04.04.2013 Views

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.4 Survival Analysis Results<br />

Table 7.6: Significance <strong>of</strong> survival association for GNS signature and IDH1 status.<br />

dataset Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> cases<br />

Single covariate Two covariates (GBM cases)<br />

GNS signature IDH1 status GNS signature IDH1 status<br />

TCGA 270 5.3x10-5 0.0015 0.0091 0.1489<br />

Gravendeel,<br />

GBM cases<br />

118 2.7x10-5 0.0031 9.2x10-4 0.0840<br />

Gravendeel<br />

et al, grade<br />

I-III cases<br />

86 6.5x10-4 0.5776 6.3x-4 0.5408<br />

Wald test p-values, indicating association with survival, for each covariate in a Cox<br />

proportional hazards model with one or two covariates (GNS signature, IDH1 status<br />

or both). Cases with unknown IDH1 mutation status were excluded.<br />

signature scores than IDH1 wild-type gliomas <strong>of</strong> the same histological grade<br />

(Fig 7.6b). However, we also found that the GNS signature bore a stronger<br />

survival association than the IDH1 status (Table 7.6). In fact, the signature<br />

remained a significant predictor <strong>of</strong> patient survival when controlling for IDH1<br />

status (Table 7.6), demonstrating that it contributes independent information<br />

to the survival model and does not simply represent a transcriptional state <strong>of</strong><br />

IDH1 wild-type tumours. This was evident in glioblastomas as well as grade<br />

I-III gliomas; the effect is thus not limited to grade IV tumours.<br />

Finally, to investigate whether the correlation between GNS signature and<br />

age could be explained by the higher proportion <strong>of</strong> cases with IDH1 mutation<br />

among younger patients, we repeated the correlation analysis described above<br />

(Fig 7.6a), limiting the data to glioblastoma cases without IDH1 mutation. For<br />

the TCGA dataset, the correlation was decreased somewhat (Pearson R = 0.25<br />

compared to R = 0.36 for the full dataset) but still highly significant (p =<br />

6x10 5 ), demonstrating that the correlation with age is only partially explained<br />

by IDH1 status. This result was confirmed in the Gravendeel dataset, where<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> controlling for IDH1 status and grade was negligible (R = 0.38<br />

compared to R = 0.39 for the full dataset including grade I-III samples).<br />

Among the individual signature genes, both HOXD10 and TUSC3 remained<br />

correlated with age in both datasets when limiting the analysis to IDH1 wild-<br />

type glioblastoma cases.<br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!