04.04.2013 Views

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.3. Concluding Remarks Discussion<br />

in context with other genomic information in order to elucidate regulatory<br />

function. In an attempt to elucidate the answer to the research question <strong>of</strong><br />

interest, the hypothesis put forward by Alexiou et al [16] that combinations <strong>of</strong><br />

algorithms predict more accurately than the single algorithm alone was chal-<br />

lenged. Through the analysis described in this thesis it is clear that the target<br />

prediction algorithm ElMMo [155]is at the head <strong>of</strong> the list sorted by accuracy<br />

score out <strong>of</strong> the 258 combinations tested for. Although this analysis shows<br />

that ElMMo in particular has the most accurate target prediction algorithm<br />

within the pool <strong>of</strong> eight tested prediction algorithms, it must be noted that<br />

there is a substantial discrepancy between the score achieved by ElMMo and<br />

the next best score for a single target prediction algorithm. Before Diana-<br />

microT [237,316], the second highest solo score, many combinations <strong>of</strong> two to<br />

three target prediction algorithms appear earlier in the list, demonstrating the<br />

potential for better accuracy than another solo prediction algorithm. Although<br />

it is refreshing to see that one target prediction algorithm can fare better than<br />

the rest, the question remains as to whether the variables and factors that are<br />

taken into consideration, and the ones that are not, are fairly judged in the<br />

algorithm so as to simulate the intricate regulations happening within the cell.<br />

In fact, during this analysis the accuracy score <strong>of</strong> each prediction algorithm<br />

decreased greatly when a background gene list was not used to filter out all<br />

the genes that were predicted but were not tissue specific.<br />

While the results <strong>of</strong> this analysis indicate that some algorithms alone and some<br />

group <strong>of</strong> algorithms are better than others, it highlights at the same time the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> re-assessing the factors that are taken into consideration to<br />

make the microRNA target predictions. If we have reached the limit <strong>of</strong> what<br />

sequence-based algorithms can achieve, we ought to start thinking <strong>of</strong> adding<br />

another dimension to the field <strong>of</strong> microRNA target prediction algorithms that<br />

takes factors in components <strong>of</strong> the tissue-specific regulatory actions <strong>of</strong> microR-<br />

NAs.<br />

9.3 Concluding Remarks<br />

In this thesis I aimed to characterise the transcriptional landscape <strong>of</strong> <strong>Glioma</strong><br />

<strong>Neural</strong> <strong>Stem</strong> <strong>Cells</strong> (GNS) in the most comprehensive way possible. Several<br />

approaches were taken to examine the expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling data that gave in-<br />

sights into the stem cell component <strong>of</strong> the biology <strong>of</strong> these cells, which had<br />

232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!