04.04.2013 Views

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.3 Copy Number Aberrations Results<br />

Figure 6.7: The image summarises the results <strong>of</strong> the CGH arrays performed on<br />

cell lines G144, G166 and G179. Dots indicate log2 ratios for array CGH probes<br />

along the genome, comparing each GNS line to normal female DNA. The coloured<br />

segments indicate gain (red) and loss (green) calls, with colour intensity proportional<br />

to mean log2 ratio over the segment. The X chromosome was called as lost in G144<br />

and G179 because these two cell lines are from male patients; sex-linked genes were<br />

excluded from downstream analyses <strong>of</strong> aberration calls. The red segments above the<br />

grey line at zero indicate gains and red segments below it indicate losses over the<br />

entire genome.<br />

On a global level, we found a correlation between aberrations and expression<br />

levels, but this trend was modest (Fig 6.8a). Among the 459 autosomal genes<br />

that we found to be up-regulated in GNS relative to NS lines by Tag-seq,<br />

there was a clear enrichment <strong>of</strong> gains (p = 0.002 with Fisher’s exact test) and<br />

depletion <strong>of</strong> losses (p = 0.002) compared to all autosomal genes expressed in<br />

the GNS or NS lines. Down-regulated genes showed an opposite, but weaker,<br />

trend (Table 6.3, Fig 6.8b). We also observed that many <strong>of</strong> the 29 genes that<br />

were found to distinguish GNS lines from NS lines by qRT-PCR had associ-<br />

ated aberration calls that suggested their expression levels may be dictated<br />

by a loss or a gain in their copy numbers (Fig 6.8c). Overall, these results<br />

Table 6.3: Significance <strong>of</strong> the correlation found between CNAs and expression levels<br />

measured with Fisher’s exact test (p-value).<br />

Gains Losses<br />

Up-regulated 0.002163 0.002286<br />

Down-regulated 0.06997 0.4257<br />

suggest that copy number changes are a significant cause <strong>of</strong> the observed gene<br />

expression changes. However, other factors may be more important, because<br />

only a minority <strong>of</strong> up-regulated genes (21%) showed evidence <strong>of</strong> gains. Thus,<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!