05.05.2013 Views

extended abstracts - Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology

extended abstracts - Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology

extended abstracts - Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Geomorphic</strong> processes <strong>and</strong> geoarchaeology<br />

stages of the Upper Palaeolithic (with the exception of Spitsynian, which contains<br />

imported raw-material).<br />

3.2. Fuel. The quantity of large hearths, up to 1 m in diameter <strong>and</strong> up to 50 cm in<br />

thickness, filled with bone charcoal at the Gravettian sites provides direct evidence for<br />

heavy use of bone fuel. Most probably, bone was the primary fuel under the cold<br />

conditions of MIS2, because wood charcoal is extremely rare at the sites of this period.<br />

By contrast, wood charcoal is more common in the cultural layers of earlier periods,<br />

although this may be related to taphonomic conditions of the more humic sediments of<br />

these periods.<br />

In general, fuel resources did not have a significant role in site location decisions.<br />

The highly adaptive abilities of Palaeolithic populations, even under periglacial<br />

conditions, ensured use of all available organic materials for fuel.<br />

3.3. Plant resources. Although the Palaeolithic economy is traditionally<br />

characterized as «hunting <strong>and</strong> gathering», the problem of gathering remains largely<br />

unaddressed because of the lack of material evidence for plant use. Rogachev's<br />

hypothesis of «complex gathering», based on the recovery of «pestle – grinders» as tools<br />

for preparation of plant foods for long-term storage, recently received support from the<br />

identification of traces of starch on the surface of these artifacts. Nevertheless, the role of<br />

plant foods in the diet of Palaeolithic peoples is based primarily on actualistic logic <strong>and</strong><br />

ethnographic analogy. Most likely, vegetal foods did not play a major role in the diet <strong>and</strong><br />

did not significantly affect site location choices.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

1. The lack of correspondence between specific cultures of the Upper Palaeolithic<br />

<strong>and</strong> the regional concentrations of sites suggests the absence of a connection between the<br />

spatial distribution of archaeological cultures <strong>and</strong> the environment.<br />

2. The longitudinal distribution of Palaeolithic cultures along large river basins,<br />

cutting across latitudinal climate zones, also supports the argument that such a connection<br />

is absent.<br />

3. Site locational criteria for settlements by Palaeolithic populations were uniform<br />

for all periods <strong>and</strong> cultural traditions.<br />

4. The two patterns: а) within deeply incised valleys, <strong>and</strong> b) on high elevations,<br />

reflect different site location criteria <strong>and</strong> local conditions <strong>and</strong> do not correspond to<br />

specific cultural traditions.<br />

5. On the basis of our current state of knowledge, no specific consideration<br />

(geomorphic setting, fuel, raw materials, etc.) seems to have been the only factor in the<br />

choice of site location.<br />

Grant RFBR: 11-06-12007- ofi-m.<br />

HUMAN ADAPTATION TO THE PERIGLACIAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE<br />

LATE PALAEOLITHIC<br />

Sinitsyna G.V.<br />

Institute of the History of Material Culture, RAS, St. Petersbur,<br />

Russia, gv-sinitsyna@y<strong>and</strong>ex.ru<br />

The earliest sites of the Final Palaeolithic (12,800 – 10,100 BP, Bølling – younger<br />

Dryas) in Eastern Europe are located in different l<strong>and</strong>scape zones. They base on the<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!