04.04.2013 Views

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

Transcriptional Characterization of Glioma Neural Stem Cells Diva ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.1 Enrichment Analysis Results<br />

specific pathway distribute across the ranked list, whether they are randomly<br />

distributed throughout the ranked list or primarily found at the top or bottom.<br />

Three key elements define the GSEA method [474]:<br />

1. Calculating an enrichment score that measures the degree to which a set<br />

<strong>of</strong> genes belonging to a pathway is overrepresented at the top or bottom<br />

<strong>of</strong> the entire ranked list <strong>of</strong> differentially expressed genes, for example<br />

(and corresponds to a weighted Kolmogorov-Smirnov like statistic).<br />

2. Estimating the significance <strong>of</strong> the enrichment score by permuting the<br />

phenotype labels and recomputing the enrichment score <strong>of</strong> the genes in<br />

the pathway each time. This generates a null distribution that the p-<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the observed original enrichment score is calculated against.<br />

3. Adjusting the enrichment score to account for multiple hypothesis testing<br />

when entire databases <strong>of</strong> pathways are evaluated at once, like in our case<br />

with the KEGG and Gene Ontology (GO) databases. In this case the<br />

enrichment score is first normalised to account for the size <strong>of</strong> the path-<br />

way, and then the proportion <strong>of</strong> false positives, or FDR, is calculated<br />

for each normalised enrichment score. The FDR associated to each nor-<br />

malised enrichment score corresponds to the estimated probability that<br />

a pathway with a given normalised enrichment score represents a false<br />

positive finding.<br />

The enrichment analysis using GO [106] and the KEGG pathway database [2]<br />

confirmed the set <strong>of</strong> 739 differentially expressed genes to be enriched for path-<br />

ways related to brain development, glioma and cancer (Table 7.2 and 7.1). We<br />

also observed enrichment <strong>of</strong> regulatory and inflammatory genes, such as signal<br />

transduction components, cytokines, growth factors and DNA-binding factors.<br />

Several genes related to antigen presentation on MHC class I and II molecules<br />

were up-regulated in GNS cells, consistent with the documented expression <strong>of</strong><br />

their corresponding proteins in glioma tumours and cell lines [120,174]. In line<br />

with these findings, affected pathways from the KEGG database included Anti-<br />

gen Processing and Presentation, Diabetes Mellitus Type I, Cytokine-cytokine<br />

receptor interaction, Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, MAPK signaling<br />

and, expectedly, <strong>Glioma</strong>, a collection <strong>of</strong> genes involved in glioma formation<br />

(Table 7.2). The first two plots from the GSEA run that identified these path-<br />

ways as being significantly altered in our dataset, are shown in figure 7.1. In<br />

the top panels <strong>of</strong> the figure the green distribution represents the trend <strong>of</strong> the<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!