27.04.2013 Views

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. near <strong>the</strong> County MuseLmi well (pr using <strong>the</strong><br />

actual, well); and<br />

3. near <strong>the</strong>-end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secondary supply Tine<br />

{near <strong>the</strong>' County Courthouse')'.<br />

Location 1 is best to minimize <strong>the</strong> effect on<br />

adjacent wells in terms <strong>of</strong> water levels,, but may<br />

cause premature temperature breakthrough. Location<br />

2 elimi nates a return pipeTine to <strong>the</strong> production<br />

zone and can use <strong>the</strong> existing museum well.<br />

Temperature .effect would also be less due to lower<br />

well water temperatures'in <strong>the</strong> injection area<br />

(around 180° to l:9d°F). Location 3 could be considered<br />

if .<strong>the</strong> primary heat, exchange facility were<br />

eliminated, thus elirainatirig <strong>the</strong> heed for <strong>the</strong><br />

cTosed-lobp sjecondary p.ipellne. Geo<strong>the</strong>rmal water<br />

would <strong>the</strong>ri be desliyered directly to all buildings,<br />

similar-to <strong>the</strong> Icelandic system. Each building<br />

would <strong>the</strong>n be required 'to supply <strong>the</strong>ir ortn heat exchanger<br />

or use <strong>the</strong> fluid directly. Injection near<br />

<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> line would eliminate <strong>the</strong> need for a<br />

return linei but may effect cold (60°' to 90°F) water<br />

wells in <strong>the</strong> area,.<br />

LBL reGonmends <strong>the</strong>^ second location, which is<br />

<strong>the</strong> main dfe considered in this report. The drilling<br />

and testing <strong>of</strong> at least two deep wells ih <strong>the</strong><br />

production area is necessary to better jevaluate<br />

this Tecommendatian.<br />

Dri'ltinq Costs - Klamath Basin. Well drilling<br />

costs in <strong>the</strong> Klaraath Basin by cable or r-otary rigs<br />

up to 3,000 feet are as follov/s:<br />

$1,00 per inch <strong>of</strong> diameter-per foot <strong>of</strong> depth<br />

in "s<strong>of</strong>t" rock, and<br />

$2.50 per inch <strong>of</strong> diamelier per foot <strong>of</strong> depth<br />

iri "hard" rock up to 500 feet in defith.<br />

For every additional 100-foot increment, add<br />

41.00 per-foot <strong>of</strong> clepth-<br />

Casing costs can be estimated at $1 ...05 per<br />

inch <strong>of</strong> diameter per foot Of depth. Full^<br />

depth casing is assuraed for all wells.<br />

Using <strong>the</strong>se costs, which include mobilization<br />

arid dempbilization, and assuraing that <strong>the</strong> production<br />

wells encounter <strong>the</strong> tsa'nie amounts <strong>of</strong> "hard" and<br />

"s<strong>of</strong>t" drilling that <strong>the</strong> test well log indicatesi<br />

drilTihg and casing <strong>of</strong> a 1,OdO-ft well would cost<br />

.$38,,'898 with full-depth casing. These costs are<br />

expected to: rise apprpximately 10% in <strong>the</strong> very nearfuture,<br />

and do not include costs for drilling mud,<br />

additional air- compressprs if requiredi -foaraing<br />

ageri'ts, etc.<br />

Central Heat Exchangers<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are three basic'methods <strong>of</strong> transferring<br />

<strong>the</strong> heat fro.m <strong>the</strong> gep<strong>the</strong>rmal water to <strong>the</strong> buildirig<br />

•air space. These are: 1} Use-, <strong>the</strong> geo<strong>the</strong>rmal water<br />

directly iri <strong>the</strong> building heat emitters.; 2} Utilize<br />

individual building hea't exchangers to transfer<br />

heat-frora <strong>the</strong> geo<strong>the</strong>rmal water to a building cTo'sedwater<br />

loop which in turn transfers heat to <strong>the</strong> heat<br />

emitters; arid 3) Utilize large central heat exchanger's<br />

to transfer heat to a di;strict. closed-war<br />

ter loop and supply <strong>the</strong> buildings with fresh-heated<br />

387<br />

Lund, et. al.<br />

water to be used in <strong>the</strong> heat emitters. Each system<br />

has its advantages and disadvantages.<br />

Even though <strong>the</strong> geo<strong>the</strong>rmal water in Klamath<br />

