02.04.2013 Views

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> from Pericles to Measurement • 9<br />

and treasure to promote freedom see results that are worth the expenditures<br />

in increased freedom (or at least the version <strong>of</strong> freedom being measured)<br />

and improved outcomes.2<br />

Measurement is also required for Q5, Q6, and Q7. Without an objective<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> freedom, it is impossible to determine in any quantitative<br />

way whether action X leads to increases or decreases in freedom;<br />

whether it lends stability to freedom or causes instability. Given a) that<br />

many nations have made great sacrifices to spread their versions <strong>of</strong> freedom<br />

and b) the possibility that some version(s) <strong>of</strong> freedom creates better<br />

lives for people than others, answering Q5, Q6, and Q7 becomes highly<br />

significant, in conjunction with Q3.<br />

2 Concepts <strong>of</strong> freedom<br />

This literature review will, by necessity, discuss broad themes. Hundreds<br />

<strong>of</strong> pages <strong>of</strong> densely-argued work have been written over the smallest<br />

details in the debate and cannot be dealt with in a review <strong>of</strong> this scope.<br />

The paper also will assume an informed readership that is already familiar<br />

with basic concepts, so these will not be discussed at length in this essay.<br />

Berlin<br />

Isaiah Berlin’s 1958 essay, “Two Concepts <strong>of</strong> Liberty,” provides an important<br />

conceptual tool to examine notions <strong>of</strong> freedom, so we will begin<br />

there and then move backward to look at earlier views <strong>of</strong> freedom, before<br />

examining more current literature. Following Berlin, this paper will treat<br />

the terms “freedom” and “liberty” as being interchangeable, though it<br />

typically will speak <strong>of</strong> “freedom.” Some thinkers have tried to distinguish<br />

between liberty and freedom, but such efforts appear forced and hinge<br />

on idiosyncratic definitions <strong>of</strong> the two—distinctions without differences.<br />

None have caught on.<br />

Berlin’s two concepts were “negative” and “positive” freedom. The negative<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> freedom concerns lack <strong>of</strong> humanly imposed barriers to<br />

action. “By being free in this sense I mean not being interfered with by others.<br />

The wider the area <strong>of</strong> non-interference, the wider my freedom” (Berlin,<br />

1958: 170). Positive freedom, on the other hand, involves freeing oneself<br />

from whatever constraints one imposes on oneself. This enables the person<br />

to find his or her true self. It implies some sort <strong>of</strong> higher and lower plane <strong>of</strong><br />

being with the higher plane freeing itself from constraints imposed by the<br />

lower plane. For example, class consciousness would have been perceived<br />

by many communists as part <strong>of</strong> a lower self, blocking the release and freedom<br />

one experiences under the higher form <strong>of</strong> socialist liberty.<br />

2 Granted, much international maneuvering is for geopolitical reasons, but, at least for some<br />

nations, the question <strong>of</strong> whether the lives <strong>of</strong> people are improved is important.<br />

www.freetheworld.com • www.fraserinstitute.org • Fraser Institute ©2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!