Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$GU)\^^y-^' - University of Utah$

$e?Lx:>cP\^l - University of Utah$

1 -.— ABSTRACT Average temperature-depth gradients in wells penetrating the Mississippian Madison Limestone in Edgemont, South Dakota, are 4.7°C/I00 m, whereas the average gradient in the Black Hills area is 2.6OC/100 m. Chemical analyses of ground water from forty-one Madison wells and springs were obtained to define the geochemical characteristics of the low-temperature (
Knirsch Table 1. Continued Location Well Name Zn Al S2- HCO3 F Cl SO. Si02 pH 9S-2E-laa3 Edgemont-Burlington — — — 181 0.8 139 300 34 7.0 All data reported in mg/l n.d. = not detected R.R. Lowest detectable limits: Li = 0.02 Sr = 0.02 Ni = 0.05 Rb = 0.13 Co = 0.02 Fe = •- 0.01 9S -2E-lacdbl Edgemont-City #1 n.d. n.d. 3.2 157 0.9 244 424 45 6.9 Aq Pb Water temperatures ranged from 51.0 to 55.60C during the pumping tests. However, temperatures at each site did not increase significantly and the chemical composition of the ground waters did not vary significantly. Therefore, we concluded that increasing the discharge rate of the wells would not significantly alter either water temperature or water chemistry. = 0.0008 = 0.01 Cu Zn 9S-2E-lbcdl Edgemont-City #2 n.d. n.d. 0.04 161 1.1 249 465 45 6.8 = 0.007 Al = = 0.015 S2- = 5.0 0.005 9S-2E-2daal Edgemont-City #4 n.d. n.d. 0.03 177 1.1 284 466 43 6.8 GROUND WATERS SAMPLED WITHIN A 50-MILE RADIUS Of the forty-one wells and springs sampled in the Black Hills area, eighteen are within a 50-mile radius of Edgemont. The locations of four selected sample sites and the results of chemical analyses are listed in Table 2. Water temperatures ranged from IO.6OC to 53.30C, and temperature-depth gradients ranged from I.7OC/IOO m to 4.0OC/100 m. Table 2. Chemical data from ground water for selected Madison wells and springs within a 50-mile radius of Edgemont, South Dakota Location Well/Spring Name Depth (m) Temp (OC) TDS Li Na K Mg Ca Sr Co Ni HCO3 F Cl SO4 Si02 pH All data reported in mg/l 8S-5E-20cda Cascade Springs 21.5 2636 0.08 38 10 95 549 6.9 n.d. n.d. 183 1.0 52 1490 21 ' 6.9 TEMPERATURE-DEPTH GRADIENTS A true geothermal gradient for the Black Hills was not calculated, due to the lack of available heat flow data. Temperature-depth gradients reported in this summary are defined in the following manner: Temperature of water recorded on-site=t^^pQ Mean annual temperature at or near site of well= tMA Corrected temperature=tH20-tMA=tc Total depth of wen=d 7S-5E-13bdd Evans Plunge 32.0 1122 0.14 84 14 44 200 3.2 n.d. n.d. 183 0.9 110 430 21 6.8 166 10S-2E-3daal Black Hills Ordnance Depot §1 1219 53.3 1024 0.25 182 18 22 121 1.8 0.07 n.d. 156 0.6 308 310 34 7.3 45N-60W-20dcal Newcastle #1 804 26.1 266 n.d. 2.1 1.9 29 62 0.02 n.d. n.d. 281 0.1 2.5 57 14 7.6 Critical depth (depth to which temperature measurement is affected by mean annual temperature or near surface thermal disturbances)=18 meters (Schoon and McGregor, 1974)=dQR Corrected depth=d-dcR=dc Then, the temperature-depth gradient for a single measurement at one well=tc/dc=G-['o. For most wells, more than one temperature measurement was recorded. In some localities, more than one well exists. For these cases, the temperature-depth gradient was averaged for all measurements at all wells.