Falls IS relativeiy pure, <strong>the</strong> dire.ct use in heat<br />

emitters Is nol; recommended, especially in <strong>the</strong> fan<br />

coil units <strong>of</strong> air handling systeras and small tube<br />

baseboard units-. Experience with direct use at<br />

OIT, Shadow Hills Apartments, Kingswood .Manor<br />

apartmehts, arid several businesses in <strong>the</strong> East Main<br />

Street .area indicate that life expectancy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

fan coils may range from 1 1/2 Or 2 years to 12 or<br />

15 years. At both Shadow Hills and Kingswood Manor,<br />

leaks in fan coil units developed in 2.years or<br />

less. Inspection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> units shows corrosion occurring<br />

in <strong>the</strong> units priraariiy at soldered joints<br />

and: changes in direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tubes at "<strong>the</strong> ends,,<br />

although a few leaks have occurred in <strong>the</strong> main<br />

body <strong>of</strong> units v/here tubes are straight. AtOJT,<br />

five failures have occurred ir <strong>the</strong> 14 years <strong>the</strong><br />

Ltriits have been in service., again with most near<br />

soldered joints, headers^ and at <strong>the</strong> ends df cOils,<br />

There are no known di.rect uses <strong>of</strong> sraalT-finned tube<br />

baseboaird units, bui: since <strong>the</strong> materials and methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> construction are similar, it is assumed<br />

<strong>the</strong>y would have Simflar life tiraes. The exact nature<br />

and cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> failures, arid as, importantly<br />

<strong>the</strong> difference in life <strong>of</strong> some units, is not. known<br />

but is undeif study by OIT, Battel Te N-W. and<br />

Radian Corporation iri a joint effort. Until <strong>the</strong><br />

cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> failures .can be determined and/br .corrected,<br />

direct use is not considered practical.<br />

The-usual material's <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> fan<br />

coils are copper "tubes with pressed aluminum fins.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r jriatenals which may have' To'nger life are<br />

avai'lable, but reduce <strong>the</strong> heat transfer efficiency<br />

and are more costly. As far as is kriown, all units<br />

presently installed in any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air handling<br />

units in <strong>the</strong> buildings to be heated in <strong>the</strong> district<br />

do have copper tubes.<br />

Direct Use. The advantages Of direct use are<br />

that water would.be supplied to <strong>the</strong> buildings at<br />

higher temperatuice since heat would not be' lost in<br />

a heat exchanger and <strong>the</strong> distriet construction<br />

cost y/ould be much less'. The main disacfvantage' is<br />

that iperhaps few customers v^oul'd hook up since <strong>the</strong><br />

reduced, cost <strong>of</strong> heat energy would be <strong>of</strong>fset, or<br />

p'er haps exceeded by, increased costs <strong>of</strong> maintenance.<br />

Since experience is liraited, <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong><br />

failures is unknown, arid useful lives <strong>of</strong> components<br />

apparently varies considerably even, within individual<br />

systeras; maintenanGe and, replacement costs<br />

ate next to impossible to evaluate., and an economic<br />

comparison be'tween this- system and o<strong>the</strong>r's is<br />

impossible,.<br />

Indi vi dual Bui Tdinq Exchangers. The second<br />

riethod, that <strong>of</strong> .supplying geo<strong>the</strong>rmal water to each<br />

building where heat isr transferred -to a closed loop<br />

within <strong>the</strong> .building, is a viable^ alternative and<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers several advantages but in th'e.overa-TT-, is<br />

more mostly due to <strong>the</strong> economics <strong>of</strong> size.<br />

Each :building would have its small heat exchanger,,<br />

probably a plate type, with <strong>the</strong> associated<br />

valves and controls to control <strong>the</strong> pressure flow.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!