extended abstracts - Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology
extended abstracts - Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology
extended abstracts - Geomorphic Processes and Geoarchaeology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Geomorphic</strong> processes <strong>and</strong> geoarchaeology<br />
stages of the Upper Palaeolithic (with the exception of Spitsynian, which contains<br />
imported raw-material).<br />
3.2. Fuel. The quantity of large hearths, up to 1 m in diameter <strong>and</strong> up to 50 cm in<br />
thickness, filled with bone charcoal at the Gravettian sites provides direct evidence for<br />
heavy use of bone fuel. Most probably, bone was the primary fuel under the cold<br />
conditions of MIS2, because wood charcoal is extremely rare at the sites of this period.<br />
By contrast, wood charcoal is more common in the cultural layers of earlier periods,<br />
although this may be related to taphonomic conditions of the more humic sediments of<br />
these periods.<br />
In general, fuel resources did not have a significant role in site location decisions.<br />
The highly adaptive abilities of Palaeolithic populations, even under periglacial<br />
conditions, ensured use of all available organic materials for fuel.<br />
3.3. Plant resources. Although the Palaeolithic economy is traditionally<br />
characterized as «hunting <strong>and</strong> gathering», the problem of gathering remains largely<br />
unaddressed because of the lack of material evidence for plant use. Rogachev's<br />
hypothesis of «complex gathering», based on the recovery of «pestle – grinders» as tools<br />
for preparation of plant foods for long-term storage, recently received support from the<br />
identification of traces of starch on the surface of these artifacts. Nevertheless, the role of<br />
plant foods in the diet of Palaeolithic peoples is based primarily on actualistic logic <strong>and</strong><br />
ethnographic analogy. Most likely, vegetal foods did not play a major role in the diet <strong>and</strong><br />
did not significantly affect site location choices.<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
1. The lack of correspondence between specific cultures of the Upper Palaeolithic<br />
<strong>and</strong> the regional concentrations of sites suggests the absence of a connection between the<br />
spatial distribution of archaeological cultures <strong>and</strong> the environment.<br />
2. The longitudinal distribution of Palaeolithic cultures along large river basins,<br />
cutting across latitudinal climate zones, also supports the argument that such a connection<br />
is absent.<br />
3. Site locational criteria for settlements by Palaeolithic populations were uniform<br />
for all periods <strong>and</strong> cultural traditions.<br />
4. The two patterns: а) within deeply incised valleys, <strong>and</strong> b) on high elevations,<br />
reflect different site location criteria <strong>and</strong> local conditions <strong>and</strong> do not correspond to<br />
specific cultural traditions.<br />
5. On the basis of our current state of knowledge, no specific consideration<br />
(geomorphic setting, fuel, raw materials, etc.) seems to have been the only factor in the<br />
choice of site location.<br />
Grant RFBR: 11-06-12007- ofi-m.<br />
HUMAN ADAPTATION TO THE PERIGLACIAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE<br />
LATE PALAEOLITHIC<br />
Sinitsyna G.V.<br />
Institute of the History of Material Culture, RAS, St. Petersbur,<br />
Russia, gv-sinitsyna@y<strong>and</strong>ex.ru<br />
The earliest sites of the Final Palaeolithic (12,800 – 10,100 BP, Bølling – younger<br />
Dryas) in Eastern Europe are located in different l<strong>and</strong>scape zones. They base on the<br />
260