02.04.2013 Views

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> from Pericles to Measurement • 47<br />

Appendix A: Developing a Measurement<br />

Taxonomy and Other Puzzles<br />

This appendix has a limited goal: simply to lay out some <strong>of</strong> the challenges<br />

faced in developing a freedom measure. It makes no claim to being a full<br />

menu <strong>of</strong> these challenges. It merely aims to develop a partial menu <strong>of</strong><br />

some important items.<br />

Taxonomy<br />

An important step in developing a taxonomy <strong>of</strong> freedom is to clear up a<br />

confusion found almost everywhere in discussing freedom. Policy papers,<br />

leaders, and even thinkers talk about freedom <strong>of</strong> the press, freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

religion, political freedom, freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, and so on, as if they are<br />

talking similar about similar things.<br />

These are not similar things. There are two distinct, logical dimensions<br />

<strong>of</strong> freedom being confused here, labeled, arbitrarily, “spheres” and<br />

“actions” <strong>of</strong> freedom. By sphere, I mean differing aspects <strong>of</strong> behavior;<br />

for example, political versus religious versus civic or personal activities.<br />

By actions, I simply mean actions in these spheres. Here I have in mind<br />

things like freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, freedom <strong>of</strong> assembly, freedom <strong>of</strong> the press,<br />

and so on. These are the traditional negative freedoms.<br />

A simple matrix for ‘Country X’ makes clear why these are separate:<br />

Spheres <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Freedom</strong><br />

<strong>Freedom</strong> Actions<br />

Speech Assembly Press Etc.<br />

Personal 4.7 3.6 2.1 …<br />

Political 4 1 4.5 …<br />

Religious 1 3.5 0.9 …<br />

Etc. … … … …<br />

In the above matrix, Country X allows moderately good freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

speech in religion, but suppresses religious assemblies and press discussions<br />

<strong>of</strong> religion. X’s security forces are much more tolerant <strong>of</strong> political<br />

discussions than they are <strong>of</strong> politically-oriented assembly or journalism.<br />

Thus, for example, it does not make sense to talk about religious freedom<br />

and freedom <strong>of</strong> the media as if they were similar creatures. A free<br />

media can explore political, social, religious issues, etc. However, religious<br />

freedom can be expressed in the media, association, speech, etc.<br />

Once the link between democracy and political freedom is broken,<br />

the question arises as to whether political freedom is a specific sphere <strong>of</strong><br />

www.freetheworld.com • www.fraserinstitute.org • Fraser Institute ©2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!