27.04.2013 Views

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This method <strong>of</strong> calculation assumes <strong>the</strong> following:<br />

1. Depth is a vertical distance from ground surface.<br />

2. Correction for mean annual temperature is independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> discharge rate.<br />

3. Water is not mixing between aquifers.<br />

4. Temperature equilibrium is maintained in well.<br />

5. Mean annual temperature influences water temperature<br />

at surface and influences critical<br />

depth as defined above.<br />

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> standard mineral analyses were<br />

plotted on multiple tri-linear diagr'ams after<br />

Piper (1944). Ground waters were classified as<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r sodium chloride-calcium sulfate type, calcium<br />

sulfate type, or calcium-magnesium bicarbonate<br />

type. The bicarbonate waters were generally<br />

found in wells and springs near recharge areas,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> calcium sulfate waters were found with<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r increasing distance from recharge areas<br />

or in ground waters which were known to be mixing<br />

between aquifers. The sodium chloride-calcium<br />

sulfate type water was found only in Madison<br />

ground watiers in <strong>the</strong> Edgemont geo<strong>the</strong>nnal area.<br />

The standard mineral composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se ground<br />

waters was found to be significantly different<br />

from that <strong>of</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>r sampled ground waters.<br />

Of all <strong>the</strong> trace elements analyzed, only lithium<br />

and cobalt have higher concentrations in Edgemont<br />

area waters than in waters at all o<strong>the</strong>r sites.<br />

Strontium concentrations in Edgemont area waters<br />

ranged from 1,8 to 3,4 mg/l. Although cesium and<br />

rubidium were detected in Edgemont ground waters,<br />

it was not determined whe<strong>the</strong>r this is significant<br />

as <strong>the</strong>re is no data from o<strong>the</strong>r sampled sites.<br />

Aluminum, copper, lead, manganese, silver, and<br />

zinc were not detected in Edgemont waters, and<br />

additional analyses supplied by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Geological<br />

Survey indicated that only trace amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se elements, if any at all, occur in ground<br />

waters at o<strong>the</strong>r sites in <strong>the</strong> study area.<br />

GEOTHERMOMETRY<br />

Temperatures were calculated using <strong>the</strong> quartz and<br />

chalcedony geo<strong>the</strong>rmometers defined by Truesdell<br />

(1975) and <strong>the</strong> Na-K-Ca geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer defined by<br />

Fournier and Truesdell (1973). Water temperatures<br />

calculated using <strong>the</strong> quartz geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer ranged<br />

from 9.70c to 46.IOC above observed temperatures,<br />

whereas temperatures calculated using <strong>the</strong> chalcedony<br />

geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer ranged from 24.50C below to<br />

14.0OC above observed temperatures. Water temperature<br />

calculated using <strong>the</strong> Na-K-Ca geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer<br />

ranged from 41.30C below to 41.50C above observed<br />

temperatures.<br />

Table 3 lists <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> selected geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer<br />

calculations. The chalcedony geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer<br />

yielded <strong>the</strong> best correlation between observed temperatures<br />

and calculated temperatures. This is in<br />

agreerent with Fournier (1973) who found that<br />

chalcedony, ra<strong>the</strong>r than quartz, controls <strong>the</strong> dissolved<br />

silica content <strong>of</strong> waters below lOOOC.<br />

167<br />

Knirsch<br />

Most work with geo<strong>the</strong>rmometers has been done for<br />

high-temperature geo<strong>the</strong>rmal systems. The highest<br />

observed temperature in this study was 560C. No<br />

correlations exist between <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer<br />

calculations and temperature-depth gradients.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We wish to thank <strong>the</strong> U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy and<br />

<strong>the</strong> U.S. Geological Survey for <strong>the</strong>ir assistance<br />

with this study.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Fournier, R. 0., 1973, Silica in <strong>the</strong>rmal waters:<br />

Laboratory and Field Investigations, 2£ Proceedings<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> International Symposium on Hydrogeochemistry<br />

and Biogeochemistry, Japan, 1970, v.<br />

I, Hydrogeochemistry: Washington, DC, The Clark<br />

Co., p. 122-139.<br />

Fournier, R, 0., and Truesdell, A. H., 1973, An<br />

empirical Na-K-Ca geo<strong>the</strong>rmometer for natural<br />

waters: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, v. 37,<br />

n. 5, p. 1255-1276.<br />

Gries, J. P., 1977, Geo<strong>the</strong>nnal applications on <strong>the</strong><br />

Madison (Pahasapa) aquifer system in South Dakota:<br />

Final Report, Contract No. EY-76-S-07-1625,<br />

South Dakota School <strong>of</strong> Mines and Technology,<br />

100 pp.<br />

Iszler, J., Carda, D,, Skillman, D., Dunham, G.,<br />

and Reuter, W., 1979, Western South Dakota usage<br />

<strong>of</strong> geo<strong>the</strong>rmal energy from <strong>the</strong> Madison Formation<br />

--final report, ET-78-S-07-1707: Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Energy, Division <strong>of</strong> Geo<strong>the</strong>rmal Energy, Washington,<br />

D.C., 153 pp.<br />

Piper, A. M., 1944, A graphic procedure in <strong>the</strong><br />

geochemical interpretation <strong>of</strong> water analyses:<br />

Trans., Am. Geophys. Union, 25th annual meeting,<br />

p. 914-923.<br />

Schoon, R. A., and McGregor, D. J., 1974, Geo<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

potentials in South Dakota: S.O. Geol.<br />

Survey Rept. Inv. 110, 76 pp.<br />

Truesdell, A. H., 1975, Summary <strong>of</strong> Section III:<br />

Geochemical techniques in exploration Ui Proceedings,<br />

United Nations Symposium on <strong>the</strong> Development<br />

and Use <strong>of</strong> Geo<strong>the</strong>rmal Resources, 2nd,<br />

San Francisco: Washington, D.C, U.S. Govt.<br />

Printing Office, p. LIII-LXXIX.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!