Page 1 and 2: Geol^ertnal Resources Council, TRAN
Page 3 and 4: silica concentration in a water sam
Page 5 and 6: Morgan, et at. holes over the anoma
Page 7 and 8: Morgan, et al. point the gradient b
Page 9 and 10: Olson, et al of a theoretically gen
Page 11 and 12: Olson, et al Isherwood, W. F., 1977
Page 13 and 14: Sun and Ershaghi history matching p
Page 15 and 16: Sun and Ershaghi eg S o "^ lii z >o
Page 17 and 18: « •'t Lund. et. al. In general,
Page 19 and 20: Lund. et. al. FIGURE 3 Production F
Page 21 and 22: W.:-- Lund, et. al. Since the heat
Page 23 and 24: Lund, et. al, and temperature in th
Page 25 and 26: Lund. et. al. of the well with cont
Page 27 and 28: Lund, et, al. special heat resistan
Page 29 and 30: Lund, et. al. Ste«) in {«) Tunne\
Page 31 and 32: Lund, et al. 3. 4. References TABLE
Page 33 and 34: •Edmis-tjon period of time buried
Page 35 and 36: Edmiston VININI FM (SILICEOUS ASSEM
Page 37 and 38: Table I. Chemical analyses and calc
Page 39 and 40: Satkln et al. GEOTHERMOMETRY The te
Page 41 and 42: Denlinger We modeled the gravity da
Page 43: TABLE 3. RESULTS OF MODELING RESERV
Page 47 and 48: Knirsch Spring/Well Edgemont Burlin
Page 50: Mariner et al. MomfflatI Min H>0^ 1
Page 54 and 55: Mariner et al. KjRiti/Locit Ion T:i
Page 57 and 58: Mariner et al. T.ibU' I. CftL'iBlr;
Page 60 and 61: Mariner et al. Table 2. CoioposltLo
Page 63 and 64: Mariner et. al. Table 3. Geotherrao
Page 66 and 67: Mariner et al. Table 3. Geotherraom
Page 69 and 70: Mariner et al. Table 5. Expected an
Page 72 and 73: Mariner et al. Table 6. Isotopic da
Page 75 and 76: Mariner et al. Table 6. Isotopic da
Page 78 and 79: Mariner et al. 9 K O Figure 10. 10
Page 80 and 81: Mariner, et al. hot springs and sha
Page 82 and 83: Mariner et al. Mariner, R. H., Pres
Page 84 and 85: BOREHOLE GEOPHYSICAL TECHHIQUES FOR
Page 86 and 87: Thick-Body Studies ^ Prior to 1982,
Page 88 and 89: J-. - (l.ti.od. Co' FIGURE 4c Downh
Page 90 and 91: ' X • , methods; and, the anomali
Page 92 and 93: Geolhermal Resources Council TRANSA
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 2. Index map of MCAGCC, Twen
Page 96 and 97:
SMPERATURE GRADIENTS Temperature gr
Page 98 and 99:
EOTHEFttVlAL RESERVOIR— FLUID TEM
Page 100 and 101:
Geolhermal Resources Council TRANSA
Page 102 and 103:
Geology ((aJMG) within the Napa Val
Page 104 and 105:
^C Bomw of (tw VaAmf Figure 4. Tril
Page 106 and 107:
Geolhermal Resources Council. TRANS
Page 108 and 109:
Geophysical studies by Youngs and o
Page 110 and 111:
feothermal aquifer into a zone of i
Page 112 and 113:
INTRODUCTION Geothermal Resources C
Page 114 and 115:
do not become isothermal or have ne
Page 116:
the heat flow anomaly predicted fro
Page 120 and 121:
INTRODUCTION In our experience, all
Page 122 and 123:
The bo'rehDle" eiectricai, techniqu
Page 124 and 125:
T1ie Cascades Region For the past t
Page 126 and 127:
which is the rociprpGal pE resistiy
Page 128 and 129:
of the .deefjer thermal regime .in
Page 130 and 131:
Wright et al. vide basic data about
Page 132 and 133:
training and experience in each of
Page 134 and 135:
Thermai genesis of dissGlution cave
Page 136 and 137:
JEWEL CAVE THERMAL GENESIS OF DISSO
Page 138 and 139:
the Soviet Union), however, where K
Page 140 and 141:
SiKiype THERMAL GENESIS OF DISSOLUT
Page 142 and 143:
sed onto a longer term lowering are
Page 144 and 145:
Ceothermal Resources Council RADON
Page 146 and 147:
^H—^ ^ * I SAN IGNACtO O o V ' o
Page 148 and 149:
GUTIERREZ-NEGRIN This geothermal zo
Page 150 and 151:
GOSNOLD TEMPEiRAVURc (Doq. C) FIGUR
Page 152 and 153:
GOSfJCLD bas(?raent. radioactivity
Page 154 and 155:
GOSNOLD Sass, J.H., and Galanis, S.
