03.04.2013 Views

The Green caldron - University Library

The Green caldron - University Library

The Green caldron - University Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Green</strong> Caldron<br />

phrase has more than one meaning and acts as a fourth term. For example<br />

No dog has two tails.<br />

One dog has one more tail than no dog.<br />

One dog has three tails.<br />

<strong>The</strong> confusion in this syllogism arises from the double meaning of the<br />

term no dog. In the first proposition, no dog means not any dog. In the<br />

second, no dog means a nonexistent dog. <strong>The</strong> same words, no dog, represent<br />

two different ideas and, therefore, two different terms, bringing the total<br />

number of terms in the syllogism to four.<br />

To be of any use, the syllogism has to be based on valid logic. Validity<br />

is not to be confused with truth. For example, the syllogism<br />

All the girls at Allen Residence Hall are <strong>University</strong> of Illinois students.<br />

Some <strong>University</strong> of Illinois students are students who do not study enough.<br />

Some girls at Allen Residence Hall are students who do not study enough.<br />

Each of the premises is true, but the syllogism itself is invalid. It is<br />

invalid because the middle term is not specific enough. Perhaps, none of<br />

the <strong>University</strong> of Illinois students who do not study enough are girls at<br />

Allen Residence Hall. Conversely, all the premises may be false and the<br />

syllogism still be logically valid. For example, the syllogism<br />

All Chicago voters are Republicans.<br />

President Kennedy is a Chicago voter.<br />

President Kennedy is a Republican.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are a great many rules as to what comprises a good syllogism.<br />

Let it suffice to say the syllogism is a method of deduction by which two<br />

premises lead to a conclusion. It can be of great value if the premises are<br />

true and the reasoning is valid.<br />

ON<br />

Two Bison<br />

Elaine Miller<br />

Rhetoric 101, <strong>The</strong>me 6<br />

THE WALL OF A CAVE NEAR MONTIGNAC IN FRANCE<br />

is a painting in some ways as exciting as any work the world of art<br />

has to offer. <strong>The</strong> figures were "painted" by rubbing natural oxides<br />

into the stone walls. In many instances the actual surface of the stone is in-<br />

corporated into the painting. Although the picture was done fifteen or thirty<br />

thousand years ago, the images are amazingly preserved and convey a vivid<br />

freshness. <strong>The</strong> most widely known section of the wall in the Cave of<br />

Lascaux is that of the "Two Bison." <strong>The</strong> tribal artists who decorated the<br />

walls of this ritual cave possessed the mysterious ability to create a work<br />

:<br />

:<br />

:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!