02.04.2013 Views

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> from Pericles to Measurement • 51<br />

responsibility for at least a subset <strong>of</strong> their actions. We are not attempting<br />

to measure personal responsibility, but if we found such measures, they<br />

may be potential proxies for freedom.<br />

Weighting schemes<br />

Many weighting schemes are possible, and not simply weighted addition.<br />

It may be that freedoms are more than their sum. For instance, having<br />

both freedom <strong>of</strong> speech and freedom <strong>of</strong> assembly in religion may create<br />

more (or less) than twice the value <strong>of</strong> having only one <strong>of</strong> the freedoms.<br />

<strong>Freedom</strong>s may be multiplicative and/or they may be non-linear, so that<br />

one freedom is worth “1,” two are worth “2,” and three are worth “4,”<br />

and so on. We need a better understanding <strong>of</strong> what freedom is, how it<br />

should be measured, and what measures are available before this issue<br />

can be addressed.<br />

Scale<br />

We have not addressed the question <strong>of</strong> scale: can A be slightly freer to do<br />

X than B? Franco’s Spain was not free, but it was freer than Stalin’s Russia.<br />

Can such gradations be captured? Carter (1999: 220) notes constraint<br />

variables: physical impossibility, threats, and difficulty, though the list<br />

could easily be made longer. He also argues that at a conceptual level, a<br />

measure <strong>of</strong> freedom should consider only “physical impossibility” supplemented<br />

by knowledge <strong>of</strong> the probability <strong>of</strong> future restraints on freedom,<br />

like being sent to a concentration camp for certain speech. That speech<br />

is not physically impossible, but has a high probability <strong>of</strong> reducing freedom<br />

in the future. Whether one accepts this or not, developing a freedom<br />

scale will be difficult.<br />

It is also unclear whether a cardinal or only an ordinal measuring system<br />

will be possible.<br />

Race, etc.<br />

Governments can restrict freedom based on race, gender, ethnicity, etc.<br />

However, this can also involved a complicated interplay between government<br />

coercion and society. Measuring this will be a great challenge. This<br />

also complicates weighting. If a minority <strong>of</strong>, say, 20 percent <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

lacks a certain freedom, does this mean that the measure is weighted<br />

by 20 percent?<br />

www.freetheworld.com • www.fraserinstitute.org • Fraser Institute ©2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!