03.04.2013 Views

The Green caldron - University Library

The Green caldron - University Library

The Green caldron - University Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

May, 1962 13<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are three principal characters—the man, Screwtape, and Wormwood.<br />

<strong>The</strong> man represents a general class rather than an individual. His<br />

plight is similar to that of thousands of others like him. Screwtape is a crafty<br />

devil, well practiced in the art of tempting. He is proud of his achievements<br />

and of the position that he holds in the underworld. Wormwood is a young<br />

novice tempter, sure of himself and eager for spectacular accomplishments<br />

and for recognition.<br />

Lewis wrote this book with the intention of helping people understand<br />

the relation between religion and everyday life, and he has produced some-<br />

thing of value. <strong>The</strong> Screzvtape Letters was not intended simply to be read<br />

for pleasure, although it is enjoyable to read. It is skillfully written and will<br />

provide much material for thought for the careful reader.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y Aren't All Our Fault<br />

Jane Combs<br />

Rhetoric 101, <strong>The</strong>me 10<br />

XK k MERICA'S FOREIGN POLICY IS IRRESPONSIBLE. HER<br />

/-\ Secretary of State, President, and ambassadors are tactless and un-<br />

trained in diplomacy. <strong>The</strong>re is disagreement among American rep-<br />

resentatives abroad. Americans make no effort to know the people in other<br />

countries." So say the critics, Europeans and hyper-sensitive Americans.<br />

I agree—to a slight extent. But I don't believe our foreign policy is as careless<br />

and irresponsible as we are frequently told. In the first place, our judges,<br />

the Europeans—Germans, Italians, Frenchmen—have no more experience<br />

than we in handling a small new world with big new crises. I concede they<br />

do have experience in handling affairs concerning limited geographic and<br />

political regions : Germany vs. France, France vs. England, Balkans vs. Rus-<br />

sia. And they do have experience handling limited physical forces not capable<br />

of complete devastation. That does not give them the authority to appraise<br />

accurately and criticize a government whose affairs encompass, involve, and<br />

affect the affairs of every other nation on earth. <strong>The</strong>y are very much involved,<br />

granted, but the cold war is acknowledged to be a contention between the<br />

two biggest powers, Russia and the United States. <strong>The</strong> Europeans are<br />

not qualified to judge us merely because of their alleged experience in<br />

diplomacy. What is diplomacy? Is it that which involved Europe in a Triple<br />

Entente and a Triple Alliance? Do we not have a new form of diplomacy,<br />

one not dependent on the whims and lusts of a prime minister or figurehead

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!