Page 156 and 157:
Corbaley and Oquita 50 sos+cr 4. -f
Page 158 and 159:
Ctorbaley and Oquita "The combined
Page 160 and 161:
JANIK ct al. Old Fort Road valley,
Page 162 and 163:
JANIK et al. with a cold water at a
Page 164 and 165:
JANIK et al. — Pilncipal hot-w«l
Page 166 and 167:
DIRECT HEAT APPLICATION PROGRAM SUm
Page 168 and 169:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Special Session A
Page 170 and 171:
Special Session/Agenda (continued)
Page 172 and 173:
DIRECT HEAT APPLICATION PROJECTS Th
Page 174 and 175:
Institutional Heating Systems 1 Nav
Page 176 and 177:
00 t Agribusiness 1 Utah Roses —
Page 178 and 179:
DIRECT HEAT APPLICATIONS PROJECT DE
Page 180 and 181:
Commercial Prawn Farm Project Page
Page 182 and 183:
Boise City Project Page 2 Project D
Page 184 and 185:
Project Title: City of El Centro Ge
Page 186 and 187:
City of El Centro Project Page 3 St
Page 188 and 189:
Elko Heat Company Project Page 2 Sy
Page 190 and 191:
Philip School Project . Page 2 Proj
Page 192 and 193:
Project Title: Geothermal Energy fo
Page 194 and 195:
INJ EAST - WEST DIAGRAMMATIC CROSS
Page 196 and 197:
.TO CC> ;i'iLjS^" •
Page 198 and 199:
o EXISTING FACTORY A UNION aoiiER I
Page 200 and 201:
Kelley Hot Springs Agricultural Cen
Page 202 and 203:
Project Title: Klamath Falls YMCA 1
Page 204 and 205:
Project Title: Klamath Falls Geothe
Page 206 and 207:
Klamath Falls Project Page 3 Status
Page 208 and 209:
Madison County Project Page 2 Statu
Page 210 and 211:
Monroe City Project Page 2 Status:
Page 212 and 213:
Navarro College and Memorial Hospit
Page 214 and 215:
Ore-Ida Foods Project Page 2 A seis
Page 216 and 217:
Pagosa Springs Geothermal Project P
Page 218 and 219:
Moana KGRA Project Page 2 Fracture
Page 220 and 221:
Project Title: Geothermal Applicati
Page 222 and 223:
'4 ]^ W^^ '!-/..-'
Page 224 and 225:
Project Title: Susanville Energy Pr
Page 226 and 227:
Susanville Energy Project Page 3 Th
Page 228 and 229:
] ^ ITffl^SSH '(gSPW-
Page 230 and 231:
THS Memorial Hospital Project Page
Page 232 and 233:
Utah Roses Project Page 2 Project D
Page 234 and 235:
Utah State Prison Project Page 2 On
Page 236 and 237:
Warm Springs State Hospital Project
Page 238 and 239:
Appendix 1 (continued) Industrial P
Page 240 and 241:
Appendix I (continued) Industrial P
Page 242 and 243:
Appendix 1 (continued) industrial P
Page 244 and 245:
^ Appendix 1 (continued) Industrial
Page 246 and 247:
1. PROJECT SUMMARY - JUNE 1987 1.1
Page 248 and 249:
1. k. 1. m. Name Date Nature Gib Co
Page 250 and 251:
Name Date Nature m. Kevin Fisher 6/
Page 252 and 253:
3. GEOTHERMAL PROGRESS MOMITOR 3.1
Page 254 and 255:
g. If a new or amended Geothermal D
show all

Figure I Generalized map of the Wilbur Mining ... - University of Utah

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?