Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> from Pericles to Measurement • 39<br />
I will not review other similar charters, such as the Organization<br />
<strong>of</strong> American States’ Declaration <strong>of</strong> the Rights and Duties <strong>of</strong> Man, African<br />
Charter on <strong>Human</strong> and Peoples’ Rights, or the Council <strong>of</strong> Europe’s<br />
Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Human</strong> Rights and Fundamental <strong>Freedom</strong>s.<br />
They have about the same mix as the UN Declaration.<br />
Despite the absence <strong>of</strong> claim-freedoms from these charters, today such<br />
claim-freedoms seem increasingly common. The United Nations’ (2000)<br />
<strong>Human</strong> Development Report: <strong>Human</strong> Rights and <strong>Human</strong> Development is a<br />
prime example. This report comes up with the remarkable discovery <strong>of</strong><br />
seven essential freedoms, printed on the cover page, the inside cover page,<br />
and described inside:<br />
Today, with impressive achievements and a significant unfinished<br />
agenda in human rights and human development, the struggle continues<br />
for realizing and securing human freedoms in seven areas:<br />
• <strong>Freedom</strong> from discrimination—for equality<br />
• <strong>Freedom</strong> from want—for a decent standard <strong>of</strong> living<br />
• <strong>Freedom</strong> for the realization <strong>of</strong> one’s human potential<br />
• <strong>Freedom</strong> from fear—with no threats to personal security<br />
• <strong>Freedom</strong> from injustice<br />
• <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>of</strong> participation, expression and association<br />
• <strong>Freedom</strong> for decent work—without exploitation<br />
(United Nations, 2000)<br />
The first, fifth, and the sixth areas are related to negative freedom, or at least<br />
the conditions required for negative freedom,23 the third appears to reflect<br />
a positive freedom, and the rest are claim-freedoms. Many <strong>of</strong> the classic<br />
examples <strong>of</strong> negative freedom—assembly, for example—are missing.<br />
This leaves public discourse, as represented by the world’s most important<br />
charters <strong>of</strong> rights and freedoms, with a mish-mash <strong>of</strong> negative, positive,<br />
and claim-freedoms, mixed together as if they were all birds <strong>of</strong> a<br />
feather. This creates real confusion and enables just about any interest<br />
group to declare that the key points <strong>of</strong> its ideology represent freedom, and<br />
to be able to take that message to the public.<br />
23 Hayek (1960) throughout his work emphasizes the need for an impartial justice system,<br />
or “freedom from injustice,” as a necessary support for freedom. The problem with the<br />
United Nations formulation is that justice is, in fact, justice, not freedom, though it may<br />
be a necessary condition for freedom.<br />
www.freetheworld.com • www.fraserinstitute.org • Fraser Institute ©2012