Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> from Pericles to Measurement • 47<br />
Appendix A: Developing a Measurement<br />
Taxonomy and Other Puzzles<br />
This appendix has a limited goal: simply to lay out some <strong>of</strong> the challenges<br />
faced in developing a freedom measure. It makes no claim to being a full<br />
menu <strong>of</strong> these challenges. It merely aims to develop a partial menu <strong>of</strong><br />
some important items.<br />
Taxonomy<br />
An important step in developing a taxonomy <strong>of</strong> freedom is to clear up a<br />
confusion found almost everywhere in discussing freedom. Policy papers,<br />
leaders, and even thinkers talk about freedom <strong>of</strong> the press, freedom <strong>of</strong><br />
religion, political freedom, freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, and so on, as if they are<br />
talking similar about similar things.<br />
These are not similar things. There are two distinct, logical dimensions<br />
<strong>of</strong> freedom being confused here, labeled, arbitrarily, “spheres” and<br />
“actions” <strong>of</strong> freedom. By sphere, I mean differing aspects <strong>of</strong> behavior;<br />
for example, political versus religious versus civic or personal activities.<br />
By actions, I simply mean actions in these spheres. Here I have in mind<br />
things like freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, freedom <strong>of</strong> assembly, freedom <strong>of</strong> the press,<br />
and so on. These are the traditional negative freedoms.<br />
A simple matrix for ‘Country X’ makes clear why these are separate:<br />
Spheres <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Freedom</strong><br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> Actions<br />
Speech Assembly Press Etc.<br />
Personal 4.7 3.6 2.1 …<br />
Political 4 1 4.5 …<br />
Religious 1 3.5 0.9 …<br />
Etc. … … … …<br />
In the above matrix, Country X allows moderately good freedom <strong>of</strong><br />
speech in religion, but suppresses religious assemblies and press discussions<br />
<strong>of</strong> religion. X’s security forces are much more tolerant <strong>of</strong> political<br />
discussions than they are <strong>of</strong> politically-oriented assembly or journalism.<br />
Thus, for example, it does not make sense to talk about religious freedom<br />
and freedom <strong>of</strong> the media as if they were similar creatures. A free<br />
media can explore political, social, religious issues, etc. However, religious<br />
freedom can be expressed in the media, association, speech, etc.<br />
Once the link between democracy and political freedom is broken,<br />
the question arises as to whether political freedom is a specific sphere <strong>of</strong><br />
www.freetheworld.com • www.fraserinstitute.org • Fraser Institute ©2012