27.04.2013 Views

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Natural and man-made features were <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

controlling items. These included <strong>the</strong> two<br />

lakes, Link River, main ridge lines, <strong>the</strong> railroad<br />

and <strong>the</strong> "A" canal. Any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se items would be<br />

costly to cross. For this reason <strong>the</strong> local<br />

distribution system for a district should fall<br />

within <strong>the</strong>se boundaries and only major supply<br />

lines would cross <strong>the</strong>ra at carefully selected<br />

points. City political boundaries did control<br />

<strong>the</strong> district locations to a degree, mainly to<br />

simplify future administration.<br />

<strong>Figure</strong> 2 is a generalized <strong>map</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> urban<br />

area showing <strong>the</strong> approximate district boundaries.<br />

The district areas increase with distance from<br />

<strong>the</strong> central business district, due to <strong>the</strong> reduction<br />

in heating (population) density in <strong>the</strong><br />

suburban areas. Heating loads for each district<br />

have not been determined, however it is estimated<br />

that <strong>the</strong> majority are approximately equal.<br />

FIGURE 2<br />

Heating District Boundaries<br />

Based on discussions with City planning<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials, a priority was given each district<br />

as to its probable inclusion into <strong>the</strong> system.<br />

Thus districts labeled "1" on <strong>Figure</strong> 2 would be<br />

developed first. "2" second, and so forth. Districts<br />

with priorities "1" and "2" have <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

boundaries fairly precisely determined for planning<br />

purposes, whereas priorities "5" and "6" have<br />

more flexible boundary locations due to <strong>the</strong> possible<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> future growth before <strong>the</strong>se districts<br />

come on-line.<br />

303<br />

Lund, et. al.<br />

A probable development schedule for each <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> priorities would be as follows:<br />

District Priority Tirae <strong>of</strong> Development<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

0-2 years<br />

2-5<br />

5-10<br />

10-15<br />

>15<br />

>20<br />

It should be noted that two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Districts<br />

immediately adjacent to <strong>the</strong> Commercial District<br />

were given a low "4" priority for development.<br />

This recognizes <strong>the</strong> fact that a great portion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se districts are already heated by individual<br />

wells, thus some <strong>of</strong> its heating needs are already<br />

being met by geo<strong>the</strong>rmal. Future development may<br />

be based on ei<strong>the</strong>r expanding <strong>the</strong> service load <strong>of</strong><br />

each existing well (from one to four houses, for<br />

example), or by providing a heating district<br />

similar to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r districts.<br />

Production Field Locations<br />

Several areas near or in <strong>the</strong> urban area have<br />

potential as production well sites. Each area<br />

was evaluated as to certain desirable characteristics,<br />

which included:<br />

1. proximity to users so as to minimize supply<br />

pipeline lengths;<br />

2. elevation head to provide gravity feed;<br />

3. availability <strong>of</strong> public land for development;<br />

and<br />

4. information on geo<strong>the</strong>rmal fluids existing in<br />

or adjacent to <strong>the</strong> site.<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> above criteria and geologic information,<br />

seven areas have potential to supply <strong>the</strong><br />

necessary fluids for <strong>the</strong> near term or future<br />

development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area. In many cases, additional<br />

geological, geophysical exploration, and/or<br />

drilling need to be performed to verify <strong>the</strong><br />

existence and characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resource.<br />

<strong>Figure</strong> 3 is a <strong>map</strong> to <strong>the</strong> same scale as <strong>the</strong><br />

geologic <strong>map</strong> indicating <strong>the</strong> seven sites. The<br />

numbers also indicate <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />

investigation and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sites. Site<br />

1 is discussed in detail.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!