04.04.2013 Views

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.5 Large-scale qRT-PCR Validation Results<br />

for expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> individual genes was 0.91 and the differential expres-<br />

sion calls were corroborated for all 82 genes. Figure 6.12 shows the relationship<br />

between the qRT-PCR and the Tag-seq measurements in three different panels<br />

for four different genes that were picked to highlight the dynamic range <strong>of</strong> the<br />

qRT-PCR and the Tag-seq platforms: the matrix metallopeptidase is a mem-<br />

brane protein involved in the breakdown <strong>of</strong> the ECM and a known oncogene in<br />

glioblastoma primary tumours [183]; the damage-inducible transcript DDIT3<br />

is induced in response to a range <strong>of</strong> compounds that sensitises glioma cells<br />

to apoptosis [216]; MYL9 encodes for one <strong>of</strong> the myosin light chains and its<br />

link with glioblastoma has yet to be established (possibly acting via regulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cell migration process); the mannosidase gene MAN1C1 is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enzymes that hydrolyse the mannose sugar but has to yet be implicated in<br />

glioblastoma - although its sister gene MAN2C1 has been associated with a<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> PTEN functionality in prostate cancer [190]. In panel a <strong>of</strong> figure<br />

6.12 the high overall correlation between the two platforms is highlighted by<br />

the four data points that lie nearly on a straight line (R = 0.91); panel b shows<br />

the correlation values computed as the correlation between normalised Ct val-<br />

ues and tag counts across the five GNS cell lines (table <strong>of</strong> correlation values<br />

available in Appendix A.4); panel c shows the mean fold-change between the<br />

genes expressed in the GNS and NS cell lines as measured in each <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

platforms plotted so that the influence <strong>of</strong> outliers can be reduced thanks to<br />

the averaging.<br />

Across the entire panel <strong>of</strong> cell lines, 29 <strong>of</strong> the 82 genes showed statistically<br />

significant differences between GNS and NS lines at an FDR <strong>of</strong> 5% (Fig 6.13).<br />

This set <strong>of</strong> 29 genes distinguishes GNS from NS lines and may, therefore, have<br />

broad relevance for elucidating tumourigenic properties <strong>of</strong> GNS cells. Figure<br />

6.14 shows a histogram for each <strong>of</strong> the 29 genes found to be relevant in distin-<br />

guishing GNS from NS cell lines. The height <strong>of</strong> the histogram bar represents<br />

the expression level measured via qRT-PCR for that gene and its designated<br />

probe (see title <strong>of</strong> each histogram for probe’s name). Each expression level is<br />

calculated as the arithmetic mean across all biological replicates for each cell<br />

line. The histogram bar colours comply to the ones selected for GNS and NS<br />

cell lines in the bar displayed at the top <strong>of</strong> fig 6.14, distinguishing the assayed<br />

GNS and NS cell lines in two separate groups along the x-axis.<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!