04.04.2013 Views

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 <strong>Neural</strong> <strong>Stem</strong> <strong>Cells</strong> Introduction<br />

tors FGF2 and EGF as described by several previous studies [107,165,403,481].<br />

In their study, Sun et al [479] have shown that NS cells and their progenitors<br />

grew on adherent substrate significantly faster in the first four passages than<br />

the NS cells in neurospheres, but slowing down and plateauing their growth<br />

rate after the sixth or seventh passage, while in neurospheres their growth kept<br />

increasing slowly but steadily for more than 10 passages.<br />

Immunocytochemical analysis using multiple lineage-specific antibodies in early<br />

primary cultures for both neurosphere and adherent methods showed about<br />

60% MAP2 + neurons and about 40% Nestin + progenitors, indicating that<br />

both cultures were initially composed <strong>of</strong> neural progenitor and mature neu-<br />

ronal populations. However, proliferating neural progenitors became dominat-<br />

ing in adherent culture over the next few days to finish <strong>of</strong>f on the ninth day<br />

with a Nestin + progenitor percentage <strong>of</strong> 93.76%, clearly identifying the type<br />

<strong>of</strong> cells that eventually compose the culture [479]. In order to test for the<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> both culture systems to differentiate into neuronal and glial cells,<br />

growth factor withdrawal was induced for seven days and differentiation was<br />

assessed through the use <strong>of</strong> antibodies against Tuj1, GFAP and Olig-4 for the<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, respectively. The<br />

data gathered from passages 1, 3 and 5 revealed no significant differences in<br />

the differentiation potential <strong>of</strong> cells cultured with either method [479].<br />

Self-renewal capacity was assessed in the two culture systems through a clono-<br />

genic assay that evaluated the capacity <strong>of</strong> primary neurospheres to form sec-<br />

ondary neurospheres, as well as the capacity <strong>of</strong> plating from a single cell from<br />

the original adherent culture. The clone forming rates at passage 1 were found<br />

to be 63% for neurospheres and 44% for adherent culture, a number signifi-<br />

cantly higher for neurospheres than the 20% reported by Reynolds et al [525].<br />

Interestingly, as discussed in the study by Marten et al [319], in the fetal<br />

mouse forebrain geminal zone there seem to be two differently responding self-<br />

renewing cells that grow neurospheres with greater diameters in the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> EGF alone in their culture in vitro than FGF. Since in the culture systems<br />

developed by Sun et al both EGF and FGF were added, the two differently<br />

responsive stem cells might have been produced together, increasing the clone<br />

forming rates observed [479].<br />

Finally, neurosphere cultures were found to have a greater passage potential<br />

than adherent cultures, possibly due to the three-dimensional reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />

the niche environment experienced by the cells in vivo. In fact, the regulatory<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!