Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

Recommendations

Info

62% (p>0.05) is included in the score of the physical. See the results in table 18 here below (group statistics) and table 19 (Hypothesis 2: Independent sample test) in the appendix. Table 18: Hypothesis 2: Group statistics all pelvic instability tests Group Statistics Dallasscore total 0-400 Section 1+2/205 Section 3+4/195 Pelvic instability total (other + ASLR) Characteristics positive score: N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 0 15 24.27 37.188 9.602 1 25 59.88 65.173 13.035 0 15 12.93 19.757 5.101 1 25 34.48 35.634 7.127 0 15 11.33 20.569 5.311 1 25 25.40 35.294 7.059 The different scores within the group of women scoring positive for pelvic instability has the following distribution (see also table 20 and related figure 6).: 32% of the women scored positive on the ASLR test 88% of the women scored positive on the DPQ 32% of women have a positive score on the DPQ and positive scores on the ASLR. 56% of the women with a positive instability score had a negative score on the ASLR, and a positive score on the DPQ 68% of the women scored positive on other pelvic instability tests A positive score on the ASLR test and a negative DPQ is not in this group. Table 20: Hypothesis 2: Different scores positive instability group. Positive instability group: Number % Positive ASLR 8 32% Positive DPQ 22 88% Positive DPQ and ASLR 8 32% Negative ASLR and Positive DPQ Positive ASLR and Negative DPQ 14 56% 0 0% Positive other 17 68% Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 55
Figure 6: Hypothesis 2: Different scores positive instability group. 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 32% Positive ASLR Positive DPQ Characteristics negative score: The different scores within the group of women scoring negative for pelvic instability has the following distribution (see also table 21 and related figure 7).: 33% In the group of women who scored negative on the instability shows that the ASLR test scores negative, but the DPQ scores positive 0% show a positive ASLR and positive DPQ 0% show only a positive ASLR Positive instability group: 88% 32% Positive DPQ and ASLR Negative ASLR and Positive DPQ Table 21: Hypothesis 2: Different scores of the negative instability group. Positive ASLR and Negative DPQ Positive other tests Negative instability group: Number % Positive ASLR 0 0% Positive ASLR and Positive DPQ 0 0% Negative ASLR and Positive DPQ 5 33% Osteopathie Schule Deutschland Dresden International University Page 56 56% 0% 68%
Page 1 and 2:
pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
Page 3 and 4:
Conformity declaration Author: Joha
Page 5 and 6: 5.2.2 Hypothesis 2 ................
Page 7 and 8: Figure/Table # List of tables Descr
Page 9 and 10: Figure/Table # List of figures Desc
Page 11 and 12: 1. Introduction This Master researc
Page 13 and 14: 2. Basics This study aims to assess
Page 15 and 16: As third reasons there are the ridg
Page 17 and 18: The anterior oblique sling: The ant
Page 19 and 20: This description of the symptoms co
Page 21 and 22: Table 2: Table by Bastiaanssen made
Page 23 and 24: which the period of measurement aft
Page 25 and 26: 2.3.2 Clinical tests These are divi
Page 27 and 28: For women with pregnancy-related po
Page 29 and 30: muscle strength. The highest score
Page 31 and 32: various aspects of the psychologica
Page 33 and 34: 3. Hypotheses Hypothesis 1 H0: The
Page 35 and 36: 4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Type o
Page 37 and 38: These physical tests were first per
Page 39 and 40: : With these data, I calculated how
Page 41 and 42: No further differentiation was made
Page 43 and 44: Initial posture therapist two: this
Page 45 and 46: The columns contain the following i
Page 47 and 48: 5. Results 5.1 Population character
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2: Characteristics of the gr
Page 51 and 52: Following test combinations are com
Page 53 and 54: Table 15: Hypothesis 1: Characteris
Page 55: There are no significant difference
Page 59 and 60: Figure 8: Hypothesis 3: Characteris
Page 61 and 62: Figure 9: Hypothesis 3: Score on th
Page 63 and 64: Table 28: Hypothesis 4: Differences
Page 65 and 66: Figure 11: Hypothesis 4: Score on t
Page 67 and 68: Table 33: Hypothesis 5: Total score
Page 69 and 70: Characteristics on negative physica
Page 71 and 72: Characteristics and differences: Th
Page 73 and 74: We have also seen that for 35% of t
Page 75 and 76: 6.2.1 Population The recruitment of
Page 77 and 78: score of 2-3. From the perspective
Page 79 and 80: A reason that these women do not sc
Page 81 and 82: pain above the lumbar region. Howev
Page 83 and 84: tests exist out of the ASLR + the o
Page 85 and 86: As already mentioned, in the group
Page 87 and 88: 6.3.6 Hypothesis 6 H0: There is no
Page 89 and 90: o Also significant differences were
Page 91 and 92: Gutke, A., Josefsson, A. & Oberg, B
Page 93 and 94: Vleeming, A, 2007. The role of the
Page 95 and 96: 10 Appendix 10.1 Tables In this sec
Page 97 and 98: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 99 and 100: Prevalence of Pregnancy related LBP
Page 101 and 102: Table 12: Independent sample test f
Page 103 and 104: Table 25: Hypothesis 3: Independent
Page 105 and 106: 10.2 Informed Consent Permission-ba
Page 107 and 108:
Strookje (leaflet) Ik wil meewerken
Page 109 and 110:
10.5 Dallas Pain Questionaire Naam_
Page 111 and 112:
Niet veranderd Drastisch veranderd
Page 113:
pelvic girdle pain and relevance of
show all

Pelvic girdle pain and relevance of ASLR testing: A ... - Cindy Verheul

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?