Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> from Pericles to Measurement • 17<br />
states, “[C]ommerce inspires in men a vivid love <strong>of</strong> individual independence.<br />
Commerce supplies their needs, satisfies their desires, without<br />
the intervention <strong>of</strong> the authorities…. [N]ot only does it emancipate<br />
individuals, but, by creating credit, it places authority itself in a position<br />
<strong>of</strong> dependence.” Despite the earlier quote, he credits the commerce <strong>of</strong><br />
Athens for allowing a somewhat higher level <strong>of</strong> individual freedom than<br />
other Greek states.9<br />
Constant, Stark, and Hanson are on to something that all too <strong>of</strong>ten has<br />
gotten lost in the recent philosophical literature on freedom, and that is<br />
the link between property rights and commerce, or economic freedom,<br />
and other freedoms. This will be discussed later.<br />
It goes virtually without saying that the ancients did have versions <strong>of</strong><br />
positive freedom, as is evidenced in Plato’s Republic, for example, or in<br />
sects like the Pythagoreans. As this is not contested, to my knowledge,<br />
nothing further will be added.<br />
This section has suggested that the concepts <strong>of</strong> both negative and, less<br />
controversially, positive freedom were alive in the classical world, though<br />
it agrees with Stark about the lack <strong>of</strong> universality in the concept <strong>of</strong> freedom.<br />
One could go further and suggest that the much earlier Epic <strong>of</strong><br />
Gilgamesh reveals a very human joy in being unconstrained in free action<br />
and even a version <strong>of</strong> positive freedom when Gilgamesh understands and<br />
accepts his mortality. It is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this review to explore other<br />
cultures, though this would be an important endeavor. Nonetheless, the<br />
evidence presented strongly suggests that the ideas <strong>of</strong> both negative and<br />
positive freedom are not simply modern constructs.<br />
The Enlightenment<br />
The Enlightenment thinkers were not mere theorists: they had a world<br />
to remake. Thomas Hobbes, the first great English theorist <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Enlightenment, saw a continental European world that had virtually collapsed<br />
into flames and blood. Then the relatively calm England <strong>of</strong> his<br />
youth fell into civil war in as the Roundheads fought to remove Charles I,<br />
the bloodiest internal conflict since Henry VII seized the English throne<br />
almost 150 years earlier. This is important context to understanding<br />
not just Hobbes, but the political thinking <strong>of</strong> all early and perhaps all<br />
Enlightenment thinkers.<br />
This section focuses on three thinkers: Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau.<br />
With the possible exception <strong>of</strong> Rousseau, these are not unusually vague<br />
thinkers. Yet, for each, there is considerable dispute over what they actually<br />
meant, how they tied their premises to their logic and then to their<br />
9 Constant is perhaps too optimistic about the stability and impact <strong>of</strong> commerce: “Hence it<br />
follows that an age must come in which commerce replaces war. We have reached this age.”<br />
www.freetheworld.com • www.fraserinstitute.org • Fraser Institute ©2012