03.04.2013 Views

The Green caldron - University Library

The Green caldron - University Library

The Green caldron - University Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

March, 1962 ,<br />

TO<br />

President Kennedy Is a<br />

Republican—Valid<br />

Judith Landesman<br />

Rhetoric 102, <strong>The</strong>me 4<br />

9<br />

UNDERSTAND THE SYLLOGISM, ONE MUST FIRST UN-<br />

derstand what the primary background of the syllogism is. Man answers<br />

questions by means of logic. He reasons his problems out by three different<br />

methods : analogy, induction, and deduction. Analogy is defined in Form and<br />

Thought in Prose as "a. comparison between two things together with the<br />

argument that, if they are alike in several ways, they are probably alike in<br />

another." Induction is a method of reasoning which takes a number of<br />

particular happenings or truths and shows them to be leading to a general truth.<br />

This is the method used in experimental science. Deduction is a method of<br />

reasoning which takes a general truth and derives from it certain particular<br />

truths.<br />

<strong>The</strong> syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning. It consists of three<br />

propositions: the major premise, the minor premise, and the conclusion.<br />

Each proposition consists of two terms dealing with classes of things. To<br />

reach a conclusion, naturally, each of these terms is used twice. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

proposition (normally, the major premise) introduces two of the terms, e.g..<br />

People who live in Urbana are people living in the State of Illinois. <strong>The</strong> second<br />

proposition (in customary usage, the minor premise) repeats one of the<br />

terms and adds the third, e.g.. Those people living in the State of Illinois are<br />

people who live in the United States. <strong>The</strong> third proposition omits the term<br />

which has been repeated and forms the other two terms into what is called<br />

the conclusion, e.g.. People who live in Urbana are people who live in the<br />

United States.<br />

One can easily see that the introduction of a fourth term will completely<br />

obliterate the logic of the syllogism. For example, the syllogism:<br />

All girls are good-looking creatures.<br />

Tony Perkins is a young man.<br />

Tony Perkins is a good-looking creature.<br />

Now, Tony Perkins might be a good-looking creature, but this deduction<br />

cannot be satisfactory as far as the logic is this particular syllogism is con-<br />

cerned because of the addition of the fourth term. If the term all girls in the<br />

first proposition were changed to all young men, the syllogism would be<br />

logically correct.<br />

Sometimes, because of a mistake in the definition of terms, one word or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!