Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Recommendations

Info

Figure/Table # Table 36 Table 37 Table 38 List of tables Description Hypothesis 5: Characteristics of the group of women scoring negativeon the physical Dallas Pain Questionnaire Hypothesis 5: Characteristics of the group of women scoring negativeon the physical Dallas Pain Questionnaire Hypothesis 6: Total score on the emotional part of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire Page Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Table 39 Hypothesis 6: Differences between the DPQ groups Page 70 Table 40 Hypothesis 6: Characteristics positive score on emotional Dallas Pain Questionnaire Page 71 Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 7
Figure/Table # List of figures Description Page Figure 1 The ASLR-test Page 35 Figure 2 Hypothesis 1: Characteristics of the groups based on the DPQ total score Page 48 Figure 3 Hypothesis 1: Characteristic positive DPQ group Page 49 Figure 4 Hypothesis 1: Characteristic negative DPQ group Page 52 Figure 5 Hypothesis 2: Group characteristic on instability tests total Page 53 Figure 6 Hypothesis 2: Different scores positive instability group Page 56 Figure 7 Hypothesis 2: Different scores positive instability group Page 57 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Hypothesis 3: Characteristic groups based on other instability tests Hypothesis 3: Score on the characteristics of the group of women which scored positive on at least one of the other pelvic instability tests Hypothesis 4: Instability score based on Active Straight Leg Raising test characteristics only Hypothesis 4: Score on the characteristics of the positive ASLR group Hypothesis 4: Score on characteristics of the negative ASLR group Hypothesis 5: Total score on the physical part of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (positive or negative). Hypothesis 5: Characteristics of the women scoring positive on the physical Dallas Pain Questionnaire Hypothesis 5: Characteristics of the group of women scoring negative on the physical Dallas Pain Questionnaire Hypothesis 6: Total score on the emotional part of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire Hypothesis 6: Characteristics positive score on emotional Dallas Pain Questionnaire Page 58 Page 60 Page 61 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 71 Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 8
Page 1 and 2: pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
Page 3 and 4: Conformity declaration Author: Joha
Page 5 and 6: 5.2.2 Hypothesis 2 ................
Page 7: Figure/Table # List of tables Descr
Page 11 and 12: 1. Introduction This Master researc
Page 13 and 14: 2. Basics This study aims to assess
Page 15 and 16: As third reasons there are the ridg
Page 17 and 18: The anterior oblique sling: The ant
Page 19 and 20: This description of the symptoms co
Page 21 and 22: Table 2: Table by Bastiaanssen made
Page 23 and 24: which the period of measurement aft
Page 25 and 26: 2.3.2 Clinical tests These are divi
Page 27 and 28: For women with pregnancy-related po
Page 29 and 30: muscle strength. The highest score
Page 31 and 32: various aspects of the psychologica
Page 33 and 34: 3. Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 H0: The
Page 35 and 36: 4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Type o
Page 37 and 38: These physical tests were first per
Page 39 and 40: : With these data, I calculated how
Page 41 and 42: No further differentiation was made
Page 43 and 44: Initial posture therapist two: this
Page 45 and 46: The columns contain the following i
Page 47 and 48: 5. Results 5.1 Population character
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2: Characteristics of the gr
Page 51 and 52: Following test combinations are com
Page 53 and 54: Table 15: Hypothesis 1: Characteris
Page 55 and 56: There are no significant difference
Page 57 and 58: Figure 6: Hypothesis 2: Different s
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 8: Hypothesis 3: Characteris
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 9: Hypothesis 3: Score on th
Page 63 and 64:
Table 28: Hypothesis 4: Differences
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 11: Hypothesis 4: Score on t
Page 67 and 68:
Table 33: Hypothesis 5: Total score
Page 69 and 70:
Characteristics on negative physica
Page 71 and 72:
Characteristics and differences: Th
Page 73 and 74:
We have also seen that for 35% of t
Page 75 and 76:
6.2.1 Population The recruitment of
Page 77 and 78:
score of 2-3. From the perspective
Page 79 and 80:
A reason that these women do not sc
Page 81 and 82:
pain above the lumbar region. Howev
Page 83 and 84:
tests exist out of the ASLR + the o
Page 85 and 86:
As already mentioned, in the group
Page 87 and 88:
6.3.6 Hypothesis 6 H0: There is no
Page 89 and 90:
o Also significant differences were
Page 91 and 92:
Gutke, A., Josefsson, A. & Oberg, B
Page 93 and 94:
Vleeming, A, 2007. The role of the
Page 95 and 96:
10 Appendix 10.1 Tables In this sec
Page 97 and 98:
Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 99 and 100:
Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 101 and 102:
Table 12: Independent sample test f
Page 103 and 104:
Table 25: Hypothesis 3: Independent
Page 105 and 106:
10.2 Informed Consent Permission-ba
Page 107 and 108:
Strookje (leaflet) Ik wil meewerken
Page 109 and 110:
10.5 Dallas Pain Questionaire Naam_
Page 111 and 112:
Niet veranderd Drastisch veranderd
Page 113:
pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
show all

Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?