Conspectus cobitidum - Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research
Conspectus cobitidum - Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research
Conspectus cobitidum - Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10.26.3 Paracobitis iranica, CMK 21898, 60.8 mm SL; Iran:<br />
Qomtra.<br />
10.26.3 Paracobitis iranica Nalbant & Bianco, 1999<br />
Paracobitis iranica Nalbant & Bianco, 1999: 114, fig. 13<br />
(type locality: Iran: Qom River near Qom City [34°38'N<br />
50°53'E]; holotype: IZA 7831; adjective, -us, -a, -um)<br />
10.26.4 Paracobitis longicauda (Kessler)<br />
Cobitis longicauda Kessler, 1872: 65, pl. 11 figs. 30–31 (type<br />
locality: Uzbekistan: Ak-Darya [tributary <strong>of</strong> Zeravshan];<br />
holotype: ZISP 2686; compound noun, indeclinable)<br />
Taxonomic notes. Treated as valid species by Prok<strong>of</strong>iev<br />
(2009b: 888).<br />
10.26.5 Paracobitis malapterura (Valenciennes, in Cuvier<br />
& Valenciennes, 1846)<br />
Cobitis malapterura Valenciennes, in Cuvier & Valenciennes,<br />
1846: 88, pl. 523 (type locality: "sent from Syria"; syntypes:<br />
MNHN 3962 [1], B-3070 [1], Bertin & Estève,<br />
1948: 96; Eschmeyer & Fricke, 2010; compound adjective,<br />
-us, -a, -um [as shown in French translation by Valenciennes])<br />
Taxonomic notes. The type locality is usually listed as "Syria".<br />
But Valenciennes explicitly mentioned that "Mr Aucher<br />
Eloy (1792–1838) has sent, from Syria, a loach" and not that<br />
the loach was from Syria. Aucher Eloy was a botanist who<br />
travelled throughout most <strong>of</strong> Southwest Asia and sold natural<br />
history specimens. The material was apparently received<br />
in Paris in 1840 (after his death) and his last travels have<br />
been especially in Iran and as far east as Balochistan. He does<br />
not seem to have travelled much in Syria (Aucher Eloy, 1843).<br />
Nalbant & Bianco (1999: 114) listed and figured a specimen<br />
in MNHN (no catalogue number listed) as holotype <strong>of</strong><br />
Cobitis malapterura. It is nowhere stated in the original description<br />
that Valenciennes based his description on a single<br />
specimen (his use <strong>of</strong> singular is because he constantly referred<br />
to the species, not to individuals). Thus there is no<br />
reason not to consider the two specimens MNHN 3962 and<br />
B-3070 as syntypes.<br />
Figure 12 in Nalbant & Bianco (1999: 114) shows both a<br />
photograph <strong>of</strong> the "holotype" and the drawing <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
specimen in Cuvier & Valenciennes (1846: pl. 523). They<br />
disagree in showing the eye more backwards and protruding<br />
over the dorsal head pr<strong>of</strong>ile in the drawing (vs. not in the<br />
photograph), the dorsal-fin origin clearly closer to the base<br />
<strong>of</strong> the caudal fin than to the tip <strong>of</strong> the snout (vs. about halfway),<br />
differences in the shape <strong>of</strong> the adipose crest, and the<br />
shape <strong>of</strong> the belly in the drawing is a free reconstruction.<br />
10.26.6 Paracobitis rhadinaea (Regan, 1906)<br />
Nemachilus rhadinaeus Regan, 1906a: 8 (type locality: Afghanistan:<br />
affluents <strong>of</strong> Helmand River; syntypes: BMNH<br />
Kottelat: <strong>Conspectus</strong> <strong>cobitidum</strong><br />
100<br />
10.27.1 Paranemachilus genilepis, ASIZB 60382, 79.0 mm SL,<br />
holotype; China: Guangxi: Changping. (Photograph by Zhao Ya-<br />
Hui; caudal peduncle retouched by author).<br />
1905.11.29.28–29 [2], ZSI F 1240/1 [1], Menon &<br />
Yazdani, 1968: 120; adjective, -us, -a, -um)<br />
Nemachilus macmahoni Chaudhuri, 1910b: 341 (type locality:<br />
Afghanistan: affluents <strong>of</strong> Helmand River; holotype:<br />
ZSI F 1222/1, Menon & Yazdani, 1968: 120; noun in<br />
genitive, indeclinable)<br />
Taxonomic notes. Both N. rhadineus and N. macmahoni<br />
have been collected by the Seistan Arbitration Commission<br />
and have no other locality information besides "affluents <strong>of</strong><br />
the Helmand". All headwaters <strong>of</strong> Helmand River seem to be<br />
in Afghanistan, although the BMNH register indicates the<br />
locality <strong>of</strong> BMNH 1905.11.29.28–29 as Iran.<br />
10.26.7 Paracobitis smithi (Greenwood, 1976)<br />
Noemacheilus smithi Greenwood, 1976: 130, fig. 1 (type<br />
locality: Iran: Zagros Mountains: Kaaje-Ru [33°05'N<br />
48°36'E] near Baq-e-Loveh Oasis; holotype: BMNH<br />
1976.6.28.1; noun in genitive, indeclinable)<br />
Taxonomic notes. I tentatively follow Nalbant & Bianco<br />
(1999: 115) who placed this species in Paracobitis, but without<br />
discussion.<br />
10.26.8 Paracobitis vignai Nalbant & Bianco, 1999<br />
Paracobitis vignai Nalbant & Bianco, 1999: 115, figs. 14<br />
(type locality: Iran: Seistan: Nahr-Taheri, Zabol<br />
[31°01'48"N 61°29'42"E]; holotype: IZA 7838; noun in<br />
genitive, indeclinable)<br />
10.27 Paranemachilus Zhu, 1983<br />
Paranemachilus Zhu, 1983: 311 (type species: Paranemachilus<br />
genilepis Zhu, 1983: 311, by original designation).<br />
Gender masculine.<br />
Nomenclatural notes. Contrary to statement in Romero et<br />
al. (2009: 257), the original spelling Paranemachilus must<br />
be retained. The spelling Paranemachilus is used five times<br />
in the paper and this cannot be called a lapsus or an inadvertent<br />
error in the sense <strong>of</strong> Code art. 32.5.1. Also, neither<br />
Nemacheilus nor Nemachilus is used in the paper and comment<br />
that the spelling Paranemacheilus was intended is not<br />
supported; it is also irrelevant in regard to the Code.<br />
10.27.1 Paranemachilus genilepis Zhu, 1983<br />
Paranemachilus genilepis Zhu, 1983: 311, figs. 1–4 (type<br />
locality: China: Guangxi: Fusui County: subterranean<br />
stream in Changping [22°42'N 107°53'E; Romero et al.,<br />
2009: 257]; holotype: ASIZB 60382 [ex 790002]; compound<br />
noun, indeclinable)