Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
202 • <strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Worldwide</strong> <strong>Index</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong><br />
deviation from traditional caste duties might magically hurt even the reincarnation<br />
prospects <strong>of</strong> fellow caste members, it has usually been punished.<br />
Lower castes have frequently resorted to excommunication. Certainly, the<br />
caste system has made upward mobility by economic success less likely in<br />
India than either in China or Europe. Religious constraints on economic<br />
freedom had to interfere with pr<strong>of</strong>it-maximization and economic growth.<br />
In particular, entrepreneurship was much more accessible to members <strong>of</strong><br />
the traditional trading castes than to others. While their members enjoyed<br />
superior access to opportunity, most Indians did not.17<br />
Economic backwardness in India and elsewhere is sometimes<br />
explained by colonial exploitation. There is no doubt that exploitation<br />
has happened, but exploitation does not usually lead to development in<br />
the exploiting countries. Iberian rule over Latin America illustrates this<br />
point. It helped neither Spain nor Portugal to develop. Moreover, ruling<br />
classes other than Western colonialists have exploited their subjects, too.<br />
Maddison provides a quantitative estimate <strong>of</strong> the exploitation <strong>of</strong> India by<br />
the Mughals and their British successors: “The income which the Mughal<br />
elite, native princes, and zamindars managed to squeeze from the rural<br />
population was proportionately quite large. It amounted to about 15 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> national income … But, by the end <strong>of</strong> British rule, the successors<br />
<strong>of</strong> the old elite got only 3 percent” (2007: 123).<br />
In sum, the rise <strong>of</strong> the West and the stagnation <strong>of</strong> China or India can<br />
be explained by divergent institutional developments. In the West, political<br />
fragmentation and competition forced even autocratic (or “absolutist”)<br />
rulers to respect the private property rights <strong>of</strong> producers and traders<br />
much earlier and to a greater degree than Asian rulers did. Because <strong>of</strong><br />
better exit opportunities for common people, there was more economic<br />
freedom in the West than in Asia. Without economic freedom, incentives<br />
for hard work suffer. Political fragmentation in the West also contributed<br />
to scarcity prices and a rational allocation <strong>of</strong> resources as well as<br />
to decentralized decision-making and the application <strong>of</strong> knowledge that<br />
is dispersed among millions <strong>of</strong> heads.<br />
Socialism in Asia<br />
Although Europeans invented socialism, i.e., a program to roll back<br />
economic freedom, the West suffered much less from it than did Asia.<br />
From the 1950s to 1980, per capita incomes in China and India were fairly<br />
improve their status by leading a “purer” form <strong>of</strong> life. If this implies giving up dirty work,<br />
Sanskritization may reinforce poverty.<br />
17 According to the 1931 census in British India, trading castes, like the Baniya, had much<br />
higher literacy rates than even the higher-ranking Brahmins. Obviously, literacy is useful<br />
in business (Wolcott, 2010: 463).<br />
Fraser Institute ©2012 • www.fraserinstitute.org • www.freetheworld.com