Table 28: Hypothesis 4: Differences
Page 65 and 66: Figure 11: Hypothesis 4: Score on t
Page 67 and 68: Table 33: Hypothesis 5: Total score
Page 69 and 70: Characteristics on negative physica
Page 71 and 72: Characteristics and differences: Th
Page 73 and 74: We have also seen that for 35% of t
Page 75 and 76: 6.2.1 Population The recruitment of
Page 77 and 78: score of 2-3. From the perspective
Page 79 and 80: A reason that these women do not sc
Page 81 and 82: pain above the lumbar region. Howev
Page 83 and 84: tests exist out of the ASLR + the o
Page 85 and 86: As already mentioned, in the group
Page 87 and 88: 6.3.6 Hypothesis 6 H0: There is no
Page 89 and 90: o Also significant differences were
Page 91 and 92: Gutke, A., Josefsson, A. & Oberg, B
Page 93 and 94: Vleeming, A, 2007. The role of the
Page 95 and 96: 10 Appendix 10.1 Tables In this sec
Page 97 and 98: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 99 and 100: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 101 and 102: Table 12: Independent sample test f
Page 103 and 104:
Table 25: Hypothesis 3: Independent
Page 105 and 106:
10.2 Informed Consent Permission-ba
Page 107 and 108:
Strookje (leaflet) Ik wil meewerken
Page 109 and 110:
10.5 Dallas Pain Questionaire Naam_
Page 111 and 112:
Niet veranderd Drastisch veranderd
Page 113:
pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
show all

Